You're confusing the two concepts. Clearly one can be a nice person and be a great surgeon. But nice doesn't equal thoughtful or action oriented.
In the situation I described the particular resident was very nice, very bright and very thoughtful and introspective. However he was also unable to make decisions in situations where they needed to be made rapidly, was unable to take charge and command the room. These are required in surgery.
WS, you mentioned that a 'thoughful, sensitive, nice' person didn't 'make it'. Were they not tough enough or maybe they didn't like the culture?
The resident did not leave of his own accord. He attending medical school there and knew the "culture" well. The fact was that he was not decisive, confident and authoritative enough to make it as a senior resident. As Samoa notes, you can be nice but that doesn't mean that others will respect you and follow your command. The trouble is that sometimes others ASSUME that the nice resident is one to walk all over.
I cannot begin to tell you the "favors" allied staff think they will get from the nice residents. It is however, absolutely amazing to me as an attending to find that pretty much whatever I want I get. But off topic...
Thoughtful medical residents have to run codes just as surgical residents do in the trauma bay. Both require quick decisions.
Algorithmic code situations are not the same as trauma (which can also be cookbook but often has multiple issues going on as opposed to the typical medicine code). There isn't much thinking involved in running a code (except when to stop), IMHO.
I'm not intending to be argumentative, but your comment seems to propogate this idea that nice folks who are sensitive and thoughtful just can't cut it in surgery.
The comment wasn't meant to reflect my thoughts on the subject. Nor did I ever say that sensitive and thoughtful people can't cut it in surgery. All you have to do is read my comments earlier in the thread or elsewhere here to see that I don't think that way.
But it would be a farce to argue that surgeons aren't more action oriented than the more "thoughtful" or introspective internist.
I think it's this myth that forces these people away from surgery, concentrating folks who think they're tougher than other specialists and further alienating those who are kind, sensitive and thoughtful because there's so few like them in the field. I may revise my position next year after a year of surgery, but it seems from medical school and most other aspects of life that culture is a more powerful force than evidence.
Again, I'm not sure where you are getting the idea that I said the inquiries into your undergraduate degree had anything to do with fears that philosophy majors are kind and sensitive.
Would you not agree that philosophy majors:
- enjoy reading
- enjoy lengthy discussions
- are reflective?
You find these sorts of students in every field, but with those beliefs how you can blame a surgical faculty for wondering if you would be action oriented enough. The point is that when one hears that you were a philosophy major they tend to assume you embody some of the stereotypes: namely that you like to think and discuss things at length. There is of course room for that in surgical residency (and no, residency doesn't beat it out of you). But the concern is that a philosophy major may be MORE of a thinker or take too long to act.
I provided the example to show that you can be nice, bright, have good skills and ABSITE scores but if you hesitate or fail to act it may mean the end of your career.This is not about being nice but dividing the world into thinkers and doers.
So my point is not that:
nice guys can't be surgeons
thoughtful people can't be surgeons
philosophy majors can't be surgeons
I don't think I'm suggesting that everyone will react this way but I have heard this criticism aimed at students and residents more than once. Surgical residency is more than the trauma bay but your actions there and else where can color how others evaluate you.