- Joined
- Oct 31, 2006
- Messages
- 7,506
- Reaction score
- 2,714
I frequently state, with enthusiasm, that the sole value of an SMP is its ability to get people into med school.
I also frequently state that skepticism is good when looking at SMPs which do not make public such results, or which do not make it clear how many grads get in MD vs. DO or how soon.
3 years ago, the last time I worked up an SMP list, I used the count of med school courses, with med students, on a med school campus, as the primary basis of SMP reputation. That's less clear now.
I'm bringing this up because the Mississippi College program, about which I have made some ungenerous WTF-style comments, because it's not hosted at a med school, appears to be rocking the public results. It's using NBME shelf exams on coursework to set a basis of comparison with other programs hosted at med schools. I assumed it was expensive because it's a private school, but it's cheaper than all but Tulane ACP.
To the extent that anybody cares what I think (and I don't assume anybody does), Mississippi College's program looks entirely legit as an SMP choice. Results are highly localized to the delta area at this point, but I could see that changing.
Compare this results page: http://www.mc.edu/academics/departments/biology/graduates/past-graduates/2010/
With Cincinnati's: http://www.med.uc.edu/physiology/MS-2010.htm
Note: as always, if you are looking at SMPs, be a smart consumer. Find alumni. On SDN, read every post in every thread about the programs you're considering. When you have multiple anecdotes that show students with your stats getting results you want from an SMP, then you know you're on the right track.
Best of luck to you.
I also frequently state that skepticism is good when looking at SMPs which do not make public such results, or which do not make it clear how many grads get in MD vs. DO or how soon.
3 years ago, the last time I worked up an SMP list, I used the count of med school courses, with med students, on a med school campus, as the primary basis of SMP reputation. That's less clear now.
I'm bringing this up because the Mississippi College program, about which I have made some ungenerous WTF-style comments, because it's not hosted at a med school, appears to be rocking the public results. It's using NBME shelf exams on coursework to set a basis of comparison with other programs hosted at med schools. I assumed it was expensive because it's a private school, but it's cheaper than all but Tulane ACP.
To the extent that anybody cares what I think (and I don't assume anybody does), Mississippi College's program looks entirely legit as an SMP choice. Results are highly localized to the delta area at this point, but I could see that changing.
Compare this results page: http://www.mc.edu/academics/departments/biology/graduates/past-graduates/2010/
With Cincinnati's: http://www.med.uc.edu/physiology/MS-2010.htm
Note: as always, if you are looking at SMPs, be a smart consumer. Find alumni. On SDN, read every post in every thread about the programs you're considering. When you have multiple anecdotes that show students with your stats getting results you want from an SMP, then you know you're on the right track.
Best of luck to you.