Target to begin introducing CVS-branded pharmacies in its stores

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

PAtoPharm

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
1,508
Reaction score
201
Source: Boston Business Journal -- http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2016/02/03/target-ceo-talks-cvs-deal-plans-for-boston.html

"Target’s next stores in Greater Boston are going to look a lot like the one the retail giant opened in Fenway last year, CEO Brian Cornell said Wednesday, and they will soon feature CVS pharmacies rather than Target-branded ones.

Cornell, speaking to local business leaders as the featured speaker for Boston College’s CEO Club, called the Fenway Target, until recently branded a CityTarget, a “crown jewel” of the company’s properties. The store, on Bolyston Street, is three levels and 160,000 square feet, a much more contained space than its properties in more suburban locales.

Target (NYSE: TGT) is focusing more on cultivating urban customers, so most of its new stores going forward will be of the compact variety, according to Cornell. “Unfortunately, there aren’t a lot of 10-acre parcels in metro areas where we can put up those,” he said.

The retail giant is opening new stores in Cambridge and at Packard’s Corner, near Boston University, in the coming months, he said. But its real estate teams are actively looking for other sites in Boston. “Some of those may be 15,000 or 20,000 square feet, some might be 40 or 50, depending on the neighborhood and the real estate we have to work with,” Cornell said.

The retailer’s digital sales are growing, anyway, Cornell said. Going forward, customers will be more likely to order products online ahead of time, then swing by Target’s physical locations to pick them up, lessening the need for stores to have a large number of products in the aisles at any given time.

Cornell hit on a few other topics during the luncheon:

The CVS rebranding: Beginning this week in North Carolina, Target pharmacies are being rebranded as CVS pharmacies, with a full, nationwide rebranding taking place over the next 6 to 8 months. Cornell said he isn’t concerned that long-time Target pharmacy customers will be put out by the change.

“We spent a lot of researching that. Our guest has complete confidence in CVS. They’re going to bring expanded capabilities in areas we don’t have today,” he said, adding that the combination makes for a “terrific partnership."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So, what do you guys think? Does this mean that working for Target as a pharmacist will be just as miserable as working as a pharmacist in a standalone CVS?
 
So, what do you guys think? Does this mean that working for Target as a pharmacist will be just as miserable as working as a pharmacist in a standalone CVS?

For the former Target Rph, it will suck, no doubt. No lunch break, new metrics, PCQ calls, cutting tech hours, etc. But I think it will still be better for them than their counterparts in the average CVS retail environment. At least Target doesn't have a drive thru. Also, unlike CVS, customers drop off their script and happily go about their shopping. customers at CVS don't want to shop while they wait because it's:

A) too expensive, and
B) very limited selection
 
Everyone knows what is coming next. Endless metrics and you will be treated like crap. I really feel bad for the target pharmacist who really had it good. You were the envy of the profession. Now you are in the toilet.
 
I wonder who'll be in charge of OTC/healthcare/dental product sales, Target or CVS?
 
I wonder who'll be in charge of OTC/healthcare/dental product sales, Target or CVS?

Target. Cvs gets the box of their pharmacy, that's it.


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile app
 
Everyone knows what is coming next. Endless metrics and you will be treated like crap. I really feel bad for the target pharmacist who really had it good. You were the envy of the profession. Now you are in the toilet.
Envy of the profession? Ha, not even close.
 
Another profession?

Or maybe the VA.

It's all subjective. I know people who LOVE CVS like, well, a drug. On the flip side, I'm doing a rotation at a VA (ambulatory care), and holy God its dry and boring...
 
Everyone knows what is coming next. Endless metrics and you will be treated like crap. I really feel bad for the target pharmacist who really had it good. You were the envy of the profession. Now you are in the toilet.

Well looks like I will have to add Target to the group of pharmacy chains i will never work for including CVS. No lunch break is not acceptable along with constant bitching about metrics is not worth the pay bump.
 
Ignoring the CVS part, it seems odd that Target is starting to do exactly what Walmart just gave up on. The small square footage stores are the ones that all were getting axed in that recent announcement.
 
I have a question as a former Target/now CVS rph. What is the overtime policy/compensation with CVS? I am salaried at 84 hours/pay and have heard there is just a slight increase above your hourly rate or something along those line?
 
I have a question as a former Target/now CVS rph. What is the overtime policy/compensation with CVS? I am salaried at 84 hours/pay and have heard there is just a slight increase above your hourly rate or something along those line?

Base salary plus either 5 or 6 dollars per hour worked over base. Can't recall exactly.
 
Extra pay is supposed to kick in once you work (hours over base) + 4 for a given week. You can validate the following examples to see if this is true (based on my actual pay stubs) based on 40 base hours per week.

Example with 110 hours in a pay period:

Total hours worked: 110
Hours over base: 30
Extra pay hours: 24

Week 1 hours over base: 28 (68-40 = 28)
Week 1 extra pay hours: 24 (28-4 = 24)

Week 2 hours over base: 2 (42-40 = 2)
Week 2 extra pay hours: 0


Another example with 100 hours where I went over base both weeks (so the difference between hours over base and extra pay hours is 8):

Base hours: 80
Total hours worked: 100
Hours over base: 20
Extra pay hours: 12

Another example with 123 hours going over base both weeks:

Base hours: 80
Total hours worked: 123
Hours over base: 43
Extra pay hours: 35

As for choice of chain retail Kroger and Walmart are probably the least worst in general for companies with a nationwide presence. Unless you work at a busy Walmart, then it might be hell (still 12 hour days but pumping out 4,000 a week, no thanks).
 
Extra pay is supposed to kick in once you work (hours over base) + 4 for a given week. You can validate the following examples to see if this is true (based on my actual pay stubs) based on 40 base hours per week.

Example with 110 hours in a pay period:

Total hours worked: 110
Hours over base: 30
Extra pay hours: 24

Week 1 hours over base: 28 (68-40 = 28)
Week 1 extra pay hours: 24 (28-4 = 24)

Week 2 hours over base: 2 (42-40 = 2)
Week 2 extra pay hours: 0


Another example with 100 hours where I went over base both weeks (so the difference between hours over base and extra pay hours is 8):

Base hours: 80
Total hours worked: 100
Hours over base: 20
Extra pay hours: 12

Another example with 123 hours going over base both weeks:

Base hours: 80
Total hours worked: 123
Hours over base: 43
Extra pay hours: 35

As for choice of chain retail Kroger and Walmart are probably the least worst in general for companies with a nationwide presence. Unless you work at a busy Walmart, then it might be hell (still 12 hour days but pumping out 4,000 a week, no thanks).

I have never heard this. When I pick up shifts I get the whole time, not time less four hours.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using SDN mobile app
 
I was still paid for all hours worked, but I didn't get the +$6 extra premium except for any hours above 44 (40 + 4 over base).

You would think this extra pay condition is the same everywhere unless this is an AZ-only thing
 
Or maybe the VA.
I have friends who love VA. I've only worked in two, and they were both awful. Both pharmacy departments created work for the sake of work, leading to an inanely busy (but still somehow unproductive) work day, with meetings randomly peppered throughout. I had an IV tech lead us through a technique demo on our first day there, and it took her all of 10 minutes to prepare one piggy back. She did so few IVs that the whole thing was an acrobatic work of art, like she was putting on a show.

I used to just close Link (or whatever the IM program is called) as soon as it popped up, otherwise everybody would ping you all day.

We had one pharmacist demand to be called "DOCTOR so-and-so," while none of us wore coats or even a tie.

I don't miss VA.
 
We had one pharmacist demand to be called "DOCTOR so-and-so," while none of us wore coats or even a tie.

I don't miss VA.

This offer is person is usually the worst pharmacist on staff, but the most into the unproductive busy work.
 
I have friends who love VA. I've only worked in two, and they were both awful. Both pharmacy departments created work for the sake of work, leading to an inanely busy (but still somehow unproductive) work day, with meetings randomly peppered throughout. I had an IV tech lead us through a technique demo on our first day there, and it took her all of 10 minutes to prepare one piggy back. She did so few IVs that the whole thing was an acrobatic work of art, like she was putting on a show.

I used to just close Link (or whatever the IM program is called) as soon as it popped up, otherwise everybody would ping you all day.

We had one pharmacist demand to be called "DOCTOR so-and-so," while none of us wore coats or even a tie.

I don't miss VA.

Sounds exactly like any government job. No motive for a profit can lead to no motive for efficiency. People get bored but want to keep their paychecks so they create work that they create the need for or they themselves fight to prove the value for (which then can create even more pointless jobs).
There's certainly a large number of people here that say corporations/shareholders/business people are the purest of evil but no one can argue that their main objective is very simple and clear cut. Wasted resources (yes that means inefficient labor) goes directly against their primary mission.
 
Top