- Joined
- May 25, 2003
- Messages
- 49
- Reaction score
- 0
On interview feedback someone wrote:
What negatively impressed you?
Sometimes it seemed like they were trying too hard to defend Osteopathy. There seems to be a somewhat complacent, and at times almost defeatest attitude about their reputation as a second-rate school. In fact, they explicitly defended osteopathic medicine (I think rightly) as a discipline that is just as entitled to the respect that MD's have garnered within both medicine and society at large.
Can anyone further explain this about TCOM interviewers?
What negatively impressed you?
Sometimes it seemed like they were trying too hard to defend Osteopathy. There seems to be a somewhat complacent, and at times almost defeatest attitude about their reputation as a second-rate school. In fact, they explicitly defended osteopathic medicine (I think rightly) as a discipline that is just as entitled to the respect that MD's have garnered within both medicine and society at large.
Can anyone further explain this about TCOM interviewers?