i am thankful that Amanda had the chance to reply and clear up any misrepresentation and for her role in communicating the student perspective to the board. as she mentioned, the AOA house of delegates has not voted on this yet (it will be voted on in july), so the issue is definitely not dead. i would encourage everyone to learn as much as they can about the issue and communicate to your student government leadership and SOMA leadership - who will continue to address it.
however, without AOA policy on the issue, and without the HOD having a chance to vote on the issue to create policy, i do think it is inappropriate for anyone (including AOA leadership) to say that "the AOA is against this". the exception to this is if the BOT has the authority to make policy in between HOD meetings, and this would have had to mean that the BOT has taken an official vote against the combined match, which i'm not sure has or has not happened (?). if there is official policy (HOD or BOT) out there - please let me know, and post to this listserv.
now the COPT (council on postdoctral training), the group assigned to study the original resolution presented last july, has taken an official vote *against* the resolution and against the combined match, but i don't believe that they have the authority to set policy for the organization (their report will come back in july and be considered by the HOD in their vote).
hopefully i understand everything correctly here (please post if not).
also - re: the letter sent by Dr. Thomas to the AMA, i have explained this before on a previous post:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=166249&page=6&pp=20
<see page 6>
bl