- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
- Messages
- 25
- Reaction score
- 58
What I am about to say will likely get a negative response; but it is expected when the uncomfortable truth is laid bare. We currently have a continued oversupply of pathologists, evidenced by market trends, political decisions regarding reimbursement, adoption of new workarounds (push for nursing to handle moderate complexity, automation, ai, hospital consiladation, telepathology, etc). This may be obvious to some but when the leadership constantly puts out statements and cries of understaffing and other woes, one can be forgiven for losing sight of what's in front of you.
Some basic questions to think about:
Where is the actual hard data about staffing ratios, salary trajectories, hiring practices, and average caseload?
Why is pathologyoutlines of all things being used as a basis of claims?
Is it a shortage of staff or a lack of drive to adopt to new technology to offset unneeded labor (ie recent darkreport discussing ai and automation in the lab)?
Where is the genuine outcry from the pathology community? Shouldnt there be more consistent discussion and movement to change?
To the congressmen and/or other political figures reading the gist is you'd be doing a favor cutting funding for pathology. I promise that if you continue cutting spending the pathology field will not only be able to handle it, but do it with a sheepish smile.
To med students, you are already smart enough to stay away so I have nothing to add.
Some basic questions to think about:
Where is the actual hard data about staffing ratios, salary trajectories, hiring practices, and average caseload?
Why is pathologyoutlines of all things being used as a basis of claims?
Is it a shortage of staff or a lack of drive to adopt to new technology to offset unneeded labor (ie recent darkreport discussing ai and automation in the lab)?
Where is the genuine outcry from the pathology community? Shouldnt there be more consistent discussion and movement to change?
To the congressmen and/or other political figures reading the gist is you'd be doing a favor cutting funding for pathology. I promise that if you continue cutting spending the pathology field will not only be able to handle it, but do it with a sheepish smile.
To med students, you are already smart enough to stay away so I have nothing to add.
Last edited: