- Joined
- May 12, 2009
- Messages
- 123
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi all,
Seems to me that Columbia has been getting bashed on a bit recently for two main reasons, its cost, and its supposed lack of clinical training. Not going to go into the cost as thats a personal judgement, but I want to share some thoughts about the clinical aspect.
I talked to my dentist/mentor about his opinion on Columbia's supposed weakness and wanted to share it.
He says that no matter where you go to school your going to really learn your clinical skills and get them up to speed in the one or two years immediately following school, likely in a residency or a specialty program. He therefore says that for as far as picking schools we should be more concerned about the quality of the medical education than the amount of clinical practice mandated. There are obviously tons of good schools with great programs out there, but I am a little tired of seeing Columbia written off so fast by so many as the typical example of a clinically weak school (Though thats debatable since its really up to the student to get their clinical skills in shape and since I have heard Columbia has a new curriculum which gets students into clinic earlier).
Anyway just something to think about. Take it or leave it. Not really trying to get into a detailed argument about Columbia's strengths and weaknesses just wanted to share some advice I was given.
Good luck choosing everyone
Seems to me that Columbia has been getting bashed on a bit recently for two main reasons, its cost, and its supposed lack of clinical training. Not going to go into the cost as thats a personal judgement, but I want to share some thoughts about the clinical aspect.
I talked to my dentist/mentor about his opinion on Columbia's supposed weakness and wanted to share it.
He says that no matter where you go to school your going to really learn your clinical skills and get them up to speed in the one or two years immediately following school, likely in a residency or a specialty program. He therefore says that for as far as picking schools we should be more concerned about the quality of the medical education than the amount of clinical practice mandated. There are obviously tons of good schools with great programs out there, but I am a little tired of seeing Columbia written off so fast by so many as the typical example of a clinically weak school (Though thats debatable since its really up to the student to get their clinical skills in shape and since I have heard Columbia has a new curriculum which gets students into clinic earlier).
Anyway just something to think about. Take it or leave it. Not really trying to get into a detailed argument about Columbia's strengths and weaknesses just wanted to share some advice I was given.
Good luck choosing everyone