i always think its funny when someone starts calling others immoral. ahhh the self rightous sentiments of teabaggers. what you find immoral, you would have made into law that your opinion immorality should be made illegal?
also who is anti change? that seems like a ridiculous position doesn't it.
Anti-change DOES seem like a ridiculous position; that is, unless you believe that an absolute set of morals legislated by a white-bearded man in the clouds exists. In that case, anti-change can ONLY be moral, and all that is moral is anti-change.
Good thing people with that mindset have never had political power throughout all of history since the Holy Roman Empire came into existence. Wouldn't that be unfortunate?
That being said, I would totally vote Republican if Philistines and YECs weren't the party bosses and if the Limbaugh/Hannity/Beck/Huckabee hive mind wasn't the mouthpiece of such an offal-spewing hate machine. It's too bad -- their fiscal policy (old school conservative, not this neo-con, Reaganomics, cut and spend, anti-accountability movement) is really quite attractive. Everything else is vomit-inducing.
Now to be relevant:
Minimize taxable income by minimizing visible, direct income. Invest your earnings in real estate, stocks, bonds, etc. to yield capital gains that are taxed at a lower rate than the highest income bracket which I'm sure you are in.
Also, keep wasteful spending low and investing high, especially at this early stage in life. You're getting maybe 65 cents on the dollar to spend as a result of tax, so a $65,000 price tag is more like $100,000. Instead of losing the asset-producing potential of that money by blowing it on a car or something, invest it. That way, you have the possibility of increasing the value of those 65 cents on the dollar rather than squandering it. If you rein in your spending, live frugally, and invest your meager, tax-perforated income, you could be extremely wealthy surprisingly quickly. No guarantees, but educate yourself on investing, and it will be worth a shot.