SDN members see fewer ads and full resolution images. Join our non-profit community!

The Exact Opposite...

Discussion in 'Pre-Medical - MD' started by SnudgeMuffin, Dec 19, 2001.

  1. SnudgeMuffin

    SnudgeMuffin Senior Member 7+ Year Member

    Oct 19, 2001
    New Jersey
    I think we talked about sucessful stories of people with less than mediocre stats getting into medical schools ALOT. Likewise, we heard something like, "Oh, I heard that this guy with 3.7+ GPA and 34+ MCAT didn't get into anywhere." Why do you think that is??? <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
  2. SDN Members don't see this ad. About the ads.
  3. Coalboy

    Coalboy Senior Member 7+ Year Member

    Oct 14, 2001
    East Providence, RI
    Because he/she was a complete social incomp?
    The interviews are there to weed these people out.
  4. AmateurChef

    AmateurChef Health policy consultant 7+ Year Member

    Dec 14, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Interviews, usually. I know of a 3.8/43 who didn't take his interviews very seriously -- or so I heard -- and didn't get in anywhere during his first year applying. The second year, though, was an entirely different story...
  5. Medical123

    Medical123 Senior Member 7+ Year Member

    Dec 4, 2001
    Sometimes, I don't know what these schools are thinking. I work with a woman whose son was "Man of the Year" at his university and was rejected by that university's medical school, despite his 4.0 GPA and "good" (I don't know the score) MCAT! He got in elsewhere and is extremely happy!Since the schools look at the "whole picture", I think a lot of it may have to do with extracurricular activities, previous health care experience,and letters of recommendation.
  6. Mystique

    Mystique The Procrastinator 7+ Year Member

    Jul 6, 2001
    I have two friends who had great stats and were waitlisted/rejected. I KNOW for a fact that they have great extracurriculars and are very people-oriented. So, it's not as if they were social rejects. Sometimes, it's just beyond my comprehension why they reject the most promising candidates.

    What I'm about to write is all in jest, so no one get mad at me...but, I think the adcoms blindfold themselves and throw darts at candidates names. It really makes a lot of sense to me. I know a bunch of insincere a**holes who've gotten in the past few years. I could go on and on....back to the nice/naughty list.
  7. postbacchus

    postbacchus Senior Member 7+ Year Member

    My philosophy has become this: every med school is looking for something different. There are so many variables, and no one I've met has every single one covered. These variables include:

    overall GPA
    science GPA
    undergrad institution
    AMCAS essay
    leadership experience
    research experience/publication
    letters of rec
    clinical experience

    There are a lot more things to consider than just stats. Especially with the top 20 type schools, they're splitting hairs. Maybe someone has only 1 published article and everything else is GREAT. Maybe that school had a 2+ article threshhold for interviews. They can afford to be picky, so they exclude that person.

    The moral of the story: IT'S A CRAP SHOOT. That's why many of us apply to 25+ schools.
  8. SMW

    SMW Grand Member 7+ Year Member

    Jul 12, 2001
    anchorage, ak
    I think that they just don't have enough spots for all the qualified applicants they get, same as the highly competitive undergrad programs. Inevitably some worthy candidates are going to be passed over. So I think rejections shouldn't be taken so personally. Imagine if you had 10 different suitors clamoring to marry you, all of them perfectly acceptable and with very different personalities, accomplishments and backgrounds. You'd have to choose somehow, and the 9 rejected would never understand your reasoning!! :D
  9. Mystique

    Mystique The Procrastinator 7+ Year Member

    Jul 6, 2001
  10. Ohiobuddhist

    Ohiobuddhist Member 7+ Year Member

    Oct 17, 2001
    Athens, Ohio
    Don't assume that just because it's medical school that there's a science to this whole admissions process. :p
  11. SMW

    SMW Grand Member 7+ Year Member

    Jul 12, 2001
    anchorage, ak
  12. Incendiary

    Incendiary Fantabulous Member 10+ Year Member

    Nov 12, 2001
    While it would seem true from a statistical point of view that the number of applicants decreasing would increase everyone else's odds, I think that in the end it won't make a difference. All the people who aren't applying probably weren't that gung-ho in the first place, so now the pool is probably filled with ONLY the gunners and cutthroat types... :eek:
  13. jase133

    jase133 Senior Member 7+ Year Member

    Oct 23, 2001
    North of the 49 deg
    I have a theory too. Maybe the interviewers just simply didn't like the way the applicant looked.

    "I don't like his/her face... Let's reject the sucker."

  14. EpiII

    EpiII Senior Member 7+ Year Member

    Oct 26, 2001
  15. idiot

    idiot Member 7+ Year Member

    Nov 8, 2001
    You said the application pool decreased by 6000? What was the total pool last year?

    Just curious; someone told me the pool decreased this year to the extent that 50% of all applicants will get accepted.

    Mil gracias.
  16. SMW

    SMW Grand Member 7+ Year Member

    Jul 12, 2001
    anchorage, ak

Share This Page