I graduated in 2010 and did an AEGD thinking that I'd just go back to CA (CA takes AEGD for a license). I then decided to specialize and am doing endo residency now. I decided to take the NERB in May. I spent $5300 for patients from Lu Lau dental services since I don't get to screen for patients like I used to when I was practicing. The class 2 I received was bad because the adjacent tooth had a pretty bad carious lesion. After I opened up the contact I saw a cavitation, noted it to the examiners and they still failed me because they said "I nicked the tooth." Well, I passed the other sections but have to take restorative over again. In any case, after spending nearly $9k, I have to spend another $4k or so to retake the exam, fly my patients to Florida and hope for the best. In retrospect, take the exam during school and don't use Lu Lau (screen for your own patients so that you can take care of the entire mouth before the exam).
Dental licensing exams are unethical in my opinion specifically because most people have to hold out on treatment to take the exam and one bad day can screw you over months of salary. I agree more with a portfolio type of licensing which is what CA is trying to do. Can we ban together and do something about this? I feel like the ADA isn't doing much to address this issue. These regional boards are just collecting money up the wazoo not to mention shady prep services like Lu Lau (which I shouldn't have trusted in the first place).