- Joined
- Apr 1, 2009
- Messages
- 188
- Reaction score
- 1
New article on Hearing Health Matters re: prevalence of real ear measures.
http://hearinghealthmatters.org/hearinprivatepractice/2011/the-reality-of-real-ear/
It states that only about 40% of audiologists within the US are using it! I know that in my program we use it with our patients at the on campus clinic, off site usage varies quite a bit. How often are you guys using it? Is it being taught as best practice for HA fittings? I know time is often argued but I have not found that it takes that much time and use of NAL/DSL prescriptions makes it relatively simple to at least get a solid starting point, then fine tuning based on both the patient input and real ear measures.
I'd also suggest reading Kochkin's piece on reducing number of patient visits through use of verification and validation measures.
http://www.betterhearing.org/pdfs/M8_Verification_Validation_Study.pdf
http://hearinghealthmatters.org/hearinprivatepractice/2011/the-reality-of-real-ear/
It states that only about 40% of audiologists within the US are using it! I know that in my program we use it with our patients at the on campus clinic, off site usage varies quite a bit. How often are you guys using it? Is it being taught as best practice for HA fittings? I know time is often argued but I have not found that it takes that much time and use of NAL/DSL prescriptions makes it relatively simple to at least get a solid starting point, then fine tuning based on both the patient input and real ear measures.
I'd also suggest reading Kochkin's piece on reducing number of patient visits through use of verification and validation measures.
http://www.betterhearing.org/pdfs/M8_Verification_Validation_Study.pdf
Last edited: