- Joined
- Jan 1, 2007
- Messages
- 4,826
- Reaction score
- 492
Doctor-patient confidentiality? Or should the people running background checks have access to all of our medical history?This guy was declared Mentally Ill by a Virginia Court in 2005. A Virginia special justice declared that he was "an imminent danger." to himself and others as a result of mental illness. That court document went on to say that Cho was in need of hospitalization and unable to care for self, and is uncapable of volunteering or unwilling to volunteer for treatment.
Source: http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/04/18/vtech.shooting/index.html
I don't really support strict gun control, but I have a sinking feeling that if Virginia like Texas required a 3-day waiting period where in-depth background checks are conducted that they would have found these court documents declaring that Cho was Mentally Ill and unfit to lawfully own firearms.
Instead Virginia only requires a "quick search" background check using some sort of state database and requires no waiting period.
I'm not saying that a waiting period is The solution, but if a person declared Mentally Ill by a state court is allowed to Legally Buy a Gun... something is definitely not right with the gun control laws.
P.S. I'm not trying to start an argument either. Just want to inform you that there was a problem with him owning a firearm. I too dont blame guns, but believe that Mentally Ill people shouldn't own them.
I will agree that people should be blacklisted if deemed a danger to themselves or others, but how are you going to get around HIPAA?
What about current gun owners? Should they be subjected to routine psych evaluations to make sure they haven't gone crazy? Do we take their guns away if someone goes to a shrink?