- Joined
- Feb 27, 2010
- Messages
- 66
- Reaction score
- 2
Let me state that I am an independent voter. I watched a Glen Beck episode featuring practicing physicians, and medical students. I was quite surprised to see that the majority of medical students appear to favor versions of the current healthcare legislation which is being considered in congress.
I think that all future physicians should be aware that under current reform plans your reimbursement by Medicare will be determined by a independent government panel. As a matter of reality, when the government reduces reimbursement, private payors also tend to follow suit.
I copied a post from a medical student from the Anesthesiology forum and repost it here because it does an excellent job of summarizing this plan.
Independent Medicare Advisory Board
"The Senate bill would establish an Independent Medicare Advisory Board, which would be required to recommend changes to the Medicare program to limit its spending growth. Its recommendations would go into effect automatically unless Congress votes to block them. Such changes would be required if the Medicare trustees projected that the programs spending per beneficiary would grow more rapidly than the medical inflation rate or the growth in per capita medical spending. The board couldn't change eligibility or benefits, so its recommendations would likely focus on Medicare Advantage plans and on payments to medical providers." (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31389142...h-health_care/)
We're going to be indentured servants for our careers!! Under Obamacare this government appointed panel of 5-physician experts are in charge of lowering medicare reimbursements. We've been straddled by medical school debt and are being forced into lower salaries, the next few decades are gonna be rough if you're not 65+.
White House version of this new panel - it's a Trojan Horse.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/07/17/IMACUBend/
Folks I feel fortunate to be on the tail end of my career. If you want the government to have such a large control over your life, then by all means support this bill. If you dont want a government panel reducing your income simply based on a need to cut costs, then call your congressman and tell them to vote no.
I think that all future physicians should be aware that under current reform plans your reimbursement by Medicare will be determined by a independent government panel. As a matter of reality, when the government reduces reimbursement, private payors also tend to follow suit.
I copied a post from a medical student from the Anesthesiology forum and repost it here because it does an excellent job of summarizing this plan.
Independent Medicare Advisory Board
"The Senate bill would establish an Independent Medicare Advisory Board, which would be required to recommend changes to the Medicare program to limit its spending growth. Its recommendations would go into effect automatically unless Congress votes to block them. Such changes would be required if the Medicare trustees projected that the programs spending per beneficiary would grow more rapidly than the medical inflation rate or the growth in per capita medical spending. The board couldn't change eligibility or benefits, so its recommendations would likely focus on Medicare Advantage plans and on payments to medical providers." (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31389142...h-health_care/)
We're going to be indentured servants for our careers!! Under Obamacare this government appointed panel of 5-physician experts are in charge of lowering medicare reimbursements. We've been straddled by medical school debt and are being forced into lower salaries, the next few decades are gonna be rough if you're not 65+.
White House version of this new panel - it's a Trojan Horse.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/07/17/IMACUBend/
Folks I feel fortunate to be on the tail end of my career. If you want the government to have such a large control over your life, then by all means support this bill. If you dont want a government panel reducing your income simply based on a need to cut costs, then call your congressman and tell them to vote no.