I have been in your shoes before. Last year, the most frustrating thing for me was to outwork everyone just to be above average and then get a reality check in Qbank by scoring 40-50%. There's no reason for this sort of things to happen if I was being properly taught. I am one of the biggest critics about PhDs not being able to properly teach medical students by not testing high yield stuff and instead focusing on stupid stuff. That's the only reason for above average students
@Giovanotto to get shredded on Qbank. Now that I'm in board prep mode since Day 1, that feeling is being reinforced first hand by seeing stuff being tested on in house exams not being emphasized in both Kaplan and USMLE-Rx qbanks, while Kaplan and USMLE-Rx Qbanks testing on ignored stuff. For example, in Endo, the distinctions between Neuroblastoma and Pheochromocytoma are heavily expressed and tested in qbanks. Yet, in my class lectures, I didn't see a single ppt slide about Homer Wright Rossete or vignette trying to point to Neuroblastoma. That's setting your students for failure. Currently, my in house exams are pointing to an average student. Yet, my Qbank results are saying something different. If you put in the work, have faith in yourself. Your first two years are defined by your Step 1 score, not some PhD outdated eval.