To Hold or not to hold - MBB/RFA?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
B

Blitz2006

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
1,599
Reaction score
393
Points
5,331
Members do not see this ad.
Just wondering what everyone's practice is on holding anti-coagulation for:

1. Cervical MBB/RFA

2. Lumbar MBB/RFA

Generally I tend to continue AC for Lumbar MBB/RFTC, Hold for Cervical MBB/RFTC...

Good? Bad? Suggestions? Discuss!
 

Members do not see ads. Register today.

Never hold for facets
 
I use 22g if anticoagulated as a punt. It’s annoying that asra is behind on this issue and increases our liability for making the correct medical decision.
 
pmrmd said:
I hold for ILESI and SCS only. Everything else I have them maintain their regimen.
Click to expand...
Tfesi? Going the lobel route i see. Using a 25g?

I still cant pull the trigger on that one
 
Haven’t held for a lumbar TF in forever. Usually 25g but sometimes 22g if 5 or 6 inches down. Heck I did a two level thoracic kypho today and kept the guy on his warfarin.
 
Are people holding for S1 TF?

I dont for all other lumbar TFE. Dont hold for mbb, facets, rfa.
 
DubVille said:
Are people holding for S1 TF?

I dont for all other lumbar TFE. Dont hold for mbb, facets, rfa.
Click to expand...
What's your concern with S1? I tend to get vascular more often there but should be small vessels unlike concern for lumbar TF with artery of adamkiewicz. I still hold for all TFESI, but I'd be more inclined to continue for lower levels vs higher.
 
pmrmd said:
Haven’t held for a lumbar TF in forever. Usually 25g but sometimes 22g if 5 or 6 inches down. Heck I did a two level thoracic kypho today and kept the guy on his warfarin.
Click to expand...
waat
 
DubVille said:
Are people holding for S1 TF?

I dont for all other lumbar TFE. Dont hold for mbb, facets, rfa.
Click to expand...
Exactly. S1 should be treated differently from other TFESI as an inch of the needle is placed into a completely enclosed and very vascular space. Easy to bleed and nowhere for the blood to go. If you hold for caudal you should hold for S1.

Very different at other TF levels as the needle is barely in the foremen and bleeding is much less likely to cause an issue.
 
bedrock said:
Exactly. S1 should be treated differently from other TFESI as an inch of the needle is placed into a completely enclosed and very vascular space. Easy to bleed and nowhere for the blood to go. If you hold for caudal you should hold for S1.

Very different at other TF levels as the needle is barely in the foremen and bleeding is much less likely to cause an issue.
Click to expand...

I understand what you’re saying, But I don’t completely agree that s1 and caudal should be in the same category. I stop for s1, not caudal. One of the main risk factors for having a SYMPTOMATIC hematoma is spinal stenosis. Lots of people have spinal stenosis at L4/L5, so injecting at s1 is not terribly far from there. However, sacral stenosis is a rare entity, and the needle should be going at most to s3 and usually lower for a caudal. That’s pretty far from where most people develop stenosis.

For what it is worth, there will be a publication coming out in the next 4 to 6 months in pain physician that I worked on in patients who receive caudal ESI on blood thinners. None had complications.
 
I do not hold for lumbar TFESI or caudal. If I want to do S1 and they're on AC I just do an L5-S1.
 
I typically follow the modified SIS 2013 guidelines from the Goodman et al paper.

Seems to be in agreement with most here but has you hold for IL, caudals, S1, cervical tf (I dont do them), and scs/kypho.

I would love to have recs not to hold for S1. I will sometimes perform infraneural L5 if they cant go off thinners but I dislike infraneural approach if I can avoid it.
 
Last edited:
On AC just do an L5-S1 TFESI. Why do S1 on thinners? Just do L5-S1.
 
Last edited:
Is there any data on efficacy between S1 and L5-S1? Medication spreads 1 level up 2 levels down, right? Haven't done S1 in a long time and haven't really felt the need to.
 
I don't hold for RF or MBB ever. I do still hold for TFE, but I guess there's not really a need
 
Baron Samedi said:
Is there any data on efficacy between S1 and L5-S1? Medication spreads 1 level up 2 levels down, right? Haven't done S1 in a long time and haven't really felt the need to.
Click to expand...
for a true S1 radic or a paracentral HNP at L5-S1 hitting the S1 nerve, you should try to put the medication as close to S1 as possible. that means a S1 TFESI or L5-S1 ILESI. there is no data saying which is better
 
painfree23 said:
wat can we say to lawyers if hematoma results?
Click to expand...
Hematoma outside the spinal canal from facet injection or mbb??
If you did an intrarticular joint injection steroids decrease bleeding risk, so hemarthrosis is extremely unlikely.
 
DubVille said:
Hematoma outside the spinal canal from facet injection or mbb??
If you did an intrarticular joint injection steroids decrease bleeding risk, so hemarthrosis is extremely unlikely.
Click to expand...
I get it. But Lawyers gonna understand “outside” va “inside” the canal? But DOCTOR , what about the ASRA guidelines?
 
pmrmd said:
Haven’t held for a lumbar TF in forever. Usually 25g but sometimes 22g if 5 or 6 inches down. Heck I did a two level thoracic kypho today and kept the guy on his warfarin.
Click to expand...
don't think many recommend that
 
BobBarker said:
Let’s talk about that Coumadin kypho... that is the most interesting thing in this thread.
Click to expand...
So the guy had fractures for weeks now. If he was going to bleed through that bone he would have already. Cement kills bugs and stops bleeders. Done several now with people that couldn't stop their Plavix or Coumadin or whatever. I'm more nervous about the S1 TFs on anti-coagulation than a kypho.
 
pmrmd said:
So the guy had fractures for weeks now. If he was going to bleed through that bone he would have already. Cement kills bugs and stops bleeders. Done several now with people that couldn't stop their Plavix or Coumadin or whatever. I'm more nervous about the S1 TFs on anti-coagulation than a kypho.
Click to expand...
Dang, I think you need to rewrite the asra guidelines!
 
I’ll be honest, this thread is entirely at odds with the standard practice in my area. Everyone follows ASRA guidelines, everyone will stop AC for TFESI, casual, or ILESI, all are accessing the epidural space.

kypho on AC! No way.
 
dipriMAN said:
I’ll be honest, this thread is entirely at odds with the standard practice in my area. Everyone follows ASRA guidelines, everyone will stop AC for TFESI, casual, or ILESI, all are accessing the epidural space.

kypho on AC! No way.
Click to expand...
Haven't checked in a while but doesnt ASRA also want you to stop aspirin?
 
SSdoc33 said:
Haven't checked in a while but doesnt ASRA also want you to stop aspirin?
Click to expand...
For high risk procedures yes.

I don’t think I could bring myself to go against the guidelines by my board recommends. It would be like an anesthesiologist scoffing at NPO guidelines, even though aspiration is an extremely rare event.
 
dipriMAN said:
For high risk procedures yes.

I don’t think I could bring myself to go against the guidelines by my board recommends. It would be like an anesthesiologist scoffing at NPO guidelines, even though aspiration is an extremely rare event.
Click to expand...
My point exactly

Holding ASA for an epidural is asinine.

We are not talking about NPO orders here
 
SSdoc33 said:
My point exactly

Holding ASA for an epidural is asinine.

We are not talking about NPO orders here
Click to expand...
NPO orders feel similar to me.

very rare event with potential for significant harm to patient if aspiration occurs. Not based on great evidence, but we are held to ASA guidelines. Just because some other society makes different guidelines, say for instance the ER physician guidelines in sedation and NPO, doesn’t mean an anesthesiogidt can ever defend giving sedation to a full stomach hip dislocation and reduction in the ED.
 
Is there a PMR society or neurology society that has recommendations about anticoagulation and epidurals?
 
dipriMAN said:
NPO orders feel similar to me.

very rare event with potential for significant harm to patient if aspiration occurs. Not based on great evidence, but we are held to ASA guidelines. Just because some other society makes different guidelines, say for instance the ER physician guidelines in sedation and NPO, doesn’t mean an anesthesiogidt can ever defend giving sedation to a full stomach hip dislocation and reduction in the ED.
Click to expand...

You dont have a heart attack if you skip breakfast. That's the difference. There is inherent risk is holding blood thinners
 
Ludicrous to stop blood thinners for a caudal or lower lumbar TFESI.

No one has argued for ILESI on thinners.
 
I don’t think of ASRA being the definitive pain society which is what several of you are implying.
 
BobBarker said:
I don’t think of ASRA being the definitive pain society which is what several of you are implying.
Click to expand...
As an anesthesiologist not following the ASRA guidelines is indefensible, even if they’re guidelines are outdated. They are the society that grants me board certification.
 
SSdoc33 said:
You dont have a heart attack if you skip breakfast. That's the difference. There is inherent risk is holding blood thinners
Click to expand...
What about the risk of delaying a procedure that requires sedation due to NPO.
 
dipriMAN said:
As an anesthesiologist not following the ASRA guidelines is indefensible, even if they’re guidelines are outdated. They are the society that grants me board certification.
Click to expand...
I suppose it’s easier to ignore ASRA as a PMR/Pain physician.

I do feel the SIS guidelines are the most applicable to the real world practice of interventional spine procedures.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

I
Cervical mbb and RFA best approach?
Replies
36
Views
3K
Gnarvin
G
M
MBB and RFA
Replies
28
Views
3K
lobelsteve
lobelsteve
giddyup
MBB results
2
Replies
67
Views
4K
po_boy
P
H
Lumbosacral RFA Benefit
2
Replies
64
Views
9K
painisfear
P
C
MBB/RFA approval after fusion?
Replies
16
Views
3K
drrosenrosen
drrosenrosen
Top Bottom