Toenails. You don't have to cut them. Trust me. Just say no.

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

air bud

I am a dog and play basketball
15+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
4,497
Reaction score
7,371
Don't do it. It's a not a service you offer. Don't do it. History of amputation and /or revascularization ok I will. Otherwise go to another podiatrist. It will be ok. There are other patients. Trust me. Don't do it.

Nails. Always nails.

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Birds gotta fly
Fish gotta swim
Lobsters gotta scuttle
Pods gotta trim
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Care
Reactions: 17 users
Members don't see this ad :)
Yes don’t cut nails.


Send all your nails to me

886C4B58-051E-45C0-B29A-982A8E742D39.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
I'm going to go the direct opposite direction:

1) I'll cut toenails, and calluses. Send them all to me.
2) I do wound care and not always amputate
3) I do custom orthotics frequently, and love doing them. I've used amazon inserts before and far prefer custom orthotics.

Also I love my job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
I'm going to go the direct opposite direction:

1) I'll cut toenails, and calluses. Send them all to me.
2) I do wound care and not always amputate
3) I do custom orthotics frequently, and love doing them. I've used amazon inserts before and far prefer custom orthotics.

Also I love my job.
FC689211-4CD8-456B-A1B8-C1405780B820.jpeg
 
I'm going to go the direct opposite direction:

1) I'll cut toenails, and calluses. Send them all to me.
2) I do wound care and not always amputate
3) I do custom orthotics frequently, and love doing them. I've used amazon inserts before and far prefer custom orthotics.

Also I love my job.

My man. I too love these pathologies, and patients often seek me out for these specific treatments. My practice has grown beyond my wildest dreams. Keep feeding me. Let me "cook" as the young kids say.

Thank you
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users
My man. I too love these pathologies, and patients often seek me out for these specific treatments. My practice has grown beyond my wildest dreams. Keep feeding me. Let me "cook" as the young kids say.

Thank you
My man, welcome back.
 
Nails and calluses all day every day.
- No overhead costs
- No paying staff
- Copy paste every note
- No call
- No surgery follow ups
- Get to work outside in the park and get full vitamin D everyday
- No cleaning necessary
- Wind blows away nail dust from my face

Skills easily transfer to nail salon manager when medicare reimbursement stops.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Nails and calluses all day every day.
- No overhead costs
- No paying staff
- Copy paste every note
- No call
- No surgery follow ups
- Get to work outside in the park and get full vitamin D everyday
- No cleaning necessary
- Wind blows away nail dust from my face

Skills easily transfer to nail salon manager when medicare reimbursement stops.

You practice in a park?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Nails and calluses all day every day.
- No overhead costs
- No paying staff
- Copy paste every note
- No call
- No surgery follow ups
- Get to work outside in the park and get full vitamin D everyday
- No cleaning necessary
- Wind blows away nail dust from my face

Skills easily transfer to nail salon manager when medicare reimbursement stops.
Season 9 Nbc GIF by The Office
 
I cut toenails at outreach clinics because I don’t want these smaller hospitals to get pissed or else they won’t send me the MSK stuff.

I take all comers. Somehow non diabetic footcare still gets me RVU credit. Whether the hospital makes any money on it I can’t tell you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
The problem with trimming toenails is that it's like sex work.

I can already hear airbud and heybrother meming the hell out of this post, but I'm damn serious.

Anyone can do it, there's little talent and no intellect involved. On the one hand it's revolting and degrading. No parent would want this job for their kids. On the other hand there's money to be made, some build significant wealth. But material gain will only motivate you so much.

Then there are the more insidious effects on the person's psyche and relationships. If a woman works a day job as, say, a librarian, but on weekends she provides "content" online, is she a librarian who creates content? Or is she a content provider who works as a librarian? Does her day job even matter? For her self identity? For how she is perceived by others?

Same thing with us. Are we doctors who cut toenails? Or are we nail cutters who sometimes do actual doctoring? How many of us have surgically managed patients who ask us at some point along the way to trim their toenails? Why would they expect this? Why do they think it's an appropriate question? The more toenails we cut, the more it consumes our professional identity. There is no doctor-patient relationship, only transactions.

I should offer a caveat, there are plenty of nice politically correct arguments that sex work is real work, and we could probably retool those same arguments that nail care is real care. And that's my real intent here, not to critique anyone for plying their trade, just to draw the parallel.

However, sometimes economic realities force us into things. Airbud says there are other patients. I'm not so sure. We're up to 11 schools now, but not much else to be done for the foot. I cut toenails not because I choose to, but because I don't have any choice. I dream of quiet quitting and just telling all my toenail clients to f off so I can spend my days rendering actual care. The result would just be empty space on my schedule. So I continue on, a shoe-er of the unshod, a reducer of all things thick and mycotic. 🦞👑
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 9 users
The problem with trimming toenails is that it's like sex work.

I can already hear airbud and heybrother meming the hell out of this post, but I'm damn serious.

Anyone can do it, there's little talent and no intellect involved. On the one hand it's revolting and degrading. No parent would want this job for their kids. On the other hand there's money to be made, some build significant wealth. But material gain will only motivate you so much.

Then there are the more insidious effects on the person's psyche and relationships. If a woman works a day job as, say, a librarian, but on weekends she provides "content" online, is she a librarian who creates content? Or is she a content provider who works as a librarian? Does her day job even matter? For her self identity? For how she is perceived by others?

Same thing with us. Are we doctors who cut toenails? Or are we nail cutters who sometimes do actual doctoring? How many of us have surgically managed patients who ask us at some point along the way to trim their toenails? Why would they expect this? Why do they think it's an appropriate question? The more toenails we cut, the more it consumes our professional identity. There is no doctor-patient relationship, only transactions.

I should offer a caveat, there are plenty of nice politically correct arguments that sex work is real work, and we could probably retool those same arguments that nail care is real care. And that's my real intent here, not to critique anyone for plying their trade, just to draw the parallel.

However, sometimes economic realities force us into things. Airbud says there are other patients. I'm not so sure. We're up to 11 schools now, but not much else to be done for the foot. I cut toenails not because I choose to, but because I don't have any choice. I dream of quiet quitting and just telling all my toenail clients to f off so I can spend my days rendering actual care. The result would just be empty space on my schedule. So I continue on, a shoe-er of the unshod, a reducer of all things thick and mycotic. 🦞👑
They expect it because their previous mustache podiatrist told them it is medically necessary. A lot of these mustache podiatrists still practice intermingled with the 3 year trained podiatrists who don't use the P-word and only describe themselves as foot and ankle surgeons.

It will take 20-30 year until this expectation dies off. Then within our lifetimes nurses will be the ones doing nail care
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
It will take 20-30 year until this expectation dies off. Then within our lifetimes nurses will be the ones doing nail care
Hopefully you are correct, This might be a more a more bold prediction than cars only being built without steering wheels in 20-30 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I am saying it is not medically indicated in the vast vast majority of instances, thus medicare fraud. this is all. I cut toenails on diabetic vasculopathic neuropathic patients with a history of amputation. happily do so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
They expect it because their previous mustache podiatrist told them it is medically necessary. A lot of these mustache podiatrists still practice intermingled with the 3 year trained podiatrists who don't use the P-word and only describe themselves as foot and ankle surgeons.

It will take 20-30 year until this expectation dies off. Then within our lifetimes nurses will be the ones doing nail care
just had a guy tell me his pod in california told him not to cut his own toenails, too dangerous. Saw him every 65 days. 5.8 A1C, no neuropathy, great pulses no deformity. Transferred to my location. I told him he can do his own, he is fine, explained the rules, risks. He was beyond relieved that he didn't need to deal with appts and this crap anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I am saying it is not medically indicated in the vast vast majority of instances, thus medicare fraud. this is all. I cut toenails on diabetic vasculopathic neuropathic patients with a history of amputation. happily do so.

IMO it’s not really about the nails but the fact that they’re at risk being neuropathic and/or vasculopath for ulcer formation and those routine visits are good for checking up on them.

Almost all my nail patients I’ve been able to catch and prevent ulcers at some point. And those who don’t follow up regularly will sometimes show up with nasty wounds out of the blue wishing they came in sooner.

Prevention is the goal, not waiting until your nail nurse calls you to say the patient showed up with a wound already probing to bone and now needs to consult with you for an amputation
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
IMO it’s not really about the nails but the fact that they’re at risk being neuropathic and/or vasculopath for ulcer formation and those routine visits are good for checking up on them.

Almost all my nail patients I’ve been able to catch and prevent ulcers at some point. And those who don’t follow up regularly will sometimes show up with nasty wounds out of the blue wishing they came in sooner.

Prevention is the goal, not waiting until your nail nurse calls you to say the patient showed up with a wound already probing to bone and now needs to consult with you for an amputation
I am saying it is a very small percent that are truly vasculopathic. like limited arterial flow. i don't care if you are diabetic and neuropathic. pay attention, if indicated diabetic shoes. come see me if a problem or concerns.

arterial disease. truly making this patient at significant risk for healing if they were to attempt to perform nail care themselves.
 
IMO it’s not really about the nails but the fact that they’re at risk being neuropathic and/or vasculopath for ulcer formation and those routine visits are good for checking up on them.

Almost all my nail patients I’ve been able to catch and prevent ulcers at some point. And those who don’t follow up regularly will sometimes show up with nasty wounds out of the blue wishing they came in sooner.

Prevention is the goal, not waiting until your nail nurse calls you to say the patient showed up with a wound already probing to bone and now needs to consult with you for an amputation
I've had some good saves, but the pandemic very clearly demonstrated to me that most people will not ulcerate. I've had people who I thought were clearly high risk with neuropathy, poor perfusion, heavy callusing with deformity come back after a year without ulcerations. The best indication someone will ulcerate is in fact that they already ulcerated.

But since I like to see things both ways!
1705245990359.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I've had some good saves, but the pandemic very clearly demonstrated to me that most people will not ulcerate. I've had people who I thought were clearly high risk with neuropathy, poor perfusion, heavy callusing with deformity come back after a year without ulcerations. The best indication someone will ulcerate is in fact that they already ulcerated.

But since I like to see things both ways!
View attachment 381002
right. so surgery to prevent reulceration via gastroc, floating osteotomy, tendon transfer/lengthening. Boom. there you go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
You monster. If you eliminate the deformity there won't be a callus to trim with the nails.
similar mindset to the non-op provider in the wound care center....if you heal all the patients surgically how will I have patients to see?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
You monster. If you eliminate the deformity there won't be a callus to trim with the nails.
and even crazier would be to refer to vascular for evaluation. Holy crap this patient with absent pulses and significant infrapopliteal disease has flow again and no longer qualifies for RFC!!! oh the humanity. Get on that meme please.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
and even crazier would be to refer to vascular for evaluation. Holy crap this patient with absent pulses and significant infrapopliteal disease has flow again and no longer qualifies for RFC!!! oh the humanity. Get on that meme please.
Lol patient angry that you fixed their vascular flow so they no longer can get free nail trimmings
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Any thread on here discussing toenails quickly becomes the most popular, but at ACFAS there is standing room only for the TAR lectures…..because podiatry.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
Any thread on here discussing toenails quickly becomes the most popular, but at ACFAS there is standing room only for the TAR lectures…..because podiatry.
To be fair they are certainly less crowded these days. And much more MIS content. Ironically from MDs and forefoot related.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I know this thread was a joke, but toenails are not going away from podiatry. Ever.
Why? Money.

Money, money, money.
It makes money... and podiatry is known by both the public and the medical community as the specialty that does toenails. Podiatry was founded on nails and corns and shoe fitting. This is true both USA and worldwide.

Podiatry's saturated and getting more saturated and more expensive tuition every year now in USA, so people need to eat. Grads need work. We complain of the many $100k jobs for $400k debt, but it can always get worse. Look at the wretched mobile podiatry jobs to cut toenails without tilt chairs in a room smelling of wee-wee... hey, those podiatry jobs get filled too.

There's no way DPMs are going to collectively get rid of a pathology (onycho/RFT) that is very easy and fairly lucrative and almost no risk for med mal or on-call. We are far too saturated to "call our shots" or be selective. Do we think all of the pharmacists wanted to work for Walgreens and CVS chain pharmacies? It was a way to survive. Also, DPMs busting crusties is the quintessential lobster work that no other specialist is going to try to do anytime soon ever.

This has been best explained in meme forms back in 2022:
1669951808799-png.362731
(orig meme post)
1672197893815-png.363914
(orig meme post)

...Now, as for the somebody else being "the ones doing nail care," that someone has been - and will continue to be - podiatrists. It might be podiatrist associates in PP or the newest or least surgically-trained DPM guy in the hospital dept or whatever. Sometimes, it might be MAs with DPMs overseeing. Nurses and midlevels are far too expensive (relative to DPMs). They will get more expensive (relative to DPMs).

And yes, the pipe dream day that half the podiatry schools close and DPMs make decent doctor salary, maybe they will hire out techs or even RNs. Until then, podiatrists make too little. It makes no sense whatsoever for a hospital to have a $100k+ RN cutting nails (with nurse not billing nails solo) when they can hire a $200k-250k DPM to do that (and DPM can bill it without supervision) as well as DPM does much much more. Don't forget it's actually MUCH easier for a hospital or MSG to recruit that DPM than recruit the RN (for a job cutting nails). In PP podiatry, it is much cheaper to do the work oneself or to hire a DPM associate or have MAs do nails than to hire RN or NP or PA. Associate supply just keeps increasing thanks to new schools.

I am not saying there won't exist the odd hospital or ortho employ DPM who can pretend to be too busy for nail care and get his group/facility to believe that (likely bring in a non-op DPM or midlevel to do the nails). This is maybe <5% or likely <3% right now. However, even in those situations, that risks job security and likely lowers their pay (owners will consider nail person as part of DPM's overhead). The nail person is likely to eventually quit, and refusing nails also risks the group/hospital management will continue to be bombed with applications and cold calls of 'fellowship-trained' DPMs who will do the surgical DPM's job... and the nails too (and likely for less $$). Right now, we see job search nightmare threads; soon, we'll see threads of people losing their job or not getting the job because peers underbid (much like pharma and chiro).

In podiatry PP, assuming you don't love doing RFC visits (count me in), I think the best thing one can do is just not advertise or promote that nails/RFC part of their business (this assumes you have enough other work... and assumes you don't want to hire another DPM, so two big assumptions for most PP pods). That'll limit them, or you can train MAs if you're overrun with RFC and want to try that route. You'd be crazy to refuse the RFC appointments when they are referred by PCPs or find you direct or through your existing patients, though. You would lose refer sources and income stream if you don't offer RFC, which podiatry is clearly expected to offer in 100% of localities.

It's a fun thought, but toenails are not going away now or ever (nor should they) within podiatry. Money talks.
It's a saturation thing, but it's mainly money. New DPMs produced need work and need money.
Old DPMs aren't going to refuse money hiring associates or having work (many of old DPMs are still associates/employee also).

...economic realities force us into things. Airbud says there are other patients. I'm not so sure. We're up to 11 schools now, but not much else to be done for the foot. I cut toenails not because I choose to, but because I don't have any choice... The result would just be empty space on my schedule. So I continue on... 🦞👑
Yes.^^
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
There you go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Still saying nail care is built on a foundation of lies and Medicare fraud. They cant prosecute us all is a great defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Still saying nail care is built on a foundation of lies and Medicare fraud. They cant prosecute us all is a great defense.
Well, yeah... 100%... but don't be shortsighted.

You can't forget the Jublia and toenail clip pathology labs and Formula 83 and many APMA sponsors and 11720 lobbying attempts and assocaite dean positions so pecuniary and so intricately involved.
 
Still saying nail care is built on a foundation of lies and Medicare fraud. They cant prosecute us all is a great defense.

I agree nail care is, in most cases, not medically necessary, but in my experience it's rarely fraud. The q findings just aren't difficult to meet. I am doubtful the requirements to meet q findings are going to become more strict given how active seniors are in voting. Additionally the idea that the average PP pod could just stop seeing nails is not based on financial reality. My practice has quite a few docs and we do a fair amount of surgery/woundcare/etc but if we dumped the RFC we could probably cut our providers in half. More than likely reimbursement will just continue to slowly be whittled away one day it is not worth the PP pod's time.

I still think a good vision for podiatry's future would be to get Medicare approval for nail techs supervised by a DPM and then cut student enrollment. This would allow the non-op pods to command an army of nail techs and make a decent living, while also meeting the one area of true expanding demand for podiatry services. Meanwhile the surgical pods would have increased demand due to fewer part time surgeons and not have to deal with busting crusties.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
I agree nail care is, in most cases, not medically necessary, but in my experience it's rarely fraud.
Billing non medically necessary care = fraud.

Cosmetic care is not medically necessary.

More than likely reimbursement will just continue to slowly be whittled away one day it is not worth the PP pod's time.
And $48 for a nail trim isnt the floor of awful already? For commercial payers I have some under $40. I dont reappoint these patients and hope they disappear. Most of the time they no-show / reschedule anyway.
 
  • Like
  • Hmm
Reactions: 2 users
I agree nail care is, in most cases, not medically necessary, but in my experience it's rarely fraud.

Billing non medically necessary care = fraud.
Trimming nails is medically necessary the same way that routinely ordering radiographs for patients with chronic heel pain is medically necessary. It's medically necessary the same way that a pt's 2am walk-in visit to the ED for his chronic back pain is medically necessary. These are all medically necessary in the sense that they satisfy criteria to be considered covered medical benefits, but simultaneously are not life-sustaining treatments as they confer little actual benefit to the patient.
 
Trimming nails is medically necessary the same way that routinely ordering radiographs for patients with chronic heel pain is medically necessary. It's medically necessary the same way that a pt's 2am walk-in visit to the ED for his chronic back pain is medically necessary. These are all medically necessary in the sense that they satisfy criteria to be considered covered medical benefits, but simultaneously are not life-sustaining treatments as they confer little actual benefit to the patient.
I don't order x-rays for heel pain....ever at 1st visit unless some crazy history. PF until proven otherwise. I am doing my part. In fact I rarely order x-rays. PT insertion pain? No x-ray, boot and steroid. Neuroma? No x-ray and inject. Achilles pain? No x-ray and boot steroids. Pain 3rd 4th met base no x-ray and boot vitamin D.
PP bros needing to pay for that expensive x-ray machine is who is ordering that crap.

To go on. Ankle gutter pain? Inject. Sinus tarsi pain? Inject. Peroneal pain? Boot and steroids.

When they come back the second visit and no better? Then I will get an x-ray. Rural outreach clinics with no x-ray teaches you how little you need it. Sure, every once in awhile you get burned. Recently had an 80-year-old dude that I diagnosed with Achilles tendonitis. Literally right at the insertion skin looked normal it was just really swollen and painful. No history.... Comes back about 2 weeks later said he was having some pain went to a local urgent Care they took an x-ray and there is a gigantic metal wire stuck almost all the way into his calc. No idea how he got it. Looked at it and said okay guess we're going to the or incision spread the Achilles part grab it with a pair of pliers irrigate close it back up good to go. Sure stuff like that's going to happen but that's not going to make me start ordering x-rays on everybody unnecessarily.
 
So then we do agree, there in fact exist treatments that are medically unnecessary but still reimbursable...like trimming toenails
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
The data below is from the machine searchable fee schedule data on airbud's hospitals website. Sadly not all relevant codes are available.

1705360884327.png
 
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
The data below is from the machine searchable fee schedule data on airbud's hospitals website. Sadly not all relevant codes are available.

View attachment 381073
What the hell? 1000+ for a PF injection? PP reimbursements for those is like $100 if that.


Imagine talking down about PP billing when you’re working for the real criminals (hospital admin) at those billing rates. I wonder if these hospital employed pods ever tell their admin how bad that is.

..Nope.


But please continue on the crusade that billing $50 for nails deserves jail time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
What the hell? 1000+ for a PF injection? PP reimbursements for those is like $100 if that
Its quite eye opening and somewhat dumbfounding. My in town hospitals had some of their data freely available, but they ultimately locked it up and required you to enter your specific insurance information. One of my in town hospitals appeared to get $1000> for a 99203. I had a patient tell me terrified that their insurance was denying a $2500 facility fee schedule charge - for each visit, after they'd already been 4 times.

1705362029394.png
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 1 users
What the hell? 1000+ for a PF injection? PP reimbursements for those is like $100 if that.


Imagine talking down about PP billing when you’re working for the real criminals (hospital admin) at those billing rates.
Don't even try to understand hospital reimbursements... it'll only make you get a headache.
The only answers you will ever get are "facility fees" and "hospital billing is different."

I wonder if it's sustainable. Who knows, though.... maybe it will continue to work for the facilities awhile longer to get huge payments for simple things.

It's the same for XR foot or ankle 3 view set... PP (or MSG or ortho) gets under $50-$75 typically, and hospitals can charge moonshot and get paid $500-$1000+ for it. Neaby rad center gets maybe $300 from most payers. I am told this almost weekly by patients.

I would not doubt if 11721 is $35 for PP doc and $200+ for hospital also.

Oh, and ask your patients who have elective surgery at the hospital to see their EOB they get in the mail... assuming you want to be wtFFFFFFF. :)
 
  • Wow
Reactions: 1 user
Don't even try to understand hospital reimbursements... it'll only make you get a headache.
The only answers you will ever get are "facility fees" and "hospital billing is different."

I wonder if it's sustainable. Who knows, though.... maybe it will continue to work for the facilities awhile longer to get huge payments for simple things.

It's the same for XR foot or ankle 3 view set... PP (or MSG or ortho) gets under $50-$75 typically, and hospitals can charge moonshot and get paid $500-$1000+ for it. Neaby rad center gets maybe $300 from most payers. I am told this almost weekly by patients.

I would not doubt if 11721 is $35 for PP doc and $200+ for hospital also.

Oh, and ask your patients who have elective surgery at the hospital to see their EOB they get in the mail... assuming you want to be wtFFFFFFF. :)
I’ve had patients who tell me how expensive a hospital surgery was and get mad at me then I tell them I only get paid $250 from it or whatever, that usually shifts the direction of anger from doctor to hospital quick.

The facility fee thing is so dumb lol. As if PP doesn’t also pay for the building and staff.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I didn't post it, but the other fascinating thing is that for government payors the hospital receives the same reimbursement for all E&M visits ie 99212-99203-99213-99214-99205-etc are all worth $160ish. This is likely because the code they actually charge is the "hospital outpatient visit" code which private practices don't use.

And yeah, before it got locked up - the data for my hospitals in town suggested a 3V was $200-500 a foot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I’ve had patients who tell me how expensive a hospital surgery was and get mad at me then I tell them I only get paid $250 from it or whatever, that usually shifts the direction of anger from doctor to hospital quick
Yeah, how else do you think most hospital employ docs (assuming not a teaching hospital, where the residents/students see them) get away with seeing about 10 patients per day, spending more time in doc lounge than seeing patients and taking more time on vaca than in the OR? The elective surgery/proc and imaging or the high level visits and labs (IM docs) are huuuge markups in hospital setting. The volume of patients/surgery most hospital FTE docs see would be very slim profits or non-viable in PP.

I've considered the hospital employed route many times, but when I actually did it or explored it, I just can't stand the admin headaches (politics, staffing, supplies, schedule) and steering of your time and services (usually required on-call, required meetings and committees, press for HBOT, press for imaging, expect dinky procedures to OR, etc from podiatry). It's a drag.

...at the end of the day, you need to be happily cooperative with the hospitals when in PP, but you have so much more room to control your own office quality and can be "too busy" or "unaware" of most of the meetings, politics, and BS. You don't need to be totally in lock step, as you usually do being a hospital FTE. I think this is a major reason why (second only to $$$) that docs - any specialty - are typically mostly PP in good payer areas and mostly hospital employ in lower payer areas/counties/cities.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Top