- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
- Messages
- 1,440
- Reaction score
- 114
which UC schools would u consider the best for premeds (undergrad)?
which UC schools would u consider the best for premeds (undergrad)?
cal? is that a UC?
berkeley
i didn't know it was also referred to as cal. anyone know why?
i didn't know it was also referred to as cal. anyone know why?
i didn't know it was also referred to as cal. anyone know why?
yea, i thought the same thing as fujiapple
Actually, most non-CA residents I've met refer to the school as Cal since that's how sports broadcasters refer to it on national TV.
i didn't know it was also referred to as cal. anyone know why?
I was surprised to see that on the AAMC data for class 2006 that UCSB had so many applicants. A guy I went to HS with graduated from 'SB and is a Yale MD/PhD now...
Berkely (I call the school Berkeley, but use Cal when referring to athletics) is over UCLA, but not by too much, depending on department. UCSB is known as somewhat of a party school. They indeed pump out some very succesfull grads (and Jack Johnson!) but there's still the rep to contend with.
Depending on what department? Are you kidding me? I doubt UCLA has as many top science programs as Cal.
Look at Cal's graduate programs most are Top 5 and many are the top 1 or 2 in the nation. If you want options there is no better University than Cal. It will get you where you want to be as long as you are willing to work for it.
i'm applying to:
1. UCLA
2. UC Berkeley
3. UC Davis
4. UC Irvine
5. UC San Diego
in order or preference. i was wondering how other people ranked the UCs.
I'm going to have to say there's no significant benefit of going to UCSB in the application process.lol, if you're pre-med you'd gotta be nuts to go to davis or irvine over SD. I'm surprised SB has gotten so little love on this thread, i met TONS of UCSB grads interviewing at top schools but not really from irvine or davis. Of course, there is a bit of randomness that could skew this observation, but it was prominent enough for me to take note.
lol, if you're pre-med you'd gotta be nuts to go to davis or irvine over SD. I'm surprised SB has gotten so little love on this thread, i met TONS of UCSB grads interviewing at top schools but not really from irvine or davis. Of course, there is a bit of randomness that could skew this observation, but it was prominent enough for me to take note.
I can see why some people prefer Irvine or Davis over San Diego. Somehow I hear a lot of people saying that San Diego is hard and the students there are usually unhappy/overstressed. So it is understandable someone would choose Irvine or Davis over SD. Plus, some people have family/significant others living in Irvine or Davis and rather go there more than SD. So don't call others nuts just because they don't agree with your preferences.
lol, if you're pre-med you'd gotta be nuts to go to davis or irvine over SD. I'm surprised SB has gotten so little love on this thread, i met TONS of UCSB grads interviewing at top schools but not really from irvine or davis. Of course, there is a bit of randomness that could skew this observation, but it was prominent enough for me to take note.
which UC schools would u consider the best for premeds (undergrad)?
UCSF is not Cal's med school. If you're using the logic of the UC's that have med schools, you'll need to drop Berkeley off the list. The only relationships they have between them are based on the fact that they're only 15 miles apart.The obvious answer is the 5 UCs that have medical schools.
UCB(UCSF)
UCLA
UCSD
UCD
UCI
Having an affliated medical school is very helpful to a premed.
UCSF is not Cal's med school. If you're using the logic of the UC's that have med schools, you'll need to drop Berkeley off the list. The only relationships they have between them are based on the fact that they're only 15 miles apart.
All UCs cooperate and many have joint programs. I think it's a stretch to consider Cal and UCSF any closer related than any other two UCs that close geographically.While they are not officially affliated, I consider them de facto affiliated.
All UCs cooperate and many have joint programs. I think it's a stretch to consider Cal and UCSF any closer related than any other two UCs that close geographically.
No biggie, but considering UCB to have a med school since it is near one is a bit of a stretch and not one the school would ever make.
Using that logic, you'd have to add UCR, since it's near UCLA. And in fact, UCR has a linikage program with UCLA as well.
UCSF is not Cal's med school. If you're using the logic of the UC's that have med schools, you'll need to drop Berkeley off the list. The only relationships they have between them are based on the fact that they're only 15 miles apart.
That's right. Cept irvine bought that DO school, lol.If you learn the history of UCSF, youll realize that it was purchased by the University of California to be its medical campus. Subsequent UC's had to build their own medical campuses from scratch. That is short is why, for all intents and purposes, UCSF is cal's "medical school". And besides, there is the JMP UCSF/UCB program.
All UCs cooperate and many have joint programs. I think it's a stretch to consider Cal and UCSF any closer related than any other two UCs that close geographically.
UCSF Website said:Meanwhile, the University of California moved from Oakland to its permanent campus at Berkeley in the summer of 1873. Negotiations for transfer of the medical school, however, were complicated by the University's unwillingness to accommodate Toland's demand that the medical school continue to bear his name.
In March 1873, the trustees deeded the Toland Medical College to the University Regents and the faculty minutes for the first time bore the heading, "The Medical Department of the University of California." R. Beverly Cole became the dean and twenty-seven students were enrolled in the first class.