- Joined
- Dec 1, 2011
- Messages
- 18,579
- Reaction score
- 57
A beam positioned on a fulcrum is 6m long. It has a weight of 300N attached to one end and a weight of 250N attached to the other. To establish mechanical equilibrium, the fulcrum must be placed:
A: 2.87m from the 250-N weight
B. 3.00m from the 250-N weight
C. 3.27m from the 250-N weight
D. 5.67m from the 250-N weight.
Intuitively the answer is obviously C, but I don't understand the reasoning behind some of the math.
For an object to be in equilibrium, net force = 0 and net torque = 0, so the sum of the torques must be 0. In this problem, the torques are (250N)(X) and (300N)(6-X).
TBR shows this:
SumT=T250N + T350N = 0
SumT=(250N)(X) - (300N)(6-X) = 0
After doing the math, you find that you need to subtract one of the torques in order for the X to come out as a positive value, but why do you automatically take the difference in the beginning?
I don't understand why your initial equation in solving this isn't 250NX+300N(6-X) = 0
A: 2.87m from the 250-N weight
B. 3.00m from the 250-N weight
C. 3.27m from the 250-N weight
D. 5.67m from the 250-N weight.
Intuitively the answer is obviously C, but I don't understand the reasoning behind some of the math.
For an object to be in equilibrium, net force = 0 and net torque = 0, so the sum of the torques must be 0. In this problem, the torques are (250N)(X) and (300N)(6-X).
TBR shows this:
SumT=T250N + T350N = 0
SumT=(250N)(X) - (300N)(6-X) = 0
After doing the math, you find that you need to subtract one of the torques in order for the X to come out as a positive value, but why do you automatically take the difference in the beginning?
I don't understand why your initial equation in solving this isn't 250NX+300N(6-X) = 0