- Joined
- Dec 9, 2005
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey sdn mcaters,
I know I've seen a thread on this forum about these exams, but I can't seem to find them now.
The end of the tests explains that the science portions are more difficult on the TPR than the actual MCAT, but what they don't tell you is why it is more difficult. Are the questions more demanding (intellectually)? Or is the content more specific? Maybe the passages are more confusing, yield less useful detail...etc.
Also, am I correct in understanding that the 15-point scale depends on the distribution of points for a given test? If so, then it seems ridiculous to suggest that one scale is of any use in estimation of another exam, especially since TPR admits that their tests are written differently (or at least, such that they're more difficult [whatever that means]).
For those of you who have recently taken an official MCAT and also studied from TPR's practice tests (namely A-D), what do you think? If TPR's tests and scores can be trusted to be at least indicative of performance on the big show, how off might one expect them to be, and why?
DK
I know I've seen a thread on this forum about these exams, but I can't seem to find them now.
The end of the tests explains that the science portions are more difficult on the TPR than the actual MCAT, but what they don't tell you is why it is more difficult. Are the questions more demanding (intellectually)? Or is the content more specific? Maybe the passages are more confusing, yield less useful detail...etc.
Also, am I correct in understanding that the 15-point scale depends on the distribution of points for a given test? If so, then it seems ridiculous to suggest that one scale is of any use in estimation of another exam, especially since TPR admits that their tests are written differently (or at least, such that they're more difficult [whatever that means]).
For those of you who have recently taken an official MCAT and also studied from TPR's practice tests (namely A-D), what do you think? If TPR's tests and scores can be trusted to be at least indicative of performance on the big show, how off might one expect them to be, and why?
DK