Trial Lawyers at it again-Frivolous Cases and the Need for a 250k Cap

  • Please review the updated member agreement. Included is a new statement supporting the scientific method and evidence-based medicine. Claims or statements about disease processes should reference widely accepted scientific resources. Theoretical medical speculation is encouraged as part of the overall scientific process. However, unscientific statements that promote unfounded ideological positions or agendas may be removed.

JohnHolmes

Large Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Dec 30, 2003
3,207
3
38
Visit site
Status
This is why I love trial lawyers and you should too! Pennsylvania has no cap, this frivolous case never would have been filed had MICRA laws been in place.

JH

Pennsylvania pap smear lawsuit dismissed


PITTSBURGH, Pennsylvania (AP) -- A judge dismissed a lawsuit that claimed thousands of Pap smears at the University of Pittsburgh's Magee-Womens Hospital were faulty or never reviewed by doctors.

Judge Robert P. Horgos ruled Thursday the women involved suffered no physical harm, and fear of being at increased risk of serious medical illness isn't enough to warrant recovery of damages.

"The gist of (the suit) is that a physician's reproduced signature appeared on the Pap smear report when a cytotechnologist actually reviewed the Pap smear," Horgos wrote.

Cytotechnologists are medical professionals trained to analyze Pap smears. When a cytotechnologist sees a discrepancy, a pathologist is notified, which is accepted practice, said hospital attorney William Pietragallo.

An attorney for plaintiffs Christine Walter and Sharon King called the ruling "a sad day for women in Pittsburgh."

The women had accused the hospital of negligence, fraud and unjust enrichment and were also seeking court-ordered testing for an estimated 40,000 women who had Pap smears between 1995 and 2001.
 

JohnHolmes

Large Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Dec 30, 2003
3,207
3
38
Visit site
Status
juddson said:
Looks to me like this is a posterchild case for how the system WORKS!!!!!

Anyway, know the facts

http://www.citizen.org/documents/Fi...ISDIAGNOSIS.pdf

Judd
Judd, this wouldn't be a malpractice thread without your posts. Welcome to the thread.

Your link is dead, btw.

I agree, the system "worked" in the sense it was thrown out. However, you overlooked upon the fact this case was filed in Pennsylvania (one such state that allows frivolous cases to go with little disincentive); the cost of defending them is driving up malpractice cases as well. It is the sheer fact that this case was filed that is cause for concern. The fact the judge threw it out is common sense.

BTW, I was up at Columbia this weekend and stayed with some law students. Sage is running a class next semester called "Medicine and Law". P&S requires a humanities in medicine credit to graduate at the end of the second year; if I go there, it would be interesting to take this class.

CCW
 
About the Ads