- Joined
- May 9, 2006
- Messages
- 1,422
- Reaction score
- 6
University of Pittsburgh versus University of Chicago - Pritzker
what do you folks think about this one? i searched, and the only comparison thread i found was from two years ago and didn't pack a lot of information. so let's do a comparison here for myself and other sdn-ers in this position.
i'll start. i'm fairly familiar with chicago, but only visited pittsburgh for a couple days during my interview. here's what i think:
*academics*: i don't see how one is much better than the other in this category. both med schools seem to be about the same caliber with a big academic med/research emphasis. i think pritzker would have a more ethnically diverse pt population (more african-americans and latin americans) than pitt, but i'm not sure how much this really matters for med school clinical training. it seems nice that pitt is the big med center for the region, whereas pritzker competes with nwu for complex cases--again, not sure how much that matters as a med student. pritzker is p/f for first two years with aoa being determined only based on more traditional third-year evaluations, while i *think* pitt is h/p/f all four years. pritzker seems to have a lot of class time in the preclinical years, with essay-style exams. so i'm not sure if one is more stressful or competitive than the other. i think pritzker does have at least one rotation in a suburban hospital, so that's a bit of a turn-off since i won't have a car. anyone know if one has better clinical training than the other? pritzker's 2007 match list did seem pretty phenomenal to me. is it head-and-shoulders better than pitt's? and while both are on the campus of their main schools, u of chicago overall has better graduate programs than u of pitt--but i don't think that matters to me, personally (not going for a dual degree).
*student life*: i personally got a better vibe at pitt, but my vibes are based off of brief visits. the students seemed a bit happier to me at pitt. they also have a student lounge (i don't think pritzker does) and they're about to finish building a med school dorm (pritzker doesnt' have this), so it *seems* that pitt might have a more cohesive student body but this is only an inference. any comments on this?
*city*: i think chicago is the better city overall, but u pitt seemed to be in a much nicer part of pittsburgh compared to u of chicago's location in chicago. to get to the fun stuff in chicago, one would have to travel 30 minutes by car or over an hour by bus/train, while the more limited fun stuff in pittsburgh is down the street or a short (and free!) bus ride away. there also seemed to be a better variety of restaurants and other hang-out spots in the vicinity of u of pitt compared to u of chicago. other universities and students in the immediate area, too. since i won't have a car, this seems nice. pittsburgh is cheaper than chicago, which is also nice. pittsburgh is also more scenic (i think. large bodies of water don't do much for me), with better outdoor opportunities in the region. i'm not sure which city is more bearable in terms of weather. statistically, pittsburgh has more cloudy days, but the temperature is a little warmer throughout the year and they have less windchill. and please correct this if i'm wrong, but i was suprised to find more of an "east coast" vibe in pittsburgh than i expected--pretty much a vague feeling that people were more on-the-go. so i'm leaning toward pitt in this category, but it's again based off a brief visit at a nice time of the year.
other viewpoints, please!
what do you folks think about this one? i searched, and the only comparison thread i found was from two years ago and didn't pack a lot of information. so let's do a comparison here for myself and other sdn-ers in this position.
i'll start. i'm fairly familiar with chicago, but only visited pittsburgh for a couple days during my interview. here's what i think:
*academics*: i don't see how one is much better than the other in this category. both med schools seem to be about the same caliber with a big academic med/research emphasis. i think pritzker would have a more ethnically diverse pt population (more african-americans and latin americans) than pitt, but i'm not sure how much this really matters for med school clinical training. it seems nice that pitt is the big med center for the region, whereas pritzker competes with nwu for complex cases--again, not sure how much that matters as a med student. pritzker is p/f for first two years with aoa being determined only based on more traditional third-year evaluations, while i *think* pitt is h/p/f all four years. pritzker seems to have a lot of class time in the preclinical years, with essay-style exams. so i'm not sure if one is more stressful or competitive than the other. i think pritzker does have at least one rotation in a suburban hospital, so that's a bit of a turn-off since i won't have a car. anyone know if one has better clinical training than the other? pritzker's 2007 match list did seem pretty phenomenal to me. is it head-and-shoulders better than pitt's? and while both are on the campus of their main schools, u of chicago overall has better graduate programs than u of pitt--but i don't think that matters to me, personally (not going for a dual degree).
*student life*: i personally got a better vibe at pitt, but my vibes are based off of brief visits. the students seemed a bit happier to me at pitt. they also have a student lounge (i don't think pritzker does) and they're about to finish building a med school dorm (pritzker doesnt' have this), so it *seems* that pitt might have a more cohesive student body but this is only an inference. any comments on this?
*city*: i think chicago is the better city overall, but u pitt seemed to be in a much nicer part of pittsburgh compared to u of chicago's location in chicago. to get to the fun stuff in chicago, one would have to travel 30 minutes by car or over an hour by bus/train, while the more limited fun stuff in pittsburgh is down the street or a short (and free!) bus ride away. there also seemed to be a better variety of restaurants and other hang-out spots in the vicinity of u of pitt compared to u of chicago. other universities and students in the immediate area, too. since i won't have a car, this seems nice. pittsburgh is cheaper than chicago, which is also nice. pittsburgh is also more scenic (i think. large bodies of water don't do much for me), with better outdoor opportunities in the region. i'm not sure which city is more bearable in terms of weather. statistically, pittsburgh has more cloudy days, but the temperature is a little warmer throughout the year and they have less windchill. and please correct this if i'm wrong, but i was suprised to find more of an "east coast" vibe in pittsburgh than i expected--pretty much a vague feeling that people were more on-the-go. so i'm leaning toward pitt in this category, but it's again based off a brief visit at a nice time of the year.
other viewpoints, please!