OneTougherCookie
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2020
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 3
Hi everyone, a currently undecided student who currently has a "very good problem" in that I'm mulling over several great choices. I'm absolutely stunned to be in this kind of situation, but am having trouble objectively comparing these different opportunities and wanted to get some outside perspectives.
For some background, I'm originally raised in the Northeast, and plan to specialize in Psychiatry (with a specific focus on pediatric/adolescent psych). Have a big interest in health policy/interdisciplinary work as well. Also identify as queer which is relevant for some of the school decisions.
Mayo Clinic (MN)- 90% of Tuition Scholarship
Pros
Cons
UCLA- Full Tuition Scholarship + ~1/3 CoL covered by additional aid
Pros
Cons
Cornell- No FA info yet
Pros
Cons
TLDR: Mulling over price of attendance, slight differences in prestige, as well as concerns about accessibility/social scene as a queer person. Would love to hear your thoughts!
For some background, I'm originally raised in the Northeast, and plan to specialize in Psychiatry (with a specific focus on pediatric/adolescent psych). Have a big interest in health policy/interdisciplinary work as well. Also identify as queer which is relevant for some of the school decisions.
Mayo Clinic (MN)- 90% of Tuition Scholarship
Pros
- It's Mayo Clinic: Hard to argue with the name recognition and I know it (debateably) carries more weight than UCLA or Cornell.
- Arguably best resources offered among these programs (small class, nation's best clinic, etc.)
- Very solid financial aid package, only need to pay for CoL + 10% of tuition (estimating I end up with ~$120k in debt)
Cons
- Rochester: The weather is a pain but so is life. I'm more concerned about the social opportunities (especially opportunities to meet other queer people) in Rochester and don't like the idea of having to drive 90 min to Minneapolis to find something more engaging. Also seems extremely tough as someone who's single, with a limited dating scene (especially for queer people).
- It's only doctors: Mayo's great in that it's got some of the best medical training programs, but it seems like all the resources are centered around medicine. There's no other graduate schools that aren't directly tied to medicine and I feel like it'll be isolating to just be surrounded by people in the same field.
- Non-medicine opportunities: I've got a big interest in health policy/advocacy and it seems like Rochester doesn't really offer a lot of additional opportunities in non-medical fields. True, I could drive up to Minnesota if I wanted to do stuff in the state house, but it doesn't appear to have the same cross-disciplinary resources as other programs.
UCLA- Full Tuition Scholarship + ~1/3 CoL covered by additional aid
Pros
- Los Angeles: Obviously tons to do as a young person in the city, with tons of resources at my fingertips. Also the gorgeous weather is a nice plus.
- More cross-disciplinary stuff: It seems like it's easier to get outside of the medicine bubble at UCLA and it's even got a center dedicated to LGBTQ+ policy (one of the areas I've specialized in as a student).
- Better Area as a Queer Person: Mayo Clinic did not seem hostile by any means, but it definitely seems like Rochester being a small town puts a damper on the opportunities to engage with other queer folx. Much less of a problem at UCLA.
- Better FA package: Even with the higher CoL, UCLA gave me a better package overall (full tuition scholarship + extra need-based aid). Based on my estimates, it'd be ~$25k less debt than Mayo. Obviously not an astronomical difference in cost but still notable (especially as I want to go into a lower-paying specialty).
Cons
- Just a bit less name recognition: UCLA is highly ranked, but it's hard to not feel like I'm turning down a "Once In A Lifetime Opportunity" when looking away from Mayo Clinic. It may seem petty, but it's one of the biggest barriers for me.
- Having to own a car: Having to own a car as a medical student is something I've dreaded and it's pretty much mandatory at UCLA.
- Much Higher CoL: Granted this is well-mitigated by the better FA offer I got from UCLA, but there's obviously more pressure to save money and harder to live frugally in LA.
Cornell- No FA info yet
Pros
- NYC: Absolutely love the city and its resources, has the added bonus of not ever needing a car. Housing is also managed by the university which is a nice thing to not have to worry about. Would be closer to my friends/social network as they're based on the east coast.
- NYC will also be a great place to do stuff in policy/advocacy work.
- Vibes: I really connected with Cornell during my interview and its commitment to social justice was one of the strongest I saw. I've really connected with it overall and have had an easy time envisioning myself there.
- Great Area as a Queer Person: Similar advantage to UCLA + I already know several queer folx in the city. Cornell also stood out because they were the only institution I saw which had a queer-specific student-run clinic. As someone who wants to go into LGBTQ+ health, this is a big draw.
Cons
- Name Recognition: Cornell seems to have the weakest name recognition of the 3, which seems weird considering its placement in NYC and its connections to pretigious programs (ie. Sloan-Kettering, NY Presbyterian). I don't feel like having "Cornell" rather than "Mayo/UCLA" is going to get my residency application tossed out or anything, but it's hard to shake off the feeling of "downgrading" when compared to the other programs.
- FA Package: Currently don't have one, but get the feeling that the package might end up around the same cost as Mayo Clinic (or higher). If it's going to be significantly more expensive than the other programs that might be a deal breaker, but if it's in the same range as the others it would be a tough choice.
- Rose-Tinted Glasses: Cornell was one of my favorites during the interview process, but I've seen a lot of inconsistent reads on the happiness of their students/institutional culture. Worried that I might be misevaluating them because of a positive first interaction which wasn't representative.
TLDR: Mulling over price of attendance, slight differences in prestige, as well as concerns about accessibility/social scene as a queer person. Would love to hear your thoughts!