- Joined
- Dec 13, 2001
- Messages
- 57
- Reaction score
- 0
For those of you who are deciding between UCLA and UCSF, let me know where you are going and WHY? I have been struggling with this for a long time and I still cannot come up with a decision.
Originally posted by ducky:
•Hey Bruin2k,
Are you still deciding between UCLA/UCSF? I've been researching a lot about UCSF, and aside from the factors already listed, it seems to be the consensus that UCSF is a living hell for four years. It is an extremely competitive environment. I have talked to former professors and graduates. The former professors discouraged me away from UCSF, saying it is completely unorganized and no one knows who's coming or going. Former grads say the only advantage is cost (very cheap and the professors for the most part, treat you like you're an idiot and are very arrogant. I don't have any opinion on UCLA, so I don't know how similar the schools are. But UCSF has a great reputation, as does UCLA. I know quite a bit about UCSF, so feel free to ask me questions. If you know anything more or different, I'd be interested in hearing! Good luck! •••
Greetings, I am a graduate of UCSF. I finished 8 years ago. Just wanted to comment on your post, and dental school in general. I was 32 years old when I was entered UCSF. It was the only dental school I applied to. I was accepted without a Bachelor's degree (received my BSc while in dental school). I had a 3.98 gpa when I applied. Also, I had three children, the youngest was 7 months of age. In my junior year at UCSF I was elected class president. I feel very honored to be a graduate of this university. Yes, some of the professors were arrogant; but I think like any school you attend, professional school is part of the learning process. In terms of it being 4 years of "living hell", we had a great class, and we all bitched and moaned; I didn't feel it was a living hell. In terms of disorganization, there was a period of time when I was attending, that the state funding had dropped, and a few of the tenured faculty were retiring. New professors were hired, and the clinics relied quite a bit on "volunteer" faculty, which I did have a complaint about. Some of the volunteers wouldn't show up on the days they agreed to (I also was the student coordinator for the clinics), and it was particularly difficult trying to get instructor help and work completed. When I was there, we were graded daily in the clinics. I also found that there were problems getting state board patients, because the student body has to organize that; the school does not get involved on that level. Basically, after 4 years, UCSF not only teaches you to be highly technically skilled; You will pass the National and State boards with the highest scores.
To comment on the demographics of San Francisco vs. Los Angeles. Well we had ample patients to get UCR requirements completed. You don't need parking, because, really you shouldn't bring a car, if you are living in the city. In terms of housing, none of my classmates had difficulties with university housing. If you didn't get choice university housing within 2 blocks, Turk off campus housing had shuttles, and by their 3rd quarter, these students were where they wanted to be. The housing is actually very nice, remodelled million dollar victorians. There is also great married student housing as well. There is great public transportation, you don't jump on the freeway to get to places in San Francisco. You can take the trolleys very easily. Please feel free to email me with your questions, I am a good person to ask. All the Best, Kirsten. email: [email protected]
Originally posted by ayoon80:
•Hi Dr. Kitterman,
Thankyou for posting on this board! Your posts have been very informative. I was wondering if you specialized after graduating from ucsf? I am interested in going into orthodontics, however I heard that ucsf is incredibly competitive, and since you are assessed by class rank, I heard it was very difficult to get into a post-grad program. I'm not sure how ucsf would compare to ucla (which has pass/no pass) or other smaller private schools in this aspect. Your input would be greatly appreciated, thanks!•••
I have classmates who are orthodontists, UCSF will definitely help you. But so will developing good peer relationships and professional relationships with your instructors. You will need letters of recommendation, and so forth.
For some reason ortho seems to be a difficult specialty to get into, but my classmates didn't have any problems getting accepted. I chose an AEGD program, and was accepted no problem.
Originally posted by chocobo:
•I think I posted about this before, but UCLA's exams are not on a curve. At the beginning of the quarter, the instructor tells us what straight % we need to pass the class. So almost everyone passes with a normal P. To get EP (exceptional pass), it's usually curved so that maybe the top 5-10% of the class get EP.
I really do like this system of grading and my classmates seem to like this as well. We think it reduces the stress level during exam times. If you want EPs, you can focus on certain classes in which you think you can get EP. In the other classes, you can just try to study however much you need to pass the class, instead of having to worry about whether you're going to end up with a B or a C or whatever.•••
I still think that EP, (exceptional pass) for those considering to go onward to a specialty program, is still a competitive factor. However, I didn't go to UCLA, and I can't comment.
At UCSF, most of our exams were graded on a curve (thank god!), in terms of grades, I just didn't think the graded system was what instigated the competitive atmosphere. I think the fact that you are in a class with 80 people who were in the top 5% of the nation's applicant pool, is what contributed to the competitiveness. Again, you can "choose" to be non-competitive, and I did. My focus was my own education and completing the program successfully. Also, I was an "older" student, and didn't feel it that important to compete with other students. The fact is that I passed most of my test cases with a 98% or above, and I really didn't care what the guy next to me was doing.
The only question I have, is if you only concentrate on "passing" a class with what I assume to be 75% as a C, then how prepared do you feel to take the National Boards? And do you feel that you are competent in your didactic classes to apply your knowledge to the real world?
Only learning "enough" to pass a class sort of concerns me...