I think everything everybody hears is through word of mouth....I personally can't speak of people who I know directly going there, and who are happy....
but then again, how would i know if the same pple went to another school, that they wouldn't complain about that school either?
my point is, people who complain about school's curriculum, atmosphere and difficulty, could have made those complaints no matter which school they went to..
however, having said that...I've heard that among the UCs, UCSD has by far the hardest curriculum, but in terms of intensity, as well as difficulty and competition...
now in the long run, people do extremely well for their board exams...but their life is literally sucked dry out of them...
ok how about real life examples? for example at UCI, most professors give "old USMLE shelf exams" so at the same time you are preparing for the test, you are also indirectly preparing for the boards...
however, I remember my friend at UCSD, made these suggestions to the faculty, and they DID not at all responded well...in fact, UCSD still remains very traditional in the sense that they force feed you material that might not even be on the boards...on the basis that all these info are IMPORTANT and that you have to know it regardless on whether it is or not on the board exam!!!
that is all great, but knowing medical school...and how much competitive it is, and how much you have to cram...it's hard KNOWING EVERYTHING!!! and that is one of the biggest complaints my friend had about the school...
other complaints....
things that happened rarely:
1) classes rarely on saturdays
2) compared to UCLA, and UCSD (which is supposedly pass/no pass) UCSD, UCI (ucdavis i dont know) are honors/pass, no pass
3) for some reason, the student body that is present in UCSD's class seems more cutthroad and competitive than UCI or UCLA's for example....I don't know why, maybe they rely more on numbers for admittance?
either way, these are some of the complaints pple have!