Hi all, I am very lucky to have these two options but need some help deciding which place might be best for me. I'm not sure what specialty I'd like to go into (my interests range from primary care, surgery, and anesthesiology but also open to exploring more!). I'm also interested in pursuing academic medicine and possibly obtaining an MPH (interested in health policy/systems & disparities) as well.
UCSF:
PROS
CONS
HOPKINS:
PROS
CONS
I'm leaning towards Hopkins just because of the significantly better financial aid package. However, a part of me wants to challenge my comfort zone and pursue living in SF. Any thoughts/advice is appreciated!
UCSF:
PROS
- Great clinical program & research opportunities
- Loved the city (weather, food, lots of outdoors activities), would absolutely enjoy spending the next 4 years here
- All 4 years are P/F
- Got a really positive vibe from the students and faculty on interview day, it feels like there's less of a medical hierarchy compared to East coast institutions
- Lots of emphasis on improving health equity & health care delivery
CONS
- OOS, so debt based on financial aid package might be around $200K after 4 years
- High cost of living
- Have never lived on the west coast so it feels a bit daunting
- Would be farther away from family/support system
HOPKINS:
PROS
- Also great clinical program with an abundance of research
- Generous financial aid, about $70K in debt after 4 years
- Lower cost of living
- Familiar with Baltimore/surroundings (I've lived here the past 4 years )
- Closer to support system & family
CONS
- Would have to spend another 4 years in Baltimore (Although I'm not averse to Baltimore, it's not a place I'd like to live longterm)
- "Gunner" reputation
- A stronger focus on specialty care and less so on primary care
I'm leaning towards Hopkins just because of the significantly better financial aid package. However, a part of me wants to challenge my comfort zone and pursue living in SF. Any thoughts/advice is appreciated!