UT to rebuild UTMB

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

lowbudget

Full Member
7+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2003
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
34
Regents resolve to rebuild UTMB on the island

By Laura Elder
The Daily News
Published March 11, 2009

GALVESTON — Delivering some of the most promising news to the island since Hurricane Ike, the University of Texas System Board of Regents agreed Tuesday to work with the medical branch to restore the storm-damaged John Sealy Hospital, reopen a trauma center and build a new surgical tower — all in Galveston.

Regents, won over by a unified effort by residents and stakeholders to keep the hospital on the island, tossed aside a controversial recommendation by consultants to move most of the University of Texas Medical Branch’s hospital and clinical enterprises to League City.

News that regents essentially adopted what is now being dubbed the “Eiland plan” — named for state Rep. Craig Eiland, D-Galveston — sparked widespread rejoicing on an island still staggering from Hurricane Ike, which stuck Sept. 13, badly damaging John Sealy Hospital.

With the medical branch’s main source of income down, regents in November approved layoffs of thousands of employees and hardened many islanders’ suspicion that the board was indifferent to the Galveston institution.

In resolving to support a clinical strategy on the island, the regents rejected a recommendation issued last month by consultant Kurt Salmon Associates arguing the most economically viable plan for the medical branch was to move most hospital services to League City.

While the island mood was celebratory Tuesday, there was much work to do, officials cautioned.

‘Committed To UTMB’

Regents, who have also been criticized by some influential lawmakers for not fighting hard enough in seeking state support for the battered medical branch before approving job cuts, agreed to rebuild clinical operations on the island.

But although the UT System board, which governs nine universities and six health institutions, has clout in the Legislature, it can’t by itself wrangle funding for restoration of John Sealy Hospital and a new surgical tower.

“The board of regents and the UT System remain committed to

UTMB’s future,” said board Chairman H. Scott Caven Jr.

“The board cannot accomplish the ultimate goal of sustaining UTMB’s future alone, and it is important to note the shared responsibility that must exist with the board; the Legislature, local and federal offices; and the philanthropic community; and the necessity for a reliable, long-term source of operating funds from these extramural sources.”

528 beds

Financing the renovations and storm-hardening of the former 550-bed John Sealy Hospital won’t come without obstacles nor will it be immediate, officials say.

It could take five years and $266 million to get all of the 214 beds for the general public and another 100 for Texas Department of Criminal Justice inmates, who the medical branch treats through a state contract, officials said.

The surgical tower, which would provide another 214 modern rooms in which to teach medical students, would cost $438 million to build — about $2 million per bed — and also depends on financial commitments from state and federal governments and philanthropic organizations.

To get to 528 beds, the surgical tower is necessary. Storm surge swamped the first floor of John Sealy, knocking out the blood bank, pharmacy and other services. Renovating calls for moving services to higher floors, leaving less room for beds.

Restoring Trauma Services

The medical branch plans to restore trauma services at John Sealy in late June or early July.

But the new surgical tower, which could take several years to develop, would include a trauma center. Eventually, the medical branch intends to reopen a Level 1 trauma center, the highest designation, because all surgical specialties are on call, said medical branch President Dr. David Callender.

The island’s elite trauma center has been closed since the storm, an issue worrisome to locals and posing a burden to Houston trauma centers, which are seeing an increase of patients. But immediate medical branch plans call for opening a Level 2 or 3 trauma center.

“It’s hard for me to promise a Level 1 trauma center in a certain amount of time,” Callender said.

Plans also call for a commitment by local governments to help create a steady source of revenue, including the creation of hospital district that would tax residents, a prospect that won’t be an easy sell.

But Eiland, who some island residents were praising Tuesday, said the first hurdle would be securing state funding.

‘Definitely A Victory’

“I think it was definitely a victory,” Eiland said. “But obviously, if the Legislature doesn’t fund the plan, we’re back to square one. I’ll be happy in May to get funding for the construction and operations, which is the key to the plan laid out and the regents’ resolution.”

Convincing island or county residents to support hospital district would take a concerted effort.

“Let’s not worry about that until June,” said Eiland, who, as speaker pro tempore, is in the second highest leadership post in the Texas House.

The plans hinge on coming up with anywhere from $60 million to $100 million a year in new operating revenue from federal, state and local sources. That amount would give the medical branch a 1 percent operating margin — that is, put its revenues about 1 percent ahead of expenses, which is about half the margin a well funded not-for-profit hospital would have.

State Match

Funding the plan requires lawmakers to match federal dollars, and to also hold the medical branch harmless in the general revenue appropriations, an infusion of $140 million. In other words, lawmakers wouldn’t punish the medical branch by cutting funding for services stopped after the hurricane.

Eiland said he also hopes lawmakers approve a funding formula for John Sealy Hospital, which has reopened in a diminished capacity, that would help pay for indigent care. State support for indigent care at the island institution has dwindled as medical inflation has risen.

Also to help fund Eiland’s plan, lawmakers would have to allow the medical branch to keep the $90 million it earns in the federal Disproportionate Share Hospital Program, but which the state currently keeps.

On Feb. 20, four regents, part of a special task force, traveled to the island for a public hearing about the Kurt Salmon Report and the medical branch’s future. About 600 people attended the three-hour public hearing, marking a rare show of unity in their disdain for the consultant’s report.

‘Incredibly Supportive’

Task force members Tuesday told the full board they were impressed by the support for the medical branch — both by thoughtful pleas and in numbers.

Some members of the task force also expressed surprise by how much local financial support organizations offer the medical branch, particularly the 87-year-old Sealy & Smith Foundation, which has given the island hospital more than $600 million since its inception. The foundation’s charter require that it fund hospital initiatives on the island.

The regents’ decision to move ahead with restoration of John Sealy hospital and a new surgical tower marked one of brightest days for the island institution since the storm, Callender said.

“They were incredibly supportive of UTMB,” Callender said. “Everyone has worked so hard.”

+++

FEMA Support: $599.2 Million Net Of Insurance

($ millions); Cumulative FY10-FY19

John Sealy modernization/repairs (214 beds); $ (266.0)

Sealy & Smith Foundation; 77.0

FEMA reimbursement; 130.0

FEMA state match; 46.0

State capital support; 9.0

Other donors; 4.0

Jennie Sealy replacement (214 beds); (438.0)

Sealy & Smith Foundation; 75.0

State capital support; 141.0

UTMB debt; 172.0

TDCJ Hosp. mitigation/repairs (100 beds); (1.0)

UTMB debt; 1.0

Trauma Ctr. Equip. mitigation/repairs; (8.0)

FEMA reimbursement; 8.0

Other FEMA capital expenditures; (483.0)

Other FEMA reimbursement; 311.4

Other FEMA proceeds (state match); 103.8

Insurance proceeds ($67.8 rec’d. in FY09); --

Other projected capital expenditures; (1,008.7)

Net cash flows from (for) capital; $ (1,126.5)

SOURCE: University of Texas System Board of Regents

Members don't see this ad.
 
, the regents rejected a recommendation issued last month by consultant Kurt Salmon Associates arguing the most economically viable plan for the medical branch was to move most hospital services to League City.

*****s. Sure, experts can be wrong...fact is, the most probable future is that the institution will be short millions of dollars because they made this decision. Further, exactly what stops the next hurricane from wrecking the rebuilt hospital, doing hundreds of millions of dollars in damages? Does that mean it is a bad idea to go to UTMB medical school? Of course not, and Texas residents might as well apply to all of the schools in any case.

Still, this is stupid.
 
Does that mean it is a bad idea to go to UTMB medical school? Of course not, and Texas residents might as well apply to all of the schools in any case.
Going to UTMB is still obviously a better choice than going to Texas A&M, Texas Tech or UTHSCSA.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Not to cast aspersions on the school, but it seems like a really bad idea to keep investing in an area that gets routinely leveled by hurricanes.
 
Yes. :idea:

But seriously, the place is on a barrier island no more than 7 ft above sea level with one main way in and out. Moving the whole thing inland would've been cheaper than rebuilding where they were. If all goes according to plan, which relies on donations and federal and state appropriations over a decade, the UT system expects it to have only two months operating cash on hand by 2019.

I can see the reasons why they want to stay, but it seems much wiser to take your losses and stop investing in this area.
 
Agreed. The United States is a pretty big place, and it's silly to pour Federal money into propping up cities that aren't in a good location (New Orleans, I'm thinking of you). It's not like there aren't better locations.
 
Going to UTMB is still obviously a better choice than going to Texas A&M, Texas Tech or UTHSCSA.

Why is this pray tell? Because UTMB is where you got accepted?
 
*****s. Sure, experts can be wrong...fact is, the most probable future is that the institution will be short millions of dollars because they made this decision. Further, exactly what stops the next hurricane from wrecking the rebuilt hospital, doing hundreds of millions of dollars in damages? Does that mean it is a bad idea to go to UTMB medical school? Of course not, and Texas residents might as well apply to all of the schools in any case.

Still, this is stupid.

Rather strongly opinionated aren't we? The article says that a significant amount of money will be put forth for storm-hardening the new facilities. And services that were previously on the first floor of the hospital will be moved upward. I don't think this was just some random decision made on a lark. They generally do believe that UTMB can be successful in Galveston.

As for propping up cities in environmentally risky areas, whats wrong with that? UTMB went along with its business fine for over 100 years since the
1900 Galveston hurricane. Who's to say that it won't be another 100 years before another storm of that magnitude comes that? Should we just abandon coastal areas such as the Gulf Coast, all of Florida and the Outer Banks because of what could happen? (albeit could happen at a higher % chance) Why not just tear down all the buildings in the dust bowl so that they can't be ravaged by tornadoes or tear down all the skyscrapers in NYC so there aren't any more terrorist targets?

As someone who was born in John Sealy hospital and had parents work at UTMB for almost 30 years I think this is wonderful news.
 
Top