BurtFBIMacklin
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2019
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 0
I’m a re-applicant and non-trad, and made several mistakes in my first cycle, the biggest one being only applying to 5 schools. I received one interview and was waitlisted that cycle. Since that time I think I’ve improved my application significantly and will be applying to at least 20 schools this upcoming cycle.
I was a non-science major, completed a DIY post-bacc, and had no research experience on my last application. I only started volunteering in a research lab this past October and several months ago was hired in an adjacent lab as a research assistant. I never anticipated that I would like research, but I can’t imagine a career without it now.
I have nothing concrete to show for my research, just possibly a school-wide poster before June. I’m working on getting more data for a paper that should be submitted in the late summer, but of course I’ll have submitted my application before then.
To get to the point, I’d like to know whether it would be worth applying MD/PhD or if I should just apply MD. It seems to me that I don’t have the research chops yet to apply MD/PhD, but I now foresee myself wanting to run a lab someday on the basic-translational side of research and would like to have the dedicated, sustained time for research that a PhD allows. I don’t want to wait another year to get more research experience because my MCAT will no longer be accepted at most schools at that point.
Here’s how my GPA/MCAT/experiences size up:
ORM
CA resident
GPA: 4.0
MCAT: 521
Clinical experience: ~600 hours
Shadowing experience: 60 hours (primary care, oncology, and cardiology)
Non-clinical volunteering: ~1400 hours
Research: 1000 hours (see above, no papers, posters, or abstracts yet)
Extracurriculars (marathon running): ~1500 hours
Both PIs I’ve worked under have said they will give me great letters.
TLDR: I will be applying this cycle and have less than one year of research experience, but I can’t imagine a career without research now. Should I apply MD or MD/PhD?
I was a non-science major, completed a DIY post-bacc, and had no research experience on my last application. I only started volunteering in a research lab this past October and several months ago was hired in an adjacent lab as a research assistant. I never anticipated that I would like research, but I can’t imagine a career without it now.
I have nothing concrete to show for my research, just possibly a school-wide poster before June. I’m working on getting more data for a paper that should be submitted in the late summer, but of course I’ll have submitted my application before then.
To get to the point, I’d like to know whether it would be worth applying MD/PhD or if I should just apply MD. It seems to me that I don’t have the research chops yet to apply MD/PhD, but I now foresee myself wanting to run a lab someday on the basic-translational side of research and would like to have the dedicated, sustained time for research that a PhD allows. I don’t want to wait another year to get more research experience because my MCAT will no longer be accepted at most schools at that point.
Here’s how my GPA/MCAT/experiences size up:
ORM
CA resident
GPA: 4.0
MCAT: 521
Clinical experience: ~600 hours
Shadowing experience: 60 hours (primary care, oncology, and cardiology)
Non-clinical volunteering: ~1400 hours
Research: 1000 hours (see above, no papers, posters, or abstracts yet)
Extracurriculars (marathon running): ~1500 hours
Both PIs I’ve worked under have said they will give me great letters.
TLDR: I will be applying this cycle and have less than one year of research experience, but I can’t imagine a career without research now. Should I apply MD or MD/PhD?