- Joined
- Oct 7, 2012
- Messages
- 780
- Reaction score
- 1,602
I've been at a few sites
A few away rotations in med school
3 different sites in residency
5 different places I moonlit during residency
Now as an attending in an SDG that has quite a few sites
I've collected enough data to form a strong correlation, was wondering if anyone else has noticed this or can comment since this seems to be spot-on in my experience so far.
Lots of people talk about how easy admissions are, how admin listens, shift coverage hours, etc, lots of nebulous things. If you tour a place on an interview you won't really know what it's like till you work there anyway.
But one thing seems consistent among all my sites, and if I rank them by how much I liked them, it coincidentally correlates to one thing:
Chairs.
A really cush gig has a really cush seat.
The worst staffed places, the worst admin, or the worst anything always seems to have the worst chair. The CMG I still work at PRN has terrible chairs and is difficult overall to work at (not because of the chair, mind you, but I'm just seeing a correlation).
My SDG is amazing. And we just got brand new chairs, though the old ones weren't bad either.
I'm just kind of wondering if applicants, to any degree of sensitivity, can look at a chair during their walkthrough and gauge if they're going to like working there.
Or maybe I'm just crazy. Thoughts?
EDIT: reading over this, I just want to emphasize that I am being literal when I say "chair", I don't mean the head of the department, I mean where your ass sits.
A few away rotations in med school
3 different sites in residency
5 different places I moonlit during residency
Now as an attending in an SDG that has quite a few sites
I've collected enough data to form a strong correlation, was wondering if anyone else has noticed this or can comment since this seems to be spot-on in my experience so far.
Lots of people talk about how easy admissions are, how admin listens, shift coverage hours, etc, lots of nebulous things. If you tour a place on an interview you won't really know what it's like till you work there anyway.
But one thing seems consistent among all my sites, and if I rank them by how much I liked them, it coincidentally correlates to one thing:
Chairs.
A really cush gig has a really cush seat.
The worst staffed places, the worst admin, or the worst anything always seems to have the worst chair. The CMG I still work at PRN has terrible chairs and is difficult overall to work at (not because of the chair, mind you, but I'm just seeing a correlation).
My SDG is amazing. And we just got brand new chairs, though the old ones weren't bad either.
I'm just kind of wondering if applicants, to any degree of sensitivity, can look at a chair during their walkthrough and gauge if they're going to like working there.
Or maybe I'm just crazy. Thoughts?
EDIT: reading over this, I just want to emphasize that I am being literal when I say "chair", I don't mean the head of the department, I mean where your ass sits.