I was told that they had two or three IMG's whom had some problems passing Step 3 (English wasn't their first language), and left the program. I may be mistaken, but I don't think they've had any IMG's in the past couple of years.
Yes, the program had some problems as of a few years ago. In response to this, they imported Noel Weidner from UCSF to be the director of surg path. He has made some changes to the program, including the addition of a surg path fellowship, a daily "the most interesting cases of the day" conference, and of course exposure to his extensive consult service. Supposedly, he's a bit of a football coach--he has no problem yelling at residents who are unprepared. However, once you rectify the problem, he does not bear grudges and is happy to work with you. He is an amazing surgical pathologist, and just completed a new surgical path bible, "Modern Surgical Pathology", which will be a competitor with Sternberg and Ackerman. If you work hard, he can teach you alot.
Resident morale is extremely high--everyone loves the program and will talk your ear off to that effect. This is the thing that attracted me the most to the program. One objective index that I recorded during my interviews was the number of residents that came to lunch--UCSD was the highest of the programs that I interviewed at, with about 8 very enthusiastic residents present at lunch. Also, I like san diego, but that's another story.
Anyway, enough UCSD boosterism. I'm not even ranking it first. I knew i shouldn't have posted my first comment in this thread. These kind of arguments are somewhat pointless. Choosing "The Best" program is a very personal decision, and everyone's list will be different, for a million different reasons. Not that I didn't vote in the above poll.
cheers and good luck to everyone. less than a week left.
-mrp