What do you think of lowering the definition of hypertension?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

futureapppsy2

Assistant professor
Volunteer Staff
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2008
Messages
7,554
Reaction score
6,187
Did changing the cut-off from 140/90 to 130/80 in 2017 change your clinical decisions? Do you think it's justified by the evidence?

Members don't see this ad.
 

VA Hopeful Dr

Senior Member
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
Lifetime Donor
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2004
Messages
27,714
Reaction score
54,338
Did changing the cut-off from 140/90 to 130/80 in 2017 change your clinical decisions? Do you think it's justified by the evidence?
Nope. I'm not giving BP meds (or sticking them with a hypertension diagnosis for life) to someone whose BP is 131/81.

Technically it is evidenced based if you look at the BP v. mortality curve, but most HTN literature ignores how often shooting for perfect causes symptomatic hypotension.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

Ironheme

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
251
Reaction score
246
Did changing the cut-off from 140/90 to 130/80 in 2017 change your clinical decisions? Do you think it's justified by the evidence?
It changed it slightly. For my younger patients, I'm more strict about the BP (ACC guidelines) and explain to them why. For my older patients, I stick with JNC 8 because I've noticed what VA hopeful Dr mentioned - the symptomatic hypotension. I hate having to bring them back in for constant rechecks and readjusting. Also, they didn't include family docs in that discussion of <130/80 mmHg...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Top