- Joined
- Mar 14, 2008
- Messages
- 136
- Reaction score
- 1
I am getting the impression that there is great variation between different veterinary schools with regards to how anatomy is taught. I think it would be interesting to hear different perspectives from each of the schools, and perhaps pros/cons and how it could be improved.
I'm a first year student at the University of Florida, and this is what it was like, in general:
For this fall semester, we were required to have a copy of "Guide to the Dissection of the Dog" (by Evans de Lahunta), as well as an anatomy lab guide (84 pages) that included a section on performing a clinical examination as well as other clinical procedures. Another guide book (62-page clinical correlations guide) was filled with surgical procedures and ideal approaches that pertained to what we were learning. It included information on what structural landmarks to look out for and what nerves and vessels to avoid. We had three lectures pertaining to this, which then included 30 minutes with live dogs (about 6 people per dog) in order to palpate certain important structures and ask questions.
The course had five quizzes, two exams, and a cumulative final exam. The quizzes were roughly divided up by thoracic limb, pelvic limb, thorax, abdomen, and head. The first exam included information regarding the first two quizzes plus a written portion, and the second exam included information regarding quizzes three and four plus its own written portion. The final exam, counting for 1/3 of our total grade, was cumulative but focused heavily on the canine head.
The course lasted 52 weekdays, and we (all 88 of us) were pretty much in lab every day from 1:15 to 4:00pm, though sometimes we would have radiology labs, clinical correlations, and other lectures taking up some of those afternoons. We had four students per canine cadaver and each student was given their own bone boxed set. We followed the lab guide in terms of what structures to find next, but what made the experience extremely positive was the availability of eleven instructional staff that really went out of their way to help us and keep us on track. Two were professors, two were DVMs, one was a facilitator, and six were senior veterinary students. They were always there for us and most of us got to know them really well.
The examinations were very fair (why feel the need to have nasty tricks?) and we were given 90 seconds per station (around 15-20 stations for quizzes and 34-38 stations for exams). The anatomy room was well ventilated, very roomy, and we did not have to share stations (no "A" or "B" group or other classes using our room).
We will be performing equine dissections next semester (eight people per group, four on each side) and believe it will last about 4-6 weeks. As fas as I know we will not be dissecting any other animals.
I really really really enjoyed this class and learned a ton! The instructional staff was amazing and the clinical applications for the structures we had to identify were often emphasized. As far as improving the course, I think that at least including feline anatomy sometime would be important. I find that we had plenty of time to prepare for each quiz and examination as we were in lab every single day. Seldom did I stay late or come back to study at night. Probably the most challenging aspect of the course was memorizing all of the origins, insertions, blood supply, innervation, and action of each of the muscles, even though there was not a heavy emphasis on the origins or insertions.
So, how was your first semester of anatomy???
I'm a first year student at the University of Florida, and this is what it was like, in general:
For this fall semester, we were required to have a copy of "Guide to the Dissection of the Dog" (by Evans de Lahunta), as well as an anatomy lab guide (84 pages) that included a section on performing a clinical examination as well as other clinical procedures. Another guide book (62-page clinical correlations guide) was filled with surgical procedures and ideal approaches that pertained to what we were learning. It included information on what structural landmarks to look out for and what nerves and vessels to avoid. We had three lectures pertaining to this, which then included 30 minutes with live dogs (about 6 people per dog) in order to palpate certain important structures and ask questions.
The course had five quizzes, two exams, and a cumulative final exam. The quizzes were roughly divided up by thoracic limb, pelvic limb, thorax, abdomen, and head. The first exam included information regarding the first two quizzes plus a written portion, and the second exam included information regarding quizzes three and four plus its own written portion. The final exam, counting for 1/3 of our total grade, was cumulative but focused heavily on the canine head.
The course lasted 52 weekdays, and we (all 88 of us) were pretty much in lab every day from 1:15 to 4:00pm, though sometimes we would have radiology labs, clinical correlations, and other lectures taking up some of those afternoons. We had four students per canine cadaver and each student was given their own bone boxed set. We followed the lab guide in terms of what structures to find next, but what made the experience extremely positive was the availability of eleven instructional staff that really went out of their way to help us and keep us on track. Two were professors, two were DVMs, one was a facilitator, and six were senior veterinary students. They were always there for us and most of us got to know them really well.
The examinations were very fair (why feel the need to have nasty tricks?) and we were given 90 seconds per station (around 15-20 stations for quizzes and 34-38 stations for exams). The anatomy room was well ventilated, very roomy, and we did not have to share stations (no "A" or "B" group or other classes using our room).
We will be performing equine dissections next semester (eight people per group, four on each side) and believe it will last about 4-6 weeks. As fas as I know we will not be dissecting any other animals.
I really really really enjoyed this class and learned a ton! The instructional staff was amazing and the clinical applications for the structures we had to identify were often emphasized. As far as improving the course, I think that at least including feline anatomy sometime would be important. I find that we had plenty of time to prepare for each quiz and examination as we were in lab every single day. Seldom did I stay late or come back to study at night. Probably the most challenging aspect of the course was memorizing all of the origins, insertions, blood supply, innervation, and action of each of the muscles, even though there was not a heavy emphasis on the origins or insertions.
So, how was your first semester of anatomy???
Last edited: