- Joined
- Apr 4, 2017
- Messages
- 22
- Reaction score
- 6
I know everyone is different but this is just to get an idea.
Depends.
Anecdotally, seems like average applicants get 1 interview per 3-5 secondaries completed, more if you're an attractive candidate.
Even 1 in 3 is probably way too much. That’s 10 interviews for 30 apps which is a fairly strong showing.
If I were to take a guess, I would estimate:
1 acceptance per 4 interviews attended
Average number of acceptances for a successful applicant is 1
So most successful apps probably get between 3-7 interviews in one season.
Many have silence the entire cycle.
I’ve also seen people interview everywhere they applied.
Lol i forgot u did this
Is this MSQ survey data so it just represents matriculant data as does the MSAR. I dont know of a source that might give applicant, interview, acceptance data.
Just another fun fact is that at any individual school, 80%+ of applicants must be rejected prior to II simply based on available interview slots. Purely based on this, more that 1 interview per 5 schools would be better than chance. But then of course 58.8% of statistics are horse hockey
For reference...I was a very middle of the road candidate by SDN standards.
11 Secondaries —> 6 Interviews —> ~55%
No II to reach schools though.
...but true.This is silly
I interpreted that comment as saying that a small amount of applicants get a lot of interviews, and that most applicants get few to zero interviews. Not actual URMs or ORMs...This is silly. I think we are all old enough to know how affirmative action works. They keep in mind that they need diversity in order to meet certain quotas. That doesn’t mean they are just interviewing every minority that applies. I know plenty of URM with decent stats who didn’t get a single interview.
Interview is based on FIT, stats and EC/letters. To think that race alone would give a person such an inherent boost is simply finding a convenient outlet for your own insecurities and frustrations.
Lol. And PS I am not an URM.
I interpreted that comment as saying that a small amount of applicants get a lot of interviews, and that most applicants get few to zero interviews. Not actual URMs or ORMs...
Ahhhhhh CARS. The most underappreciated MCAT subsection.I interpreted that comment as saying that a small amount of applicants get a lot of interviews, and that most applicants get few to zero interviews. Not actual URMs or ORMs...
I interpreted that comment as saying that a small amount of applicants get a lot of interviews, and that most applicants get few to zero interviews. Not actual URMs or ORMs...
Gyngyn was using minority/majority in the original mathematical sense of the words. Simply put, a relatively small pool of applicants get a ton of interviews and the remainder get none or few. This same point has been made by others on this forum.
I was a weak applicant and interviewed at 5 schools, but my school list favored smart choices (in-state, lots of DO).
A statistic in this would be worthless because everyone chooses school lists differently. I have multiple classmates who only applied to our school.
Some serious cajones there
Location is everythingSome serious cajones there