D
deleted1081396
- What was their income?
- What was their subspecialty?
- What city/state/region of the country did they live in?
- What was their setting, work week and lifestyle like?
Neuroimmunology fellowship?On the website Medicare unmasked, I remember seeing an MS neurologist having the highest Medicare collections of any physician in the county. 15M if I remember correctly.
Fraud.Neuroimmunology fellowship?
Agreed. I'm wondering what is with all of these income questions lately. Especially, like you said, there are already plenty of recent ones with up-to-date information, and the same consensus answer.We have plenty of these threads out there already.
1. Info regarding specific subspecialties and locations isn't as widespread.Agreed. I'm wondering what is with all of these income questions lately. Especially, like you said, there are already plenty of recent ones with up-to-date information, and the same consensus answer.
1. Info regarding specific subspecialties and locations isn't as widespread.
2. The secrets about the positives of neuro, such as potential salary, are starting to get out among med stufents such as myself.
We're more aware of the potential for good salary and lifestyle if you want that. We're more attuned to the fact that neuro will probably be more resistant to mid-level encroachment than other non-surgical fields. Among other positives.Is this a joke? Please tell me it is, because every Neurologist I know is looking to escape the indignities of clinical Neurology as soon as possible. If this is not being communicated to current medical students, then we are failing you. I saw 4 functional quadriplegia patients my last shift. That is 4X the number of patients that I gave tPA to during that shift.
That's a pretty crazy number. Idk how the economics of it work. If you just replace his patient panel with insurance patients, surely his numbers go up way more? And that's assuming 100 percent of his business is medicare.On the website Medicare unmasked, I remember seeing an MS neurologist having the highest Medicare collections of any physician in the county. 15M if I remember correctly.
Agreed. I'm wondering what is with all of these income questions lately. Especially, like you said, there are already plenty of recent ones with up-to-date information, and the same consensus answer.
With the rate of residency growth that may be inevitableSecrets? Oh god.
Please don't make us the next EM.
Billings do not equal net pay. There could be all sorts of moving parts, such as PAs billing under their name or procedures that largely go to an organization rather than the individual, plus many expensive bills are such due to high overheadThat's a pretty crazy number. Idk how the economics of it work. If you just replace his patient panel with insurance patients, surely his numbers go up way more? And that's assuming 100 percent of his business is medicare.
Is that really true?Is this a joke? Please tell me it is, because every Neurologist I know is looking to escape the indignities of clinical Neurology as soon as possible. If this is not being communicated to current medical students, then we are failing you.
With the rate of residency growth that may be inevitable
Is that really true?
I think this is wildly overstated. I'm a movement subspecialist, and only epilepsy has a worse reputation for psychogenic patients. I would estimate that less than 1 out of every 20 to 30 of my new patient visits are ones where I have cause to even seriously consider whether they are functional or not. It is far more common that I receive patients that other physicians have labelled as functional only to find that they have a pretty obvious organic disorder (dystonia being the most common here).I hope not. However I can attest to the burnout from functional/psychogenic patients. Depending on the subspecialty, one can expect that up to 1/4 of patients they see have non-organic etiologies.
It isn't the ratio of psychogenic. Hospital neurology tends to get the worst offenders in terms of functional weakness, and they are very irritating because it can be time consuming and expensive to prove it is functional, and the rare patient contains malpractice risk if they are too quickly dismissed. Epilepsy definitely has the highest % psychogenic up to 20-30%, but the diagnosis is straightforward and very exact compared to the functional weakness patients.I think this is wildly overstated. I'm a movement subspecialist, and only epilepsy has a worse reputation for psychogenic patients. I would estimate that less than 1 out of every 20 to 30 of my new patient visits are ones where I have cause to even seriously consider whether they are functional or not. It is far more common that I receive patients that other physicians have labelled as functional only to find that they have a pretty obvious organic disorder (dystonia being the most common here).
I'm hopeful for both of our fields in the near future. For those of us finishing soon, we'll at least have some experience that will give us an edge and some seniority, but the more distant future... It worries meYup.
Neurology, psychiatry and dermatology have expanded their residency spots very rapidly over the last decade. This in conjunction with the midlevels creep.
Luckily for psychiatry, the shortage of providers is so severe, the critical mass probably won’t be achieved for another 20 years.
For neurology, the field itself has grown significantly. We’re now able to diagnose and treat a lot more conditions than we did 20 years ago. Therefore I’m hopeful this would help absorb the increases influx of providers, at least for the life of my career.
Dermatology is probably less resistant to the upcoming challenges than the other two fields. Another problem they have, that we don’t, is PE.
Really wish you could delete SDN threads so ones like this one don't clog up the feed...
No one's really answered the question. Really wish you could delete SDN threads so ones like this one don't clog up the feed... I guess the only way to get good info is to actually get out there and network.