What specialties are intellectually the easiest?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Fried Plantaris

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2016
Messages
106
Reaction score
174
In terms of least content to have to know and most straightforward in scope of practice?

For instance I don't think internal medicine or radiology/pathology would be very easy due to the sheer amount of knowledge you'd have to possess (but I could be wrong)

Members don't see this ad.
 
Not giving a specific answer but in general would say actually the more subspecialized you are the less intellectually challenging. In my field, for example, you can be a kidney stone specialist. You need obviously a great depth of knowledge on the subject, but when focused on such a narrow aspect of medicine, that is quite easy compared to an internist trying to stay current on almost anything. Of course you also have to know your base field (urology in that case) well enough to pass your boards and take call.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Psychiatry (much more straightforward than internal medicine)- It's a lot easier to be a mediocre psychiatrist than a mediocre internist
5/10 intellectual toughness, 10/10 social issues toughness
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
My thoughts would be extremely specialized surgeons (like a hepatobiliary surgeon, for example) and fellowship fields like reproductive endocrinology and pain management. Granted, for reproductive endo you have to go through an ob/gyn residency first, but I think it sounds like a straightforward job once you get out of fellowship.

But really, the nice thing about medicine is you can do just about whatever you want with it. Shadowed a family med doc once who got HIV certified and basically ran a nearly HIV-only practice. His scope was pretty narrow, too, thought he could technically treat regular family med patients if he wanted to.
 
In terms of least content to have to know and most straightforward in scope of practice?
These aren't necessarily related, e.g. I know an endocrine surgeon whose caseload is 95%+ thyroid/parathyroidectomies. Pretty straightforward mostly, but hard to argue they don't have to know a lot. Orthopedics is similar.

The physicians I have met who seemed to have both the least content to know and most straightforward scope of practice have all been academic EM by a mile (every patient gets a consult or two, then just follow consultant recs) though wouldn't say that the norm for the field.

I always thought outpatient community general pediatrics seemed fairly straightforward.
 
Not to knock them, but being a wound care specialist doesn't seem to take a lot of intellectual thought. You don't even have to complete a residency to do that, just 3 years of "clinical experience" with wound care last I checked.

If they don't like the looks of things, then the patient goes to a surgeon while the primary doc does the actual fine tuning for medical management. At least that's been my experience with them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Functional medicine.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4 users
My thoughts would be extremely specialized surgeons (like a hepatobiliary surgeon, for example) and fellowship fields like reproductive endocrinology and pain management. Granted, for reproductive endo you have to go through an ob/gyn residency first, but I think it sounds like a straightforward job once you get out of fellowship.

But really, the nice thing about medicine is you can do just about whatever you want with it. Shadowed a family med doc once who got HIV certified and basically ran a nearly HIV-only practice. His scope was pretty narrow, too, thought he could technically treat regular family med patients if he wanted to.
HPB surgeon. Going to have to give a hard shutdown to this. The complexity of fixing someone else's problems from general surgery, and/or transplant, and/or how nebulous benign HPB stuff can be sucks. For the malignant side, the spectrum of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies offered by med onc, rad onc, and IR and knowing when to use them over your knife or use them in conjunction is getting worse every day. I also haven't really been to a multi-D clinic yet where the other cancer doctors didn't end at least 7/10 cases with "but I defer to the judgement of the surgeon".

My opinion is colored quite a bit in that I'm surg/onc HPB which ratchets up the number of organs and disease sites I have to treat by... an alot. But even in the HPB space I feel incredibly challenged for the moderate complexity cases. I wouldn't attempt the severely complex cases and don't envy the liver surgeons that get my referrals.

There are a lot of general surgery branches though that aren't HPB that I think would qualify. Breast is complicated AF but its such a limited scope that if you're only doing breast that is pretty cool and manageable. Same with thyroid/parathyroid. Its super challenging anatomy and easy to hurt someone but once you get it you're a wizard and it takes very little to maintain your 'up to dateness', I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
always odd to me that people **** on ortho when psychiatry is rejecting admissions for a glucose of 135 or sodium 134. Psych are way way bigger offenders of "i dont know anything, just admit to IM".
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Members don't see this ad :)
Psychiatry (much more straightforward than internal medicine)- It's a lot easier to be a mediocre psychiatrist than a mediocre internist
It’s also a lot easier to practice crappy psychiatry and get away with it, just because the evidence base is much more open to interpretation in a lot of areas, around both diagnosis and treatment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
always odd to me that people **** on ortho when psychiatry is rejecting admissions for a glucose of 135 or sodium 134. Psych are way way bigger offenders of "i dont know anything, just admit to IM".
Agree. Psych and Neurology were big offenders where I did my residency. It was extremely frustrating.
 
OMM because no one can prove you’re doing it wrong.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 14 users
thoughts on FM?
FM is actually tough in terms of the breath of knowledge you have to know (You have to know everything including kids and obgyn- how does that sound), but its exhausting after a day of clinic, you deal with everything including social issues and medical issues. The lifestyle is good, as you have good work life balance. The great thing about FM is that you always have specialist you can punt the toughest problems to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Gonna go with occupational medicine, although I haven't the faintest idea of what they do
 
Adult Cardiology, once you've gotten through the IM residency part...it's basically just plumbing at that point. And compared to pediatric cardiology, the pipes are in the normal configuration 99% of the time. Ultimately, the final endpoint is maintaining cardiac output, which is really only modulated by 4 things - preload/contractility/afterload and HR, so it's not like there are a whole lot of knobs to twiddle with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
My thoughts would be extremely specialized surgeons (like a hepatobiliary surgeon, for example) and fellowship fields like reproductive endocrinology and pain management. Granted, for reproductive endo you have to go through an ob/gyn residency first, but I think it sounds like a straightforward job once you get out of fellowship.

But really, the nice thing about medicine is you can do just about whatever you want with it. Shadowed a family med doc once who got HIV certified and basically ran a nearly HIV-only practice. His scope was pretty narrow, too, thought he could technically treat regular family med patients if he wanted to.
A good REI has to have pretty good grasps on physiology and actually often has to think through a lot of stuff related to the patients fertility. It isn’t all just technical work doing IVF.

But there are plenty of fields with limited stuff you can actually do. For example, pulmonologist only have a half dozen drugs they use on a day to day basis. But there’s still a lot to consider to make sure you’re using them right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
emergency medicine because you're only having to actually use your brain 10 days of the month

Wow EM works 20 days a month where you are?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 13 users
Psychiatry is far from easy, and the psychiatrists that think it’s easy, I would wager it’s not because they’re good psychiatrists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Not giving a specific answer but in general would say actually the more subspecialized you are the less intellectually challenging. In my field, for example, you can be a kidney stone specialist. You need obviously a great depth of knowledge on the subject, but when focused on such a narrow aspect of medicine, that is quite easy compared to an internist trying to stay current on almost anything. Of course you also have to know your base field (urology in that case) well enough to pass your boards and take call.
But being a stone guy is a privilige very few have, to sustain yourself u need to do general uro on the side , general urology by itsself is extremely specialized
 
Psychiatry (much more straightforward than internal medicine)- It's a lot easier to be a mediocre psychiatrist than a mediocre internist

I am not entirely sure this is true. Even if it is, I’m not sure why your benchmark for this question would be how difficult it is to practice a given specialty poorly. That probably has far more to do with other factors than the inherent difficulty.

It’s also a lot easier to practice crappy psychiatry and get away with it, just because the evidence base is much more open to interpretation in a lot of areas, around both diagnosis and treatment.

It is indeed very possible to be a terrible psychiatrist, but I don’t think this is the reason. It probably has more to do with the fact that the severely mentally ill are highly vulnerable. These patients often have functional, cognitive or financial limitations that make it difficult to consult with an attorney and bring a substantive malpractice suit.

Agree. Psych and Neurology were big offenders where I did my residency. It was extremely frustrating.

always odd to me that people **** on ortho when psychiatry is rejecting admissions for a glucose of 135 or sodium 134. Psych are way way bigger offenders of "i dont know anything, just admit to IM".
This is also a dumb benchmark. The medical complexity a psychiatric unit is willing to accept is highly variable and institution (or unit) dependent.

Where I trained, plenty of patients on our units were getting IV medications including antibiotics, had various drains, had multiple chronic conditions, etc. We would insert NG tubes, remove sutures, etc. Most of our eating disorder patients were in active refeeding syndrome. This is not the case everywhere but it has very little to do with the doctors. Some psych units are part of free-standing psychiatric hospitals with minimal or no in-house med/surg services. Obviously the ceiling of acceptable medical complexity for these units is going to be low.

Even on a psychiatric unit that is part of a med/surg hospital, many things can get in the way of us taking patients. To begin with, there may be institutional policies that could prevent us from taking certain patients. Beyond that, depending on the unit/institution, the psych nurses may not be experienced in certain types of care. Examples of this might be wound care, managing pumps or administration of certain types of medications, or maintenance of certain types of medical equipment. Even if the nurses are comfortable, the staffing and resources are usually different on a psych floor than a med-surg floor. It might not be a problem for a medical floor nurse to draw q6 labs, but this creates staffing problems on a psych floor when there are limited nurses and several of them might be unavailable for patient care because they’re acting as 1:1s for patients at high risk of suicide or violence. At some places, phlebotomy may be less predictable than at other places in the hospital because there may only be a couple of phlebotomists for all of the psych floors. This can be a problem if your patient really requires morning labs that will result that morning.

The physician staffing after-hours can also be different. Where I trained, one psychiatry house officer would be responsible for up to 80 beds, including any admissions to the units. And even so, as I said, we probably accepted some of the most medically complex patients of anywhere in the country. But you can imagine what it’s like being responsible for that many patients on call, all while trying to admit and respond to behavioral codes. A couple of patients going into hypertensive urgency or DKA or whatever really messes up our ability to do our job, including by admitting patients from the ED and clearing room for medical patients.

Furthermore, whether a patient is appropriate for psychiatry often has to do with their motivation and history during prior inpatient admissions. If someone with a severe mood disorder had a serious suicide attempt, in most situations, most psychiatrists will agree that person will need an admission once medically stable, or at least ongoing psychiatric consultation to recommend treatment during their medical hospitalization. But not every case is as clear cut. Someone is an alcoholic and often tries to kill themselves when they’re drunk, but has no suicidal intent when sober and does not want to engage in substance abuse treatment? That person might be unlikely to benefit from an inpatient psychiatric admission and the fact that they’re homeless and your social worker is having difficulty finding a place for them to go does not modify their appropriateness for a psych admission. We see this stuff all the time and it often comes out of a fundamental misunderstanding of what we do and what the role for a psychiatric admission is. It is not psychiatry’s job to assume custodial care of homeless or chronically mentally ill people and try to manage their social barriers to discharge. That is a social work problem. The job of inpatient psychiatry is to treat people with an acute presentation of psychiatric illness for whom treatment is likely to result in transition to a lower level of care.

There is also the milieu to consider. It might be fine to place a patient in a room on a medical floor, but if you take that same patient and put them on a psychiatric floor it might pose an unacceptable level of risk. Some frail elderly woman who is a fall risk may not be appropriate for a unit with several severely psychotic individuals that is having regular seclusion events.

I’ll also just add that everybody has a degree of discomfort with stuff they don’t handle regularly. We get more than our share of consults along the lines of “placing psych consult because patient has a history of schizophrenia” or similarly ridiculous requests. I could list them all and drag every other specialty through the mud but, ultimately, everybody is just trying to do their best for patients and I’m generally happy to help if I can figure out what it is that people actually need help with.

Suffice it to say: even if psych does not admit your patient, it’s likely that they’ve put a lot of thought into why they are or are not appropriate for admission. Maybe you should ask them to explain it next time and actually listen to what they’re saying. It’s unlikely that the psychiatrists are just refusing to take patients they could otherwise help without a good reason.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Everything will be “easy” once you’re experienced and everything is “hard” when you’re learning. Things that you “get” will be easier than things that come more difficult to you. Pelvic anatomy is difficult to learn for some
People but came naturally to me and I never understood cardiac physiology or the space where ENTs work; yet some people don’t find those areas that mentally taxing. Urogyn is about as straightforward as it gets for the most part: you either leak or you don’t or stuff is falling out of you or it isn’t and you have to use some brain cells . Most of the time I am on autopilot but everyone once in a while (once or twice week I get a few head scratchers)

just pick something that you comes naturally to you and if nothing does try to get into urogyn 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Top