- Joined
- Aug 9, 2009
- Messages
- 13,246
- Reaction score
- 201
An interesting interview question: If you could time travel and stay the same age you are right now, what time period in history would you want to visit/live in and why?
Nothing in the past, unless I had antibiotics and a lot of money.
How about 500 years in the future... now we're talking.
Fair enough- so what do you think 500 years in the future will look like?
No idea... Considering people 60 years ago figured we'd be in hover cars and force fields by now. For all I know we'd end up in the stone age again.
if that came up in an interview I'd ask them to ask another question.
That's easy... Renaissance Europe. I've always been fascinated with the Middle Ages but I'd stick with the Renaissance just to avoid most of the plague, famine, etc etc. The few times I've visited Europe it's just always intrigued me so much that I would risk infection, disease, etc to go back in time. LOL
BUT... if that's too extreme I would go back and live in the 1980's for sure. I'd go right now. LOL
That's easy... Renaissance Europe. I've always been fascinated with the Middle Ages but I'd stick with the Renaissance just to avoid most of the plague, famine, etc etc. The few times I've visited Europe it's just always intrigued me so much that I would risk infection, disease, etc to go back in time. LOL
BUT... if that's too extreme I would go back and live in the 1980's for sure. I'd go right now. LOL
They thought it was unholy to bathe in the Middle Ages so I would skip that era, too. The Rennaisance would be exciting. I would want to live in the South pre-Civil War. And no, I wouldn't have a plantation. lol
whenever these pictures were taken.... 1950s?
young marlon brando was a cutie
the past for sure! assuming i get to keep my current knowledge. that way, i can totally wow everyone back then with my "gifted" insight into science and medicine in addition help advance the progress of pharmacy practice and overall public health.
at least that's what i'm guessing the interviewer WANTS to hear.
And then you get cholera and die. Or flu and die. Or TB and die.
Damn...
Too bad that's also happening in under-developed countries right now in 2010.
not gonna get into that. Not gonna talk about XDR-TB or anything like that. We're talking about you... as in you, that lives NOT in an under-developed country (at least for now, LOL) and wouldn't die from TB, cholera, flu, or anything else barring extreme circumstances.
Hey I just like when you go all "**** is hitting the fan" on people... haha
Since I missed the hearsay thread and everything
But yeah... I guess that made up for the lack of car accidents and other untimely ways to die back then...
1940s for sure. Men were real men, women were real women, tv was not common place, people actually took time to read the newspaper, meals were homemade, and the cars were stinkin' beautiful! Plus I think I'd enjoy wearing a Fedora everyday
1940s for sure. Men were real men, women were real women, tv was not common place, people actually took time to read the newspaper, meals were homemade, and the cars were stinkin' beautiful! Plus I think I'd enjoy wearing a Fedora everyday
Hey I just like when you go all "**** is hitting the fan" on people... haha
Since I missed the hearsay thread and everything
But yeah... I guess that made up for the lack of car accidents and other untimely ways to die back then...
LOL, that Renetto guy is a Grade A *****, I'm sure you'll get to see plenty of that if he sticks around.
LOLOLOLOL ... was going to say something, but nothing can match your stupidity.
1940s for sure. Men were real men, women were real women, tv was not common place, people actually took time to read the newspaper, meals were homemade, and the cars were stinkin' beautiful! Plus I think I'd enjoy wearing a Fedora everyday
I'm merely speaking of the masculinity of men and femininity of women. I believe I'm as progressive as the next kid in my generation, but I draw the line in terms of a lot of sociology concepts. I think most men today have lost touch with their masculinity (think emo kids ) and women with their femininity - harder to tangibly quantify, but all the same I think it is evident in the internal conflict of feeling the need to be independent and accomplished as a modern woman but at the same time trying to maintain intimate relationships with others. In my personal experience, I perceive a lot of women as seeming conflicted and alienated because of this. I doubt many will agree, but you asked for my opinion so there it is.What is a "real man" and "real woman"
Was your use of the word "dig" a joke or coincidental to the fact it was popular term during the time period?So a man goes to work and the woman is barefoot and pregnant all day tending the home and children?
Gag me.
However, I dig the fedora, I dig the lack of television, and I dig a more polite society.
HOWEVER, the 1940s were far from perfect. Far, far.
The culture man, the culture...but then again I'm biased for my love of the literature of the time period and wrenching on cars from the era.Eugenics was also a fad back then ... FDR was a believer in it.
Along with spending the previous decade in severe depression....
Terrible time period.
I wouldn't want to go to the future because what if we go too far and it isn't even there? What if we just explode... or what if there are new diseases we can't even plan for. Or what if it just stinks... like we're back in the stone age writing on cave walls and there is nothing fun to see? Or what if we've been taken over by aliens and we're all slaves so we just spend the whole trip trying to hide our human form? I'd take my chances with influenza and diarrhea.
lol
I'm merely speaking of the masculinity of men and femininity of women. I believe I'm as progressive as the next kid in my generation, but I draw the line in terms of a lot of sociology concepts. I think most men today have lost touch with their masculinity (think emo kids ) and women with their femininity - harder to tangibly quantify, but all the same I think it is evident in the internal conflict of feeling the need to be independent and accomplished as a modern woman but at the same time trying to maintain intimate relationships with others. In my personal experience, I perceive a lot of women as seeming conflicted and alienated because of this. I doubt many will agree, but you asked for my opinion so there it is.
Was your use of the word "dig" a joke or coincidental to the fact it was popular term during the time period?
Your interpretation of my statement is incorrect. I have no desire for an at home wife or kids for that matter.
The culture man, the culture...but then again I'm biased for my love of the literature of the time period and wrenching on cars from the era.
What if Jesus has returned and told us we are all going to hell?
I'm merely speaking of the masculinity of men and femininity of women. I believe I'm as progressive as the next kid in my generation, but I draw the line in terms of a lot of sociology concepts. I think most men today have lost touch with their masculinity (think emo kids ) and women with their femininity - harder to tangibly quantify, but all the same I think it is evident in the internal conflict of feeling the need to be independent and accomplished as a modern woman but at the same time trying to maintain intimate relationships with others. In my personal experience, I perceive a lot of women as seeming conflicted and alienated because of this. I doubt many will agree, but you asked for my opinion so there it is.
1940s for sure. Men were real men, women were real women, tv was not common place, people actually took time to read the newspaper, meals were homemade, and the cars were stinkin' beautiful! Plus I think I'd enjoy wearing a Fedora everyday
I would love to visit the 1960s - so much social change was occurring.
And I love the aesthetic of that time. Mad Men makes me drool every time I watch.
Renetto, the way you conduct yourself on these forums is an indication of your maturity level, which is not accurate of your age, unless you're a child genius.King of the castle, king of the castle, oooo chair I have chair.
Respect must be earned when it comes to pharmacy and if you're anything in person like you are online, you will be ready for a world of hurt.
Renetto, the way you conduct yourself on these forums is an indication of your maturity level, which is not accurate of your age, unless you're a child genius.
There's a reason we exist in this era. That's all I'll say.
For a P3, you're an arrogant prick. You'll never survive retail with that attitude, much less any specialization you pick, except something where you're all alone for 8+ hours a day.This subsection has never been one to be taken seriously anyway, just look at the people who have trolled it on a daily basis since its inception. I've provided relevant information to the people who ask for it and I play the game that other people want to bait me into playing. But of course you have to take everything out of context without seeing the big picture. I don't want to be a product of my environment, I want my environment to be a product of me.
By the way, this is a message board on the internet. Nothing more, nothing less.
EDIT: And even then, who are you to question my maturity? Have you accomplished the things I have? Are you at the same stage of pharmacy school that I am? I made it this far for a reason, think hard about that one.
For a P3, you're an arrogant prick. You'll never survive retail with that attitude, much less any specialization you pick, except something where you're all alone for 8+ hours a day.
Good night.
Back to around 800-1000 AD Arabia. The knowledge of drugs I have as a P2, is enough to mind**** them.
This is easy, I'd go back to biblical times and scratch my name on a wall or pot somewhere and by the time I was born I'd be the new messiah. Either that or I'd go screw up something that was really big in history, ex. writing of the bible, quran, declaration of independence
Man, haven't you ever seen Lost? I'd be in my present in either the future or the past and when I go back to the future/present I will still be in my present and therefore exist. Lost ftw!If you do one of those, there is a chance that you are not existed in the present time lol
Psssh. NOOB. Can be summed up by three word episode title, "Whatever happened, happened" Season 5 Episode 11Man, haven't you ever seen Lost? I'd be in my present in either the future or the past and when I go back to the future/present I will still be in my present and therefore exist. Lost ftw!
Bump. Anyone else?