- Joined
- Nov 10, 2010
- Messages
- 802
- Reaction score
- 161
I'm sure this is the perfect time to address this issue, before the interview takes places to determine what I need to exactly look for in a program.
I'm quite confused in terms of determining the "quality".
While they are all UNOPPOSED, the programs I've gotten interviews vary considerable in the sense of procedural training, location, type of program (urban vs. rural), etc. etc.
Is it necessarily wise to train in a setting where you want to practice one day? (which sort of puts me in another hole because I don't know yet).
Also, when asked something like "what do you feel are challenges facing family medicine in the next 10 years"
Is a response like "Lack of compensation, lack of recognition as well as increased use of mid-level providers has started to eat away at the scope of a family practitioner. " Appropriate? I merely want to dodge a bullet and not attempt to take sides.
I'm quite confused in terms of determining the "quality".
While they are all UNOPPOSED, the programs I've gotten interviews vary considerable in the sense of procedural training, location, type of program (urban vs. rural), etc. etc.
Is it necessarily wise to train in a setting where you want to practice one day? (which sort of puts me in another hole because I don't know yet).
Also, when asked something like "what do you feel are challenges facing family medicine in the next 10 years"
Is a response like "Lack of compensation, lack of recognition as well as increased use of mid-level providers has started to eat away at the scope of a family practitioner. " Appropriate? I merely want to dodge a bullet and not attempt to take sides.
Last edited: