- Joined
- Feb 15, 2007
- Messages
- 194
- Reaction score
- 0
Hello Pre-Dents:
I have applied to UCLA and USC. I haven't heard from anyone, yet. I submitted AADSAS August 29 and took the DAT October 28 and my scores are as follows:
RC 15
QR 17
PAT 17
OC 24
GC 23
BIO 21
AA 20
TS 23
GPA: 4.0
I called USC to ask whether they recommend a retake on the DAT, the admossion counselor said my scores are consistent except for the RC section. He also said that RC is not the most critical section and it's up to me whether I want to retake to improve my RC score. At the end, he said that a retake is not absolutely necessary. He said when most applicants retake the DAT, they mainly concentrate on the sections they have scored low and forget about the other sections. Therefore, the scores may not necessarily be higher in a retake.
However, when I called UCLA, Noemi said that I should definitely retake because of my low RC score and she said RC is very important, since there is a lot of reading involved in DS.
Now, since schools take the most recent score, what would you guys do? Do you retake the DAT? (UCLA doesnt accept DATs taken after Dec. 31., 2007.)
Would u just hope to get an interview invite from USC or u retake and apply for the 2009 cycle and hope to be able to get into UCLA? (Since UCLA and USC are not even comparable; checking this forum, I do not read encouraging posts regarding USC.)
Any input will be greatly appreciated.
I have applied to UCLA and USC. I haven't heard from anyone, yet. I submitted AADSAS August 29 and took the DAT October 28 and my scores are as follows:
RC 15
QR 17
PAT 17
OC 24
GC 23
BIO 21
AA 20
TS 23
GPA: 4.0
I called USC to ask whether they recommend a retake on the DAT, the admossion counselor said my scores are consistent except for the RC section. He also said that RC is not the most critical section and it's up to me whether I want to retake to improve my RC score. At the end, he said that a retake is not absolutely necessary. He said when most applicants retake the DAT, they mainly concentrate on the sections they have scored low and forget about the other sections. Therefore, the scores may not necessarily be higher in a retake.
However, when I called UCLA, Noemi said that I should definitely retake because of my low RC score and she said RC is very important, since there is a lot of reading involved in DS.
Now, since schools take the most recent score, what would you guys do? Do you retake the DAT? (UCLA doesnt accept DATs taken after Dec. 31., 2007.)
Would u just hope to get an interview invite from USC or u retake and apply for the 2009 cycle and hope to be able to get into UCLA? (Since UCLA and USC are not even comparable; checking this forum, I do not read encouraging posts regarding USC.)
Any input will be greatly appreciated.