- Joined
- May 24, 2009
- Messages
- 4,672
- Reaction score
- 10,526
Disclaimer: This thread is in no way meant to disparage or make fun of any specialties, Derm included.
So I was discussing various medical specialties with two other classmates, and the topic of Dermatology came up. We're all M3s, although one of them really doesn't have his finger on the pulse of specialty competitiveness (he just assumed anything involving surgery was uber-competitive and anything involving non-surgery was pretty easy). He was very surprised to hear us talk about Derm as being perhaps the most competitive specialty there is. Which then led to his questioning "why?" The usual argument/assumption, I suppose, is it has a combination of good (but not amazing) pay/good hours/good lifestyle/relatively short residency. But is it really that much more amazing than many other specialties to warrant a mad dash for Derm each year during residency applications? I guess his stance was basically that Derm seems boring to him, and wonders why so many 250+ all-stars try to bend over backward each year to match.
Thoughts?
So I was discussing various medical specialties with two other classmates, and the topic of Dermatology came up. We're all M3s, although one of them really doesn't have his finger on the pulse of specialty competitiveness (he just assumed anything involving surgery was uber-competitive and anything involving non-surgery was pretty easy). He was very surprised to hear us talk about Derm as being perhaps the most competitive specialty there is. Which then led to his questioning "why?" The usual argument/assumption, I suppose, is it has a combination of good (but not amazing) pay/good hours/good lifestyle/relatively short residency. But is it really that much more amazing than many other specialties to warrant a mad dash for Derm each year during residency applications? I guess his stance was basically that Derm seems boring to him, and wonders why so many 250+ all-stars try to bend over backward each year to match.
Thoughts?