- Joined
- Oct 31, 2017
- Messages
- 140
- Reaction score
- 421
Last edited:
If you become a pop star as popular as Britney or an actor as popular as Keanu..I want 100M by 50. (Ambitious) is that stupid? Can I get that through proper real estate and stocks and alternative stuff?
Not stupid at all! It's totally hedonistic!I want 100M by 50. (Ambitious) is that stupid? Can I get that through proper real estate and stocks and alternative stuff?
I've run the numbers before. Saving 10k a month for 25 years at average 6.5% return will produce almost 7.5M. Add in home equity, etc and you could be close to that 10M figure.It's unrealistic. 10M is certainly doable if you've got 20 years and focus the entirety of your existence on it, but anything above that is just going to be dumb luck or incredible skill.
Can? yes Will? probably notI want 100M by 50. (Ambitious) is that stupid? Can I get that through proper real estate and stocks and alternative stuff?
Not stupid at all! It's totally hedonistic!
Just keep moving decimal points (I assume that's what you mean by alternative stuff)!
Edit: That should have read realistic!
You cannot get 100 million by 50 that is going to be impossible
Here is how you get there. Take a job with the VA. Live like a resident until 50+. That will leave about $100k to invest in the state lottery every year. You’ll come out with $100M or $0. Likely $0, but you’ve got a chance at $100M. If it fails over 20 years, you still have your VA pension.
No, because it doesn’t exist. And any such feelings derived solely from monetary assets would likely be fleeting at best for the vast majority of the population.... I just wonder if anyone is reaching for a certain number that makes them feel like content and completely secure....
You seem too nice to make $100 million that fast.I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic or not regarding hedonistic vs realistic lol
But is true, there’s no good reason to want or need that kind of money other than hedonistic desires (and the reality is, I don’t even know what I’d spend it on... I don’t like fancy vehicles/clothes. Though I do want a nice house), I suppose feeling total financial security is likely around 10M. (Not sarcasm, in case that’s not translating well).
No one answered my other questions though, what is a number you guys want to get to and how would you go about it? I’m not trying to fill this forum up with money talk, I love psychiatry and I love seeing patients, but I just wonder if anyone is reaching for a certain number that makes them feel like content and completely secure.
And here I thought I was being ambitious w/ 15M by the time I'm 60
Consider my ambition more as a result of ignorance surrounding how wealth is created and grows vs having an actual plan lol... though the idea of playing the lottery with a 100k a year doesn’t sound too bad at this point Hahahah
Can we delete this thread? I’m kind of embarrassed at my own naivety lol
Eh, 10 million would be tough in 20 was my numbers though, if we're talking absolute net worth, but is possible. That extra five years makes a big difference, particularly if you have student loans and other debt going in. In 25 years, 10 million is easily doable on a physician's salary, even without cutting a lot of corners, though if you account for inflation that 10 million won't be worth what it is today- inflation will make it worth about half that, and that's if we don't enter a period of hyperinflation.I've run the numbers before. Saving 10k a month for 25 years at average 6.5% return will produce almost 7.5M. Add in home equity, etc and you could be close to that 10M figure.
And 10k a month which would include maxing out 401K is very doable on a 400k year salary.
I technically almost have that already (I am 8 yrs post residency) but that includes value of property, and the paid off properties are my rental condo (that I bought to live in during med school) and rental house (that I bought to live in during residency) rather than my current house so I guess it doesn't actually count to most people. Currently projected to reach that number in my accounts in 8 years but I keep outpacing the target savings and moving up the date (and mint can't track one ser of accounts. And I don't even kill myself hours wise. Working spouse is very helpful, as is no children2.5 mil with a paid off house. Can live quite comfortably on that and maintain my current lifestyle.
Tell me howIt's unrealistic. 10M is certainly doable if you've got 20 years and focus the entirety of your existence on it, but anything above that is just going to be dumb luck or incredible skill.
Invest 15k per month at a 9% return for 20 years and you'll have $10.2 million. Doable by anyone if you work hard. In my state if you max out your 401k and put the rest of the just over 10k needed to save each month directly in the market in a S&P tracking ETF you'll have between 110-122k left to live on if your income is 400k pretax.Tell me how
It tends to average much higher or lower. You can use FIREcalc to figure out the chances based on every 30 year period in history if you likethe market doesn’t average 9 percent over 30 years
That's investing 180 g per year. If a psych makes 300k a year and pays taxes, how can they live if they invest 180k a year?Invest 15k per month at a 9% return for 20 years and you'll have $10.2 million. Doable by anyone if you work hard. In my state if you max out your 401k and put the rest of the just over 10k needed to save each month directly in the market in a S&P tracking ETF you'll have between 110-122k left to live on if your income is 400k pretax.
I was running the numbers at 400k, which is easily doable if you're working your ass off. Remember my first post- it is doable *if* you're willing to sacrifice a lot for it.That's investing 180 g per year. If a psych makes 300k a year and pays taxes, how can they live if they invest 180k a year?
I was running the numbers at 400k, which is easily doable if you're working your ass off. Remember my first post- it is doable *if* you're willing to sacrifice a lot for it.
Hey, I believe what you're saying but I am painting more of a worst case scenario. If you're in some big city, it may be harder to come by decent salary. But even with that you can pick up some weekends or whatever and pull 400kYou don't even need to work your ass off.
200/hr is pretty common rate for locums.hell even insurance pp is going to earn more than that. Do 40 hrs a week, do a weekend inpatient coverage a month and you're probably looking at closer to 500.
Any other side gigs ? In locums you pay more taxes as you are paying your own payroll taxes as a 1099You don't even need to work your ass off.
200/hr is pretty common rate for locums.hell even insurance pp is going to earn more than that. Do 40 hrs a week, do a weekend inpatient coverage a month and you're probably looking at closer to 500.
You can also put away more money pre-tax using a SEP IRA which allows for much faster savings. My calculations were actually based on SEP contributions, which allow 57k to be put away pre-tax.Any other side gigs ? In locums you pay more taxes as you are paying your own payroll taxes as a 1099
But you pay tax when taking it out. Is it 57 k ? I thought max was 16..You can also put away more money pre-tax using a SEP IRA which allows for much faster savings. My calculations were actually based on SEP contributions, which allow 57k to be put away pre-tax.
Self employment lets you do the employer and employee portion in a solo 401k or sepBut you pay tax when taking it out. Is it 57 k ? I thought max was 16..
SEP has a limit of 57k, 401/403 options are limited at 17k iircBut you pay tax when taking it out. Is it 57 k ? I thought max was 16..
401k for self employed is the employee contribution (same as for employed people) plus the employer portion based on profit and maxes out for a total of 57. For people who don't earn enough to max a sep a solo 401k is better.SEP has a limit of 57k, 401/403 options are limited at 17k iirc
You can also put away more money pre-tax using a SEP IRA which allows for much faster savings. My calculations were actually based on SEP contributions, which allow 57k to be put away pre-tax.
You mean like when I have a "business dinner" by myselfAren't there also a lot of creative accounting tricks when you're 1099 so you end up actually paying less tax?
YesAren't there also a lot of creative accounting tricks when you're 1099 so you end up actually paying less tax?
No one answered my other questions though, what is a number you guys want to get to and how would you go about it?
I want 100M by 50. (Ambitious) is that stupid? Can I get that through proper real estate and stocks and alternative stuff?
This is doable, but medicine will not be the primary pathway to get there. You will need at least one highly successful, scalable business.
$3M because I've read from multiple sources that's probably close to the new "million." I'm almost 2/3 the way there and have at least 20years left in my career and my goals are true financial independence but with the health and fitness to continue working at a pace and schedule comfortable for me, and the freedom to travel (post-virus) to see the world and sample its culinary offerings; going about it by working my butt off right now and saving 80% of m
4 million is enough. Enjoy life
So is becoming a doctor, yet here we all areIt's much more not doable than it is doable though.
4 million is enough. Enjoy life
So is becoming a doctor, yet here we all are
I'll bet you $100M that there are far more doctors than there are $100Maires.
Sounds like someone has fundamentally misunderstood the 4% rule (and also taxes apparently).Now I'm not sure that even that much is enough after reading this . What are you guys' thoughts?
While that's certainly true, I wonder how many made concerted efforts to attain that level wealth and missed it vs how many premeds try to become a doctor and fail somewhere along the way.
Been digging into various fire/retirement blogs and articles lately and I have to say I'm least satisfied with financialsamurai. Of all the FIRE folks, FS gives the most clickbaity article titles, is extremely long-winded (more page jumps), and often doesn't even totally tie together the point of her articles. All of the bloggers are incentivized to get clicks and I think FS is the most transparently serving that particular interest.Sounds like someone has fundamentally misunderstood the 4% rule (and also taxes apparently).
Been digging into various fire/retirement blogs and articles lately and I have to say I'm least satisfied with financialsamurai. Of all the FIRE folks, FS gives the most clickbaity article titles, is extremely long-winded (more page jumps), and often doesn't even totally tie together the point of her articles. All of the bloggers are incentivized to get clicks and I think FS is the most transparently serving that particular interest.
Safe withdrawal rate has to be understood in the context in which it developed: semi-conservative not-quite-complete-asset-depletion for normal-age retirees. If you withdraw an amount equal to 4% of the stating value of your retirement portfolio, there's very low chance you'll run out of money before whatever age you assumed you'd die. Sucks if you live longer than that because you may well run out of money at that point.
FIRE planners shouldn't use the "4% safe withdrawal rate," IMO. Especially if you're planning on retiring 10 years from now in your 40's. At that point, personally, if you're actually betting on having all of your income for the rest of your life last based on just your investment accounts, you should shoot for around 3% fixed or use one of the more nuanced withdrawal strategies (see this calculator: FI Calc very helpfully posted by @zpiff in another thread recently for a bunch of options.)
Which brings me to my approximate retirement number of about $4M current USD. I currently live extremely comfortably on about $60-75k post-tax annually. I'd like to eventually have a $120k post-tax standard of living, especially if/when I get married and have kids. 120k is 3% of 4M and pretty much never fails for any span of recorded investment history.
But I would probably go with a more nuanced withdrawal strategy of something like $90-100k minimum annual distribution and then some sort of performance-based variable withdrawal for extra disposable $$.