7
762513
I'm curious what this forum has to say. I'm mostly interesting in hearing well thought out viewpoints to support your vote. I have an open mind on this subject, please convince me.
Yep.As pointed out above, they are doctors. Most of the NPs I worked with in residency/fellowship were great and did not ever try to mislead patients (they introduced themselves as "RangerBob, nurse practitioner"). But they did earn their title. (I'm sure others will argue about how "easy" the degree is, and while I'm sure some DNP programs are easy, some aren't, and it's not like ours is the most difficult doctorate anyway)
People only think of physicians when the word "doctor" is used because for the most part, we are the only doctors the general population really interacted with throughout history. Your average farmer had no reason to speak with a doctor of theology, philosophy (the first doctorates), or whatever. Now there are many more doctorates and it's more common to run into a doctor of xxx.
Still, I agree it adds to confusion in a healthcare setting. But the truth is most patients think med students are doctors and residents are med students (and that most female physicians are nurses, especially at the VA), so even having large "Physician" ID tags and clearly introducing yourself really doesn't make that big a difference. I believe posting pictures with names at the bedside helps though--I think that should be standard in every hospital to be honest.
This is a really bad survey. Like written by someone who doesn't understand how nursing students think.
First of all the 'threat' of nurses that call themselves doctors is bullcrap. I have yet to meet a DNP bold enough to call themself a doctor in front of patient and physician. Sure I've read stories here about them, but I haven't talked to a single DNP or nursing practitioner student who thinks they're a doctor. I have instead talked to several who are intimidated, ashamed, or afraid of the term to the point of talking down about being called a doctor. Even if they were to be called doctor, they know in their minds they're just not: "IknowImnotadoctor". Cognitive dissonance kicks in. These nurses don't want to be known as 'doctor', but instead for everyone in the medical field to be "equal" and to instead be a "provider" of services. The number of nurses I've seen using this term FAR outnumber those who want to be called doctor.
Second, they are afraid of the cultural significance of the term, but none of these students think the term "doctor" means anything. That's that's the first challenge I offer them: tell me what a doctor--what a physician--is. None of them can tell me what function a physician performs. They believe that a nursing practitioner is interchangeable with a physician assistant which is interchangeable with a physician. Anyone can learn any of the clinical skills regardless of education. The intention of the term "provider" is to enshroud the origin of one's credentials to the point that a patient treats everyone the same. They would rather the term "doctor" leave medicine completely.
The chip on the shoulder of any given DNP student is large enough to alter the meaning of "doctor" and "nurse".
Yep.
PTs and Pharmacists are doctors now. But I've yet to meet one of either that introduces themselves as such.
Academically speaking, all of these people are doctors. With patients, none of them should be introducing themselves as Doctor.
Because they are new doctor level degrees.I agree with you on the pharmacists and PTs.
But in the interest of intellectual honesty and consistency, where do we draw the line? How do we draw the line? I don't have a problem introducing a clinical psychologist, who has a PhD, as "Dr. Psychologist." I don't have a problem addressing a dentist, who has a DMD or a DDS, as "Dr. Dentist," either. So I'm not really sure why I have a mental block against addressing a PT, who has a PhD, as "Dr. Physical Therapist" or a DNP as "Doctor Nurse Practitioner." Is it the whole "who has final responsibility for the patient" thing? Probably, but is that too arbitrary a line?
First of all the 'threat' of nurses that call themselves doctors is bullcrap. I have yet to meet a DNP bold enough to call themself a doctor in front of patient and physician. Sure I've read stories here about them, but I haven't talked to a single DNP or nursing practitioner student who thinks they're a doctor.
I agree with you on the pharmacists and PTs.
But in the interest of intellectual honesty and consistency, where do we draw the line? How do we draw the line? I don't have a problem introducing a clinical psychologist, who has a PhD, as "Dr. Psychologist." I don't have a problem addressing a dentist, who has a DMD or a DDS, as "Dr. Dentist," either. So I'm not really sure why I have a mental block against addressing a PT, who has a PhD, as "Dr. Physical Therapist" or a DNP as "Doctor Nurse Practitioner." Is it the whole "who has final responsibility for the patient" thing? Probably, but is that too arbitrary a line?
Be prepared for the wailing and gnashing of teeth from those who believe specific terms are meant only for God's True Anointed.I'm curious what this forum has to say. I'm mostly interesting in hearing well thought out viewpoints to support your vote. I have an open mind on this subject, please convince me.
This thread has actually been quite civil. Amazing what not being in Allo does for a discussionBe prepared for the wailing and gnashing of teeth from those who believe specific terms are meant only for God's True Anointed.
A professor of economics with a PhD is entitled to be called "doctor". But obviously, s/he is not a physician. Ahhh, Melchizedek beat me to it!
Currently the vote is 11 to 7 concerning whether someone who earned a doctorate is even a doctor. That meets my expectation from what SDN would say.Be prepared for the wailing and gnashing of teeth from those who believe specific terms are meant only for God's True Anointed.
A professor of economics with a PhD is entitled to be called "doctor". But obviously, s/he is not a physician. Ahhh, Melchizedek beat me to it!
Yes, the people who have posted have been very civil. I would like to hear the arguments from the people who don’t think DNP’s are doctors in any sense of the word or in any environment.This thread has actually been quite civil. Amazing what not being in Allo does for a discussion
This thread has actually been quite civil. Amazing what not being in Allo does for a discussion
No, you wouldn't. You've seen them in some of the more nasty threads you've been caught in before.Yes, the people who have posted have been very civil. I would like to hear the arguments from the people who don’t think DNP’s are doctors in any sense of the word or in any environment.
I agree with you on the pharmacists and PTs.
But in the interest of intellectual honesty and consistency, where do we draw the line? How do we draw the line? I don't have a problem introducing a clinical psychologist, who has a PhD, as "Dr. Psychologist." I don't have a problem addressing a dentist, who has a DMD or a DDS, as "Dr. Dentist," either. So I'm not really sure why I have a mental block against addressing a PT, who has a PhD, as "Dr. Physical Therapist" or a DNP as "Doctor Nurse Practitioner." Is it the whole "who has final responsibility for the patient" thing? Probably, but is that too arbitrary a line?
My high school sub had a PhD. So we called her "Dr."
My micro professor also had a PhD. So we called him "Dr." too.
They can be called "doctor" all they want.
They will never be "PHYSICIANS".
If Doctor and Physician are identical words, why does the word Physician even exist?A good rule of thumb is: if you have to ask, you probably aren't
You think any newly minted MD or DO intern has any reservations when they introduce themselves to their first patient on July 1st: " Hi, I am Dr. so and so"? It's their inalienable right
The better answer is Doctor and Physician are not identical words.I don't know go ask an English professor or the whoever in charge of adding/removing words from hmm real life?
There is no need for any logical reason. It just is. Like I said above, if you have to ask, you probably aren't. If you are looking for philosophical debates, mental masturbation regarding the semantics, this probably isn't the right place.
where do we draw the line? How do we draw the line? I don't have a problem introducing a clinical psychologist, who has a PhD, as "Dr. Psychologist." I don't have a problem addressing a dentist, who has a DMD or a DDS, as "Dr. Dentist," either. So I'm not really sure why I have a mental block against addressing a PT, who has a PhD, as "Dr. Physical Therapist" or a DNP as "Doctor Nurse Practitioner." Is it the whole "who has final responsibility for the patient" thing? Probably, but is that too arbitrary a line?
It's all about context/environment:
-- PharmD, DPT -- doctor in the classroom or academic environment pertaining to their field of expertise.
-- The psych PhD/PsyD is doctor in the clinical or academic environment, but not the hospital. At the bedside in the hospital, the psychiatrist is the doctor and the PsyD may be depending on the hospital environment.
-- The PhD is doctor on academic councils and the academic environment.
-- DNP may be doctor in the nursing classroom/nursing school and, depending on the amount of research they are doing, sometimes in the general or medical academic environment.
Neither the DNP, PharmD, nor DPT is doctor in the hospital at the bedside. This doesn't seem that controversial.
HH
One wouldn’t think so, but look at the results of the poll?
Would be interesting to see what degree each person who voted holds. I'd be surprised to see an actual MD or DO voting for one of the first two options.
It's all about context/environment:
-- PharmD, DPT -- doctor in the classroom or academic environment pertaining to their field of expertise.
-- The psych PhD/PsyD is doctor in the clinical or academic environment, but not the hospital. At the bedside in the hospital, the psychiatrist is the doctor and the PsyD may be depending on the hospital environment.
-- The PhD is doctor on academic councils and the academic environment.
-- DNP may be doctor in the nursing classroom/nursing school and, depending on the amount of research they are doing, sometimes in the general or medical academic environment.
Neither the DNP, PharmD, nor DPT is doctor in the hospital at the bedside. This doesn't seem that controversial.
HH
A DNP, PharmD, and DPT is a doctor literally every minute of every day until they die. .
Dude. Are you just looking to add napalm to NP threads? Why do you feel the need to keep commenting on these things? So what if a few people think you aren't a doctor or a physician. The fact of the matter is you didn't go to medical school and take Step 1,2,3 or do a residency. If you care so much just go to medical school and go through these steps.A DNP, PharmD, and DPT is a doctor literally every minute of every day until they die. I don’t use my title in the hospital because it’s disrespectful to physicians and confusing to the patients. I don’t use it when I teach, either, because I feel it can negatively impact an open learning environment. I don’t use it when doing research because honestly what’s the point? So I pretty much am never in a situation where I would want to use it.
This is misleading. Your poll question was not, "Which of these are doctors?"
Rather, you asked, "When should a DNP call themselves doctor?"
When they should call themselves doctor is context/environment dependent.
HH
Dude. Are you just looking to add napalm to NP threads? Why do you feel the need to keep commenting on these things? So what if a few people think you aren't a doctor or a physician. The fact of the matter is you didn't go to medical school and take Step 1,2,3 or do a residency. If you care so much just go to medical school and go through these steps.
If you don't care then why even comment? If some DNP somewhere wants to go to their nursing school and call themselves a doctor IDGAF. I called my PI in my lab a Dr. all the time and had no issue with it. I am upset when they misrepresent themselves to patients. such as the time when I was told I'd see a physician and they sent me to a PA as if I wouldn't know the difference.
This is a really bad survey. Like written by someone who doesn't understand how nursing students think.
First of all the 'threat' of nurses that call themselves doctors is bullcrap. I have yet to meet a DNP bold enough to call themself a doctor in front of patient and physician. Sure I've read stories here about them, but I haven't talked to a single DNP or nursing practitioner student who thinks they're a doctor.
I have a PA friend who wouldn't consider herself Doctor....
This is a really bad survey. Like written by someone who doesn't understand how nursing students think.
First of all the 'threat' of nurses that call themselves doctors is bullcrap. I have yet to meet a DNP bold enough to call themself a doctor in front of patient and physician. Sure I've read stories here about them, but I haven't talked to a single DNP or nursing practitioner student who thinks they're a doctor. I have instead talked to several who are intimidated, ashamed, or afraid of the term to the point of talking down about being called a doctor. Even if they were to be called doctor, they know in their minds they're just not: "IknowImnotadoctor". Cognitive dissonance kicks in. These nurses don't want to be known as 'doctor', but instead for everyone in the medical field to be "equal" and to instead be a "provider" of services. The number of nurses I've seen using this term FAR outnumber those who want to be called doctor.
Second, they are afraid of the cultural significance of the term, but none of these students think the term "doctor" means anything. That's that's the first challenge I offer them: tell me what a doctor--what a physician--is. None of them can tell me what function a physician performs. They believe that a nursing practitioner is interchangeable with a physician assistant which is interchangeable with a physician. Anyone can learn any of the clinical skills regardless of education. The intention of the term "provider" is to enshroud the origin of one's credentials to the point that a patient treats everyone the same. They would rather the term "doctor" leave medicine completely.
The chip on the shoulder of any given DNP student is large enough to alter the meaning of "doctor" and "nurse".
Another question to ask is what does doctor even mean these days? What is preventing someone from opening a 'doctorate' program? Many DNP programs are ONLINE. Has that even occurred before in other doctorate professions? You can't get a MD, PharmD, PhD, JD, DDS, by doing online courses but you can with DNP.
It doesnt happen that often but it does happen. some CRNAs introduced themself as Doctor so and so infront of politicians not that long ago.
You can absolutely get a JD and PhD online. I question your opinion for lacking knowledge that basic.
You are correct. i totally forgot about that. how much are they worth though?
Not really, the online JD usually will end up doing $40 bankruptcy file or $150 divorce all inclusive. Online PhD? I know PhD from legit places struggling. Not to mention, these are highly theoretical disciplines where online coursework may be acceptable. How do you teach clinical medicine online?As much as any other lawyer or professor. What you do with your education is ultimately what makes you successful or not.
Not really, the online JD usually will end up doing $40 bankruptcy file or $150 divorce all inclusive. Online PhD? I know PhD from legit places struggling. Not to mention, these are highly theoretical disciplines where online coursework may be acceptable. How do you teach clinical medicine online?
Doctor of Nurse Practitioner or Nursing Practice