- Joined
- Jun 1, 2005
- Messages
- 307
- Reaction score
- 2
how much emphasis is placed on grades, letters, scores, etc. vs. how the actual interview went? I'm just trying to get a feel as to what "getting an interview" actually represents. I've seen in the past people with plenty of interviews ultimately go unmatched and I'm wondering if this is a result of poor interviewing, insufficienct ranking of programs, or lack of competitive scores vs. the other ranked candidates.
I've also heard that there is a numerical system that grades candidates for ranking purposes (i.e. 1 point for AOA, 1 point for publication...). Does anyone have a rough idea as to the specifics of such a system and what the usual criteria are. Thanks!
I've also heard that there is a numerical system that grades candidates for ranking purposes (i.e. 1 point for AOA, 1 point for publication...). Does anyone have a rough idea as to the specifics of such a system and what the usual criteria are. Thanks!