- Joined
- Jul 27, 2011
- Messages
- 2,243
- Reaction score
- 2,915
Rice University Definitely prestigious in Texas (or atleast we like to think of ourselves as the harvard of the south)...But move away from the South and nobody has even heard of us...
Didn't know U of H is tier 1, makes it a pretty awesome school with the low tuition and all...
Rice University Definitely prestigious in Texas (or atleast we like to think of ourselves as the harvard of the south)...But move away from the South and nobody has even heard of us...
Thought that was Vanderbuilt (or Emory).
I was this close to going there. I loved the great books approach. Are you in New Mexico or Annapolis campus?
I think of the top 10.
Annapolis. I'm starting my senior year, and I already have terrible senioritis, because at this stage of my life I just want to be pounding out those pre-med requirements, but I do love the school, it's been a great experience. I love how small the classes are and I love our wacky approach to the sciences. I thought I wanted to go into the law until I got to St John's and took freshman lab. Chick embryo dissections made me fall in love with biology all over again, and the rest is history.
Well I just want to point out that your state school experience may not reflect that of other schools. For example, if you're at UNC for your state school, that's a pretty top notch state school and has multiple leading researchers. On the other hand, some of your local CSU schools aren't quite as wonderful (and plenty of the UC's as well). My friends at UNR have told me that the opportunities there really aren't very good.
This isn't a pitch for private over state schools, but just pointing out that there can be very notable differences in the quality of one's state school depending on the state.
U of H just got tier 1 status this year. I was going around U of H campus and they had huge billboards advertising their newly found tier 1 status. Ofcourse being from Rice myself I was quite amused
True...my state school wouldn't be considered top tier, though. It's a good school, but not UNC or UMich good. And it is the flagship state school, which probably makes a difference.
Who decides what "tier" a school is in? Like, where's the cutoff?
Who decides what "tier" a school is in? Like, where's the cutoff?
its basically like how much research dollars the school gets and how well their research does in the field.
US News and World Report appointed themselves the arbiters of the quality of higher education, and since the majority of colleges and universities in the US have decided to play along, people pay attention. It's a load of crock, but status still matters jusssst enough for people to submit to the ranking system.
Well, yeah, I get that USNWR ranks colleges, but I'm still confused about the definition of a tier. Like, are the top 50 ranked schools considered Tier 1? Or is it the first 100? Or what?
Its just a ranking based on money and silly stuff like that. Tier 1 ones are supposed to be "super" awesome. I dont really buy it.
In Texas its now:Texas, A&M,Rice, Houston. Tech is still angry they dont get that status. Tier status also affects how schools get money here. The big 2, UT and A&M get a load of money from the state thanks to their tier status
I still don't understand how you know which schools are Tier 1!!
In a nut shell, Big research schools with tons of moneys. There are some exceptions to this rule, but its a good broad rule of thumb for a big portion of them
Yeah I get WHY schools are considered "top tier". But is there like a list of them or what? Like, schools 1 through 50 on USNWR are "tier 1". Schools 51-100 are "tier 2". It's the logistics of the tier system I don't understand, not the rationale behind it.
Yeah I get WHY schools are considered "top tier". But is there like a list of them or what? Like, schools 1 through 50 on USNWR are "tier 1". Schools 51-100 are "tier 2". It's the logistics of the tier system I don't understand, not the rationale behind it.
What are First and Second tiers, and why are the schools listed alphabetically in the Second Tier and not number ranked?
U.S. News publishes the numbered rankings of approximately the top 75 percent of schools in each of the categories. The remaining schools are placed in the bottom, or Second Tier, based on their overall score in their category, and listed alphabetically.
Tier 2 is approximately the bottom next 25 percent of schools that are just beneath the numbered ranked schools in the top three-fourths in terms of their rankings in that category. In other words, schools listed in Tier 2 are ranked lower than all those that numerically ranked. In that particular ranking category of schools the Tier 2 schools are the lowest ranked.
We believe that the data are complete enough to numerically rank schools in the top 75 percent of each category, given our robust methodology. Another key reason we can rank that many schools is that the quality of the data we collect has improved over the years, so that it is now rich enough to rank more schools numerically. This change will also reduce ranking volatility, since far fewer schools will now drop in and out of the numerical rankings in any given year.
Schools in Tier 2 are not numerically ranked since the data is not as complete and we want the numerical rankings to emphasize the top schools.
I think when people talk about prestige, they are usually referring to the top 25 tho
Okay eff that it's top 3 or bust.
I think prestige is much much more relevant in other fields where networking predominates (business, politics, law), where you would have access to thousands of extremely well-off alum who can open doors for you that would otherwise be entirely close to a fresh college grad. Also important are the types of companies that recruit at the undergrad--for instance if someone were really intent on going into i-banking, or at least wants it to be an option should the need arise, HYPS, Columbia, Wharton etc. would easily give them the most opportunities, both in terms of how actively recruiting goes and how much support you get from alum and the undergrad. I know for at least a couple of consulting firms and banks, they have alum from the undergrad head the recruiting process for that undergrad, so having a lot of pre-existing connections already in the field is really helpful.
For us prestige is pretty much useless... :/
I thought it was always called nys college of ag, but I graduated from arts, so you're probably right, it just sounded funny...
I think with he way the job market and economy is, it goes beyond just business, politics, and law. Having a good alumni base in the other fields such as engineering is proving to be a boon for a lot of graduates. Schools like GT and Mines come to mind as schools who might not be top 3, but whose "prestige" in engineering lets their students find jobs even in this horrible economy.
Annapolis. I'm starting my senior year, and I already have terrible senioritis, because at this stage of my life I just want to be pounding out those pre-med requirements, but I do love the school, it's been a great experience. I love how small the classes are and I love our wacky approach to the sciences. I thought I wanted to go into the law until I got to St John's and took freshman lab. Chick embryo dissections made me fall in love with biology all over again, and the rest is history.
I'm from annapolis and I thought St John's was entirely humanities. Jeeze...all these years.
A very good community college.
Students in the US who turn their noses up at community colleges tend to be students who are willing to take AP courses and exams. The community college courses I've taken are significantly better than those.
Top 10 undergrad (ivy). Though ultimately it may have been overrated, i would've saved a lot more money at my state school, ucla
I believe some people would have a higher expectation for the AP course compared to a college course at a community college.
I think prestige is much much more relevant in other fields where networking predominates (business, politics, law), where you would have access to thousands of extremely well-off alum who can open doors for you that would otherwise be entirely close to a fresh college grad. Also important are the types of companies that recruit at the undergrad--for instance if someone were really intent on going into i-banking, or at least wants it to be an option should the need arise, HYPS, Columbia, Wharton etc. would easily give them the most opportunities, both in terms of how actively recruiting goes and how much support you get from alum and the undergrad. I know for at least a couple of consulting firms and banks, they have alum from the undergrad head the recruiting process for that undergrad, so having a lot of pre-existing connections already in the field is really helpful.
For us prestige is pretty much useless... :/
Georgia Institute of Technology, also known as Georgia Tech...decent public school mostly well known for engineering...
Yup, I have friends that go there. Do you go to the Varsity alot?
Oh cool, we go sometimes but there are a lot of other places that are better, this one place called Goodfella's right by the Varsity we go to more often. Varsity is sorta overrated...
I lol'd.I visited (when I was visiting the ATL for Emory), but after the third Star Wars joke made on the tour in under five minutes, I just left. Cool school, but way too big and very nerdy.
The 'southern ivies', if I am not mistaken are Emory, Rice, Duke and Vanderbilt. All great schools.
I visited (when I was visiting the ATL for Emory), but after the third Star Wars joke made on the tour in under five minutes, I just left. Cool school, but way too big and very nerdy.
Honestly, that didn't turn me off of the school. What did was the heavy engineering presence, the fact that they heavily recommended doing a co-op in the info session and the size. I liked the campus and the location though (plus they had a ton of stuff geared towards making students happy).
University of Missouri - Kansas City (UMKC) - Undergraduate
Future: UMKC School of Medicine