- Joined
- Aug 16, 2015
- Messages
- 32
- Reaction score
- 5
none. the avg salary is barely 200k and likely to go down with psych NPs bringing down costs.
Well 2018 Medscape Physician Compensation Report Came Out Today:
Medscape: Medscape Access
FWIW, Psychiatry had #1 increase from 2017 (+16%).
Psych Average salary is now 273K
Closing in on fields like GSurg, OBGYN...
To answer OP, Child Psych is usually the highest. 10-20% pay increase usually.
But apart from that, I don't think you will see much added financial benefit of doing psych fellowship (ie, CL, Addiction). Most academic places might give you extra 10 or 20K if you are fellowship trained, but thats about it.
Its not like medicine or surgery where doing a fellowship can potentially double you salary..
But again, I'm not saying psych fellowships are not useful/worthwhile, just might not be financially as rewarding...
Sounds about right. Huge demand right now. But shhhhh, don't tell anyone!
It's actually probably closer to 300k. Remember, over 70% of psychiatrists work less than 40 hours a week.The average salary is 273k? Wow.
Agreed. It's garbage. All it does is make you a better psychiatrist.Sleep has gone down the toilet
Stop the chicken little thing about NPs. They are no more threatening to us than primary care efforts to manage psychiatric issues and in many cases not even as good at it.none. the avg salary is barely 200k and likely to go down with psych NPs bringing down costs.
Interventional psych pays the most.
Agreed. But isn't it hard to get volume for ECT, rTMS, etc? I'm looking through my list, and I have very, very few "worthy" TRD candidates for interventional psych.
Also, a nurse in my ECT clinic told me that Medicare now covers rTMS...is this true? I thought TMS is still cash only...
Pretty sure you are replying to a statement made in jest.
If you can set up a high volume lobotomy practice income is good.
And why are you assuming you can’t repeat lobotomies?Nah, you have to go for the stuff that gets you repeat customers.
And why are you assuming you can’t repeat lobotomies?
Sleep has gone down the toilet
Is this related to the shift to home sleep studies and fewer true PSG's, or is there other downward pressure on sleep? I still think it's unfortunate more sleep docs didn't make like dentists/optometrists/oncologists and get into the accessory side (CPAP).Agreed. It's garbage. All it does is make you a better psychiatrist.
Agreed. But isn't it hard to get volume for ECT, rTMS, etc? I'm looking through my list, and I have very, very few "worthy" TRD candidates for interventional psych.
Also, a nurse in my ECT clinic told me that Medicare now covers rTMS...is this true? I thought TMS is still cash only...
Whether in jest or not, there are definitely people in $$ PP around here who are heavily marketing themselves as TMS experts and pushing TMS for pretty much every indication. I'd assume there's some sort of financial incentive, as doing appropriate insurance-paid TMS is a smaller pool of refractory MDD patients.Pretty sure you are replying to a statement made in jest.
Many insurances cover it and I have seen psychiatrists even waive copays for it which is illegalAgreed. But isn't it hard to get volume for ECT, rTMS, etc? I'm looking through my list, and I have very, very few "worthy" TRD candidates for interventional psych.
Also, a nurse in my ECT clinic told me that Medicare now covers rTMS...is this true? I thought TMS is still cash only...
It wasn't overnight, it was over like, five years. Interest might begin to wane depending on changes in compensation, but predicting the future of any specialty is like predicting the weather in New England.Welp, my field of interest just became much more competitive overnight.
Is this related to the shift to home sleep studies and fewer true PSG's, or is there other downward pressure on sleep?.
Psych NPs only comprise 3.7% of the NP workforce. It's not exactly a popular area for them to practice in, as it boxes them in far more than generalist NP training, so I'd stop worrying about the sky falling from that angle.none. the avg salary is barely 200k and likely to go down with psych NPs bringing down costs.
Psych NPs only comprise 3.7% of the NP workforce. It's not exactly a popular area for them to practice in, as it boxes them in far more than generalist NP training, so I'd stop worrying about the sky falling from that angle.
Is this related to the shift to home sleep studies and fewer true PSG's, or is there other downward pressure on sleep? I still think it's unfortunate more sleep docs didn't make like dentists/optometrists/oncologists and get into the accessory side (CPAP).
Whether in jest or not, there are definitely people in $$ PP around here who are heavily marketing themselves as TMS experts and pushing TMS for pretty much every indication. I'd assume there's some sort of financial incentive, as doing appropriate insurance-paid TMS is a smaller pool of refractory MDD patients.
It wasn't overnight, it was over like, five years. Interest might begin to wane depending on changes in compensation, but predicting the future of any specialty is like predicting the weather in New England.
I mean, I'm hoping it becomes the next derm or plastics, but I think that is a ways off.Yes, I've been saying this since 2014, but a lot of people said it was "fearmongering" talk, etc.
Is Psych going to become much more competitive in the next few years?
Why is Psych not competitive?
is psych really the new radiology?
Of course, I'm not saying Psych today is Derm or Plastics, but its definitely more competitive than it was 5 years ago.
I mean, I'm hoping it becomes the next derm or plastics, but I think that is a ways off.
I've personally met at least 4 in my two years of residency. 1 who was functioning (very poorly) as the CL person for a community hospital, 1 as a sort-of do-it-all on an academic children's inpatient unit (especially insurance auths in lieu of the attendings), and 2 who were used to extend the (very busy) CL service at a large academic hospital (they mostly saw the easy cases in the ED because there weren't enough residents/attendings to see everything). That doesn't count the many patients I've met with a therapist/psych NP combo in the area. Maybe 30% of consults I see in the ED (who have preexisting mental health care and psych meds) have an NP.+1
Exactly. I've only come across 1 Psych NP so far....
Looks like it. https://www.providerexpress.com/con...s/clinResourcesMain/guidelines/mcs/tmsMCS.pdfI know, thats why I was seriously asking if medicare does cover rTMS. In NYC, there are psychiatrists charging a lot for 30 sessions over 6 weeks...
+1
Exactly. I've only come across 1 Psych NP so far....
I'm sure anecdotally everyone has met some Psych NPs, but statistically its still very rare.
... In total, about 11,988 nurse practitioners currently focus on psychiatric and mental health cases."
I'd dispute that "very rare" assertion, given that there are currently only about 25,000 psychiatrists practicing in the US.
I guess we're just "kind of rare", then?
That they make up a small percent of the NP pool isn’t much relevant. They are expanding at a rapid rate. My current state has one residency program and other PMHNP programs in the state are graduating more NPs than the residency program each year. Significantly so.I'm sure anecdotally everyone has met some Psych NPs, but statistically its still very rare.
Demand for Psychiatric Nurse Practitioners
"According to the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANPs), there are over 222,000 licensed nurse practitioners in the US as of 2016. Out of this figure, only 2.4 percent have specialized in psychiatric or mental health practice for adults, while three percent handle family-related cases. In total, about 11,988 nurse practitioners currently focus on psychiatric and mental health cases."
That they make up a small percent of the NP pool isn’t much relevant. They are expanding at a rapid rate. My current state has one residency program and other PMHNP programs in the state are graduating more NPs than the residency program each year. Significantly so.
Fair enough, I definitely don't know much about Psych NP programs, but just based on my personal experience, I have had limited interaction. But I'm sure this varies also geographically..
The original push by the nursing board was that NP’s would assist in practicing in more rural areas where physicians don’t want to go. This has not turned out to be the case.
With a strong political backing, they are gaining independence. In states like NM, they are fully replacing psychiatrists because of employer costs. NM is starting to see a worsening of psychiatrist shortages because of this. They are moving away to find employment.
In my metropolitan area, insurance based psychiatrists are heavily hiring NP’s instead of psychiatrists. Multiple practices within easy driving distance of me have 1-4 NP’s:1 psychiatrist.
One psychiatrist in my area works inpatient and refers all of his discharges to a clinic staffed by his 3 NP’s.
I actually get many of my patients (cash only) that come from being treated by a NP that has no idea what is going on.
+1
Exactly. I've only come across 1 Psych NP so far....
Huh, does that potentially fall under a kickback rule?One psychiatrist in my area works inpatient and refers all of his discharges to a clinic staffed by his 3 NP’s.
Fair enough, I definitely don't know much about Psych NP programs, but just based on my personal experience, I have had limited interaction. But I'm sure this varies also geographically..
I'm sure anecdotally everyone has met some Psych NPs, but statistically its still very rare.
"
It suggests something close to that. These numbers don't account for the amount of hours or jobs worked by the psychiatrists or NPs. It's very possible that the psychiatrists on average work more, which would make NPs less than 1/3 of the workforce, but I doubt this factor would be enough to make NPs "rare" in mental health. Someone not seeing NPs would be more a function of where they work."currently about 25,000 psychiatrists practicing in the US" + "about 11,988 nurse practitioners currently focus on psychiatric and mental health cases."
If those numbers are correct it means that every 3 filled mental health positions 1 is occupied by a NP???
12,000 NP does not seem very rare when you have 25,000 psychiatrists. Am I right?
It suggests something close to that. These numbers don't account for the amount of hours or jobs worked by the psychiatrists or NPs. It's very possible that the psychiatrists on average work more, which would make NPs less than 1/3 of the workforce, but I doubt this factor would be enough to make NPs "rare" in mental health. Someone not seeing NPs would be more a function of where they work.