We bag on your healthcare from a patient perspective not a physician perspective. When your charged $2000 for just an ambulance ride (even when you have insurance, idk if this right but the point still applies) don't you think that's reason enough to bag on your own healthcare system? I had Myocarditis when I was 23 which required several days stay in hospital; how much would that have cost me and how long would it take me to pay it off?I have seen docs from the UK and Canada come here, bag on America's healthcare but I always wonder if they think it's so bad why don't they just go home?
After I received the investigations/treatment for my Myocarditis I simply walked out of the hospital with some free meds, there was no bill, no receipt.
Correct me again if i'm wrong but isn't it like 5-10k to have a baby in the USA?
This video comes to mind, ignore the women that are obviously ignorant:
Now from the Physician point of view (keep in mind i'm M3) the UK health system is basically in volume overload and this is due to the fact such as others have mentioned, extremely poor pay, extremely long training paths - it could be 10 years for Gen surg. In fact the pay is so poor that a PA in America makes more than a 20+ year consultant in the UK. Something like 20% or so of UK graduates go overseas, mainly NZ/AUS because it's US pay with a social healthcare system essentially, so it's the best for both parties. There is a gigantic shortage of physicians which is in part why we have something like a 99.7% match rate and this is why you see articles of nurses doing colonoscopies etc because there is literally nobody else available, it's not a scope creep issue in the UK.
Edit: This isn't a which system is better argument, both systems are what they are.
Last edited: