- Joined
- May 22, 2006
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
I was wondering if I could get some opinions on this subject. I think we all know the duties and responsibilities of various health providers, specifcally RN, PA/NP and MD. I just reviewed starting and 3-5 year salaries of each and came up with the following...(note this is a purely a national average non specific for region and spans ALL specialties)
RN 45K
PA/NP 52K
MD 250K
3-5 year
RN 55K
PA/NP 68K
MD 350K
Now based on education, responsibility, and liability this looks a little skewed to me. This isnt an attack on RN's but a midlevels ability and responsibilites especially at the 3-5 year level are presumably much higher and theoretically should be compensated so. This isnt a point to show that RN's are overpaid.(I would never want to work on the floor!) but that midlevels maybe underpaid. Are MD's overpaid? How much more work do they do? etc
Anyone else agree?
Now these figures can change greatly based on region and speciality but even then the difference is still obvious. Why is it that a midlevel carries out the same if not nearly the same duties under supervision as an MD but gets paid signifigantly less and not "midlevel"?
Purely making a point....I for example other than making the first incision carry out the same physical duties as my supervising MD. I round, take 1st ER call, perfrom simple reductions, apply casts/splints, make decisions for surgery, perform injections, perform consultations, see patients alone in an outpatient setting, carry out entire surgical closures....etc all within a 50-60hr workweek. Am I(we) underpaid? when the OR circulating nurse who makes 10K-15K less a year than myself works 5 8hr shifts and the 11-7 floor nurse works the same carrying out their normal duties? Is the surgeon overpaid when he works the exact same hours as I do?
What do you guys think. I myself am very happy with my salary and compensation but as a whole I think we maybe underpaid.....
RN 45K
PA/NP 52K
MD 250K
3-5 year
RN 55K
PA/NP 68K
MD 350K
Now based on education, responsibility, and liability this looks a little skewed to me. This isnt an attack on RN's but a midlevels ability and responsibilites especially at the 3-5 year level are presumably much higher and theoretically should be compensated so. This isnt a point to show that RN's are overpaid.(I would never want to work on the floor!) but that midlevels maybe underpaid. Are MD's overpaid? How much more work do they do? etc
Anyone else agree?
Now these figures can change greatly based on region and speciality but even then the difference is still obvious. Why is it that a midlevel carries out the same if not nearly the same duties under supervision as an MD but gets paid signifigantly less and not "midlevel"?
Purely making a point....I for example other than making the first incision carry out the same physical duties as my supervising MD. I round, take 1st ER call, perfrom simple reductions, apply casts/splints, make decisions for surgery, perform injections, perform consultations, see patients alone in an outpatient setting, carry out entire surgical closures....etc all within a 50-60hr workweek. Am I(we) underpaid? when the OR circulating nurse who makes 10K-15K less a year than myself works 5 8hr shifts and the 11-7 floor nurse works the same carrying out their normal duties? Is the surgeon overpaid when he works the exact same hours as I do?
What do you guys think. I myself am very happy with my salary and compensation but as a whole I think we maybe underpaid.....