- Joined
- Dec 20, 2007
- Messages
- 4,795
- Reaction score
- 13
From your previous post:
it appeared that you were partially referencing any applicant, not the OP (or other applicants in his predicament) specifically. Although I agree with you in regards to marginal applicants.
So do I need to go back and modify or expand on what I meant?
I never suggested that you don't have to go through some process of elimination to come up with a list of schools. Clearly we all start with the MSAR or something similar, and then we boil down the 120+ allo schools to the realistic schools, eliminating the OOS publics where you have virtually zero chance. That first cut eliminates approximately half the schools in the MSAR, or at least it did for me...YMMV.
Then the next cut should be realistic with regards to one's competitiveness - for marginal applicants, this will be a substantial cut down to maybe 5 to 10 schools. For a marginal applicant to trim this list any further based on "but I don't wanna" before even applying is foolish. The marginal applicant should apply to every school he has a shot at, and then maybe he will be in the position to eliminate the school pre or post interview, and who knows, he may find that he actually matured since living in Omaha or wherever and he will surprise himself at his interest in Creighton...
Stronger applicants can make subjective cuts, be it about geography, or climate, or big city vs small city, or family location, but marginal applicants don't have that much leeway.