SDN members see fewer ads and full resolution images. Join our non-profit community!

Your Thoughts On The Supreme Court Ban On Abortion Procedure

Discussion in 'Medical Students - DO' started by kelaskov, Apr 20, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. kelaskov

    kelaskov Junior Member 5+ Year Member

    171
    9
    Mar 22, 2005
    Comments?

    ACOG Statement on the US Supreme Court Decision Upholding the
    Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003

    Washington, DC -- Despite the fact that the safety advantages of intact dilatation and evacuation (intact D&E) procedures are widely recognized—in medical texts, peer-reviewed studies, clinical practice, and in mainstream, medical care in the United States—the US Supreme Court today upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.

    According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' (ACOG) amicus brief opposing the Ban, the Act will chill doctors from providing a wide range of procedures used to perform induced abortions or to treat cases of miscarriage and will gravely endanger the health of women in this country.

    "Today's decision to uphold the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 is shameful and incomprehensible to those of us who have dedicated our lives to caring for women," said Douglas W. Laube, MD, MEd, ACOG president. "It leaves no doubt that women's health in America is perceived as being of little consequence.

    "We have seen a steady erosion of women's reproductive rights in this country. The Supreme Court's action today, though stunning, in many ways isn't surprising given the current culture in which scientific knowledge frequently takes a back seat to subjective opinion," he added.

    This decision discounts and disregards the medical consensus that intact D&E is safest and offers significant benefits for women suffering from certain conditions that make the potential complications of non-intact D&E especially dangerous. Moreover, it diminishes the doctor-patient relationship by preventing physicians from using their clinical experience and judgment.

    "On behalf of the 51,000 ACOG members who strive to provide the very best possible medical care to the women we serve, I can only hope that in the future, science will again be at the core of decision-making that affects the life and well-being of all of us," said Dr. Laube.

    THE DISSENT:
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/05-380.ZD.html
     
  2. SDN Members don't see this ad. About the ads.
  3. group_theory

    group_theory EX-TER-MIN-ATE!' Administrator Physician Lifetime Donor Classifieds Approved 10+ Year Member

    4,589
    1,334
    Oct 2, 2002
  4. mshheaddoc

    mshheaddoc Howdy Moderator Emeritus 15+ Year Member

    43,162
    81
    Apr 24, 2002
    Wild west of Mistytown
    closing thread. Please post on the thread in TIH here.
     

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page