Hello,
I was hoping for a little advice/insight from some current residents and practicing neurologists. I am considering Neurology and Internal Medicine residency. I was hoping that a few people could shed some light into the 'Neurology Stereotype' Of diagnosing without treating. How much of this is factual, and how much is exaggerated?
Also, besides the obvious scope of practice/specialty, what is fundamentally different between IM and Neuro? I'm sure many of you had a similar debate--what made you decide? Was it purely academic, or did the lifestyle, etc. factor in?
In any case--any advice is appreciated. I'd really like to get a true picture of Neurology as I continue in the decision process.
Thanks!
I was hoping for a little advice/insight from some current residents and practicing neurologists. I am considering Neurology and Internal Medicine residency. I was hoping that a few people could shed some light into the 'Neurology Stereotype' Of diagnosing without treating. How much of this is factual, and how much is exaggerated?
Also, besides the obvious scope of practice/specialty, what is fundamentally different between IM and Neuro? I'm sure many of you had a similar debate--what made you decide? Was it purely academic, or did the lifestyle, etc. factor in?
In any case--any advice is appreciated. I'd really like to get a true picture of Neurology as I continue in the decision process.
Thanks!