Looking for advice for graduate program

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Cydpsyche

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2013
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
Hi,

I am finishing a BA Psychology at DePaul University (SNL program which is for adults) and applying for graduate programs. I considered the question of MA for an LCPC or PsyD programs. It seems to me that by the time one is independently licensed it adds up to 4+ years for an LCPC or 5+ years for a PsyD. I realize that there is a year post-doc, but academics including research project can be completed in 4 1/2 years and with one year post-doc the process is then 5 1/2 years, so it seems to me that the doctorate is worth an extra year and a half.

As an adult student in mid-life with children, etc. I think the PhD model is one with extra demands that are not relevant to my future goals- such as a tenure track and that is why I find the PsyD a better fit. One of the PsyD programs I am seriously considering is the Illinois Professional School of Psychology at Argosy University in Schaumburg (a suburb of Chicago). The faculty at this school is quite impressive- including several instructors with ties to the highly respected Family Institute at Northwestern University. The program is APA accredited and they are also developing their own consortium for practicum placement (which is a big problem everywhere). I have recently worked with a neuro-psychologist who was trained there and he has a thriving practice. At least as far as one can be given the mental health care system.

All things considered I am struggling to understand why this program would NOT fit my needs. The program is increasing some branding separation as the Illinois Professional School instead of highlighting the connection as Argosy University- a large institution which has had some branches with issues. The Psy D is a more unconventional path to becoming a psychologist, but if a program is APA accredited it should be meeting certain standards.

Honestly, I cannot see any issues with this program. I really do not want to waste 3 hours a day commuting into Chicago (plus the added expense of transportation). This is the only Psy D. program in the suburbs. It seems to me that I will be able to obtain what I want- advanced training in clinical psychology under seasoned and reputable professionals, practicum, and license. Does anyone have any comments or input about this?

Thanks🙂
 
Last edited:
Looking on their website, their most recent data shows a 21% APA-accredited match rate for the past several years. Not good. I wouldn't recommend them.
 
Looking on their website, their most recent data shows a 21% APA-accredited match rate for the past several years. Not good. I wouldn't recommend them.

Agreed. It is extremely rare for schools with "Professional School of Psychology" somewhere in their name to make the first cut when internship and postdoc applications are reviewed.
 
Agreed. It is extremely rare for schools with "Professional School of Psychology" somewhere in their name to make the first cut when internship and postdoc applications are reviewed.

INB4 what about the second and third cuts? 😀 But seriously, I unlike others on here do not think that all Psy.D. programs are bad, however, stay away from the Forest Institute, Argosy, and Alliant.
 
INB4 what about the second and third cuts? 😀 But seriously, I unlike others on here do not think that all Psy.D. programs are bad, however, stay away from the Forest Institute, Argosy, and Alliant.

I agree as well, it's just that about 90% of them are, hence the rarity.
 
One of the PsyD programs I am seriously considering is the Illinois Professional School of Psychology at Argosy University in Schaumburg (a suburb of Chicago). The faculty at this school is quite impressive- including several instructors with ties to the highly respected Family Institute at Northwestern University. The program is APA accredited and they are also developing their own consortium for practicum placement (which is a big problem everywhere). I have recently worked with a neuro-psychologist who was trained there and he has a thriving practice. At least as far as one can be given the mental health care system.

I've known students from this particular program. I personally wouldn't waste my time or money. There are master's programs with on-par and superior training.
 
Hi,

The Psy D is a more unconventional path to becoming a psychologist, but if a program is APA accredited it should be meeting certain standards.

APA accredidation is a very minimal standard. You want a program to be APA accredited, but that is only one thing out of many to check off. It doesn't mean anything about the school's reputation, internship match rate, licensure test pass rate etc. An APA internship match rate of 21% indicates that the school is way, way below average in securing accredited internship for their students. There are many professional and career disadvantages if you do not complete an APA internship (e.g., landing a postdoc to get your hours for licensure will be pretty tough, some jobs require APA internships including all VA hospitals). Basically, anything like argosy, alliant, X school of professional psychology, X institute, is considered 4th tier in this field and will not likely get you to your goal. The debt you will accrue is also not in line with salaries.
 
APA accredidation is a very minimal standard. You want a program to be APA accredited, but that is only one thing out of many to check off. It doesn't mean anything about the school's reputation, internship match rate, licensure test pass rate etc. An APA internship match rate of 21% indicates that the school is way, way below average in securing accredited internship for their students. There are many professional and career disadvantages if you do not complete an APA internship (e.g., landing a postdoc to get your hours for licensure will be pretty tough, some jobs require APA internships including all VA hospitals). Basically, anything like argosy, alliant, X school of professional psychology, X institute, is considered 4th tier in this field and will not likely get you to your goal. The debt you will accrue is also not in line with salaries.

I think some are open to debate though.😉
 
I think some are open to debate though.😉

There is the usual short list of Psy.D programs that I and most on here seem to regard as reputable and worthwhile, but in this case that is irrelevant since the OP is location bound. I've have no reason to believe that the program in question would bring the OP anything but excessive debt and limited prospects.
 
There is the usual short list of Psy.D programs that I and most on here seem to regard as reputable and worthwhile, but in this case that is irrelevant since the OP is location bound. I've have no reason to believe that the program in question would bring the OP anything but excessive debt and limited prospects.

Yes I completely agree. However that being said, I believe Psy.D. programs other than Baylor and Rutgers can work for those that aren't location bound.
 
Hi,

First and foremost my sincere thanks to everyone who offered comments- even the people who thought I am a troll or shill- which I am not.

What I am is a woman facing a lot of mid-life educational and career decisions. I worked in an administrative capacity at The Family Institute and think very highly of the people who are involved with research and teaching there. I remain a little confounded as to why faculty with that background would feel comfortable teaching at ISPP at Argosy if it is such a disgrace, but that is another issue.

I am more or less tied down to the western suburbs of Chicago- Wheaton/Naperville for the next two years. I wish I lived on the North Shore, but I don't. Also, I am in a transitional situation with my husband- he has agreed to living apart for two years until my son finishes high school. It is one of those blended family system issues and I am also hesitant to go back to ever living with him because he is a black hole of narcissism which obviously is draining. He has agreed to finance graduate school for the next two years at least. If I return to him he would finance the remaining years of a doctoral program- if I choose to not reconcile with him I am in a much weaker position financially. No surprise there.

I do not believe that a PhD program would accept me due to the fact that I am not young. I'm not old either, but I am a non-traditional aged student. I look like I should be on faculty, not a student- although I am not frumpy. I look like a mid-career professional, but I am behind the curve. I am also concerned that a PhD program would demand so much from me that I would be pulled between those obligations and the needs of my son (he will be a junior in high school and needs lots of structure and guidance). My other hesitation- which is why I am reaching out for a sense of collaboration from others on a similar path- is worrying I will regret "settling" for a master's degree when I am capable of achieving more.

Since the only personal experience I have is that of being a high achieving undergraduate student who is set to graduate this fall, I am trying to get a sense of the demands of pursuing a graduate degree. I understand that it is a long and arduous road to obtain a PhD in any discipline and I have a tremendous amount of respect for those who are able to accomplish that goal. Perhaps the window of time in one's life when pursuing a doctorate no longer makes sense is closing upon me and I am struggling to come to terms with that. When I expressed my concern that no university would want someone over 50 for a doctoral program to one of my Professors at DePaul last week, She replied, "Just apply for a doctoral program. You can do the work. Just be in the process, enjoy it and don't concern yourself with anything else."

The confounding part about graduate school is that if I went for a master's in clinical psychology and then wanted to continue to the doctoral level, it seems to just make the road that much longer. So, I am writing on this forum in the hopes of hearing other's perceptions. I guess the smart move in terms of a cost/benefit analysis is a master's so I can start earning money in the probable circumstance that funding for education will go away in two years. But, I feel as though I am settling or not reaching my full potential. Kind of sad to think that I am considering staying married to someone for financial security, but that has been a legitimate aspect of the institution of marriage for many centuries and an entire different debate.

Obviously, I am struggling to feel that I am making a good decision about the road ahead. Perhaps it is sort of like I would love to drive a Mercedes, but a Prius will get me where I need to go. Anyway, MANY SINCERE THANKS to everyone who took the time to read my post and offer their thoughts in return. Maybe I am simply ruminating too much- but it really is a big decision. Best to everyone on their journey.

Cydpsyche🙂
 
There are a few of us on this board who are non-traditional students with children. It is less of an issue than I think you realize. Particularly if finances are an issue, a PhD would be a better choice than a PsyD, even given that your husband will pay for two years. If you and your husband do part ways after two years, you are left with half a degree. The advantage to a PhD program is that many of them are funded; while the money is not wonderful, being paid to go to school is better than paying to go to school.
As a parent of two children of my own, I understand the concern about not having enough time to balance school and family. Let me be the first to tell you that is not easy, but it is doable.
 
Hi:

I joined this forum just to respond to your post. I am also at SNL and looking into similar programs. I wanted to point out that I do have a few PsyD friends, and it is RARE that your internship would be in the area you want, although not impossible. That is something that is making me hesitant to apply as well as research showing that these programs are highly competitive. Since SNL has "focus areas" and not majors, psychology cannot be listed as yours, mine had to be psychological something or other. I wonder how that would be viewed or SNL is viewed in general by graduate schools since the courses are relatively easy to maintain a high gpa (I do not know anyone with a GPA lower than 3.8 at SNL).
 
Top