CABG is associated with higher long-term survival

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

G0S2

SDN Angel
15+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2003
Messages
1,253
Reaction score
44
Points
4,696
Age
51
Location
TX
  1. Resident [Any Field]
NEJM 352:2174


Study finds that CABG is associated with higher long-term survival is patients with 2 or more diseased arteries versus stenting (PCI). Good for CT fellows to hear, I imagine.
 
G0S2 said:
NEJM 352:2174


Study finds that CABG is associated with higher long-term survival is patients with 2 or more diseased arteries versus stenting (PCI). Good for CT fellows to hear, I imagine.

What's the entire citation (so that i can find this on pubmed)?
 
avgjoe said:
What's the entire citation (so that i can find this on pubmed)?

it's in tomorrow's issue. not posted on nejm.org yet.
 
I received the print today since I am in Mass. It is strange that the website isn't updated. It usually is by the time I receive the print edition.

It is in the May 26 issue Vol.352 No.21 page 2174.

Basically, the surgical group of patients (those receiving CABG) were sicker than those undergoing PCI. When udjusted for basline risk, however, the CABG group had a better overall survival in all groups with three vessel, two vessel and proximal left anterior artery, and two vessels w/o left anterior involvement. Differences in survival arose after only 3 years post procedure.
 
EBM finally makes sense:

Conclusions For patients with two or more diseased coronary arteries, CABG is associated with higher adjusted rates of long-term survival than stenting.

N Engl J Med 2005;352:2174-83.



G0S2 said:
I received the print today since I am in Mass. It is strange that the website isn't updated. It usually is by the time I receive the print edition.

It is in the May 26 issue Vol.352 No.21 page 2174.

Basically, the surgical group of patients (those receiving CABG) were sicker than those undergoing PCI. When udjusted for basline risk, however, the CABG group had a better overall survival in all groups with three vessel, two vessel and proximal left anterior artery, and two vessels w/o left anterior involvement. Differences in survival arose after only 3 years post procedure.
 
I just read that article -- the cardiologists aren't going to like it! (especially the interventional folks).
 
i'm sure in a couple months a group of cardiologists is going to publish their own research on how stents are better than CABG.
 
It doesn't matter what is actually better -- it only matters what the cardiolgist tells their patient to do 😉
 
Top Bottom